Skip to content

Chidamide in HR-AML

Efficacy and Safety of Chidamide in the Maintenance Therapy of High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients: A Multi-center Real-World Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07822789
Enrollment
33
Registered
2026-09-16
Start date
2026-07-27
Completion date
2027-07-31
Last updated
2026-09-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Maintenance Therapy

Keywords

Acute myeloid leukemia, Chidamide, Maintenance therapy, Real-world Study

Brief summary

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with fusion gene-positive including core binding factor (CBF), mixed-lineage leukemia (MLL) gene rearrangement have a high incidence of relapse if they have continuously positive measurable residual disease (MRD) or ELN 2022-high risk chromosome abnormality and could not be bridged to allogenetic heamatopoitic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Histone deacetylase (HDAC) is known to abnormally recruit in these fusion gene-positive AML, and has been proven to be a promising therapy target. Whether HDAC inhibitor chidamide could be used as a maintenance therapy in these AML patients remains unknown. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chidamide in the maintenance therapy of high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with core binding factor (CBF) and measurable residual disease (MRD) positivity, or ELN 2022-high risk fusion gene positive.

Detailed description

Despite the above data providing positive signals for the application of chidamide in fusion gene AML, particularly in high-risk patients, there remain significant gaps in the evidence: 1) most supportive data come from combination therapy in relapsed/refractory settings or post-transplant interventions, and systematic studies on its use as a post-remission maintenance therapy after initial induction are still lacking; 2) existing studies related to maintenance therapy are mostly small-sample retrospective analyses, lacking supportive data from prospective, or multi-center, or large scale designs; 3) for the definition of 'high-risk,' especially incorporating 'MRD-positive' as a strong prognostic indicator in patient selection criteria and evaluating the value of maintenance therapy accordingly, research is still insufficient. Based on the clinical dilemma of high relapse risk after remission in high-risk fusion gene AML patients, and the scientific rationale of chidamide exerting anti-leukemia effects through multiple mechanisms such as correcting epigenetic abnormalities, inducing differentiation, and modulating immunity, combined with its efficacy and safety signals in R/R and post-transplant settings, we propose conducting clinical research on chidamide as maintenance therapy in high-risk fusion gene-positive AML. This study aims to focus on the high-risk patient group who have completed standard induction and consolidation therapy, achieved morphological remission but remain MRD-positive (including CBF-AML and MLL-r AML), who are at extremely high risk of relapse under current standard treatment, and may be unable or not planning to undergo allo-HSCT due to age, comorbidities, or lack of suitable donors. Evaluating whether chidamide as maintenance therapy can effectively clear MRD, reduce relapse rates, prolong disease-free survival and overall survival, and clarify its safety profile in this specific population has significant clinical and scientific value, and is expected to provide a new and effective maintenance therapy option for this high-risk AML population, improving their long-term prognosis. Therefore, conducting this study is an important exploration responding to urgent clinical needs, continuing the chain of evidence from basic and preclinical studies, and striving to fill the gap in the field of maintenance therapy for high-risk AML.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER
Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University
CollaboratorOTHER
First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Guangzhou First People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Dongguan People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Zhongshan People's Hospital, Guangdong, China
CollaboratorOTHER
Shunde Hospital, Sothen Medical University
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Shenzhen Second People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age range ≥18 years, both male and female were eligible. 2. Patients with CFB-AML and MRD positive, or patients with ELN 2022-high risk fusion genes, such as MLL rearrangement, or NUP98 rearrangement, ect. 3. Use of chidamide-based regimens as maintenance therapy for at least 3 months, without undergoing or not planning to undergo allo-HSCT. 4. ECOG ≤4; 5. At screening, laboratory tests meet the following criteria: (1) Complete blood count: hemoglobin (Hb) ≥90 g/L, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1.5×10⁹/L, platelet count (PLT) ≥90×10⁹/L; (2) Biochemical tests: serum creatinine (Cr) ≤1.5× upper limit of normal (ULN); total bilirubin (TBIL) ≤1.5×ULN; alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≤2.5×ULN (for cases with liver metastasis: ≤5×ULN).

Exclusion criteria

1. Known history of allergy to the study drug. 2. Resistant to chidamide. 3. Unable to take oral medications. 4. Concurrent uncontrolled active infection (including bacterial, fungal, or viral infections). 5. Concurrent uncontrolled major organ failure. 6. Currently participating in other clinical studies that affected the primary objectives of this study. 7. Patients deemed by the investigators to be unsuitable for participation in this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
MRD negativity rateAfter 6 cycles of 28-day maintenance therapy, an average of 6 monthsMRD negativity rate after 6 cycles of maintenance therapy (28 days for one cycle).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of remission, DoRThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearThe time from the initiation of maintenance therapy to disease relapse or the last follow-up.
Relapsed-free survivalThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearThe period from the initiation of the study to the first recurrence or last follow-up.
Overall survivalThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearTime from the enrollment into the study to death for any reasons and the last follow-up.
Adverse eventsThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearThe number and proportion of participants with treatment-related hematologic or nonhematologic adverse events, graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 17, 2026