Skip to content

Accuracy of Complete-arch Implant Scans Obtained Using T-Marker

Accuracy of Complete-arch Implant Scans Obtained Using (TruAbutment,Marker)T-Marker Obtained With a Mobile Phone and Tablet: A Randomized Crossover Clinical Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07821905
Enrollment
24
Registered
2026-09-16
Start date
2026-08-01
Completion date
2027-03-01
Last updated
2026-09-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Edentulous Jaw

Brief summary

This randomized crossover clinical study will evaluate and compare the accuracy and effective scanning time of complete-arch implant scans obtained using the (TruAbutment,Marker) T-Marker photogrammetry application operated on a smartphone and a tablet. Twenty-four patients with completely edentulous arches rehabilitated with four well-integrated implants connected to multiunit abutments will undergo both digital impression protocols in a randomized sequence. A verified conventional implant cast will serve as the reference standard. Linear and angular deviations between the implant positions obtained using each digital protocol and the reference model will be evaluated using three-dimensional analysis software. Effective scanning time required for implant coordinate acquisition and registration will also be recorded. The study will determine whether the use of T-Marker with a smartphone provides accuracy and scanning efficiency comparable to its use with a tablet.

Detailed description

Complete-arch implant scanning is challenging because of the large interimplant distances and the limited availability of stable anatomical landmarks, which may result in cumulative image-stitching errors. Photogrammetry-based workflows have been introduced to improve the accuracy of implant position recording. T-Marker is a photogrammetry application that uses external optical markers and image-acquisition protocols to determine implant positions. This randomized crossover clinical study will compare two T-Marker acquisition devices: a smartphone and a tablet. Each participant will undergo both digital impression protocols, with the order of the protocols randomized to minimize potential order and operator-learning effects. A verified conventional splinted implant impression will be used to fabricate a master cast, which will be digitized using a calibrated laboratory scanner to generate the reference dataset. T-Marker optical markers will then be attached to the multiunit abutments, and complete-arch implant position data will be acquired using either an iPhone 15 Pro Max or a tablet. The resulting digital datasets will be compared with the reference dataset using three-dimensional analysis software. Linear and angular deviations will be evaluated to determine the trueness of the implant position measurements. Effective scanning time, defined as the time required to acquire and register all implant positions using the photogrammetric acquisition mode, will also be recorded. Surface and soft-tissue scanning, STL export, and data-merging procedures will not be included in the scanning-time measurement.

Interventions

DEVICESmartphone

Complete-arch implant positions are captured using T-Marker optical markers attached to the multiunit abutments and a smartphone-based photogrammetry workflow. An iPhone 15 Pro Max running the T-Marker application is used to acquire and register the implant positions.

DEVICETablet

Complete-arch implant positions are captured using T-Marker optical markers attached to the multiunit abutments and a tablet running the T-Marker application. The system captures and registers the three-dimensional positions of the four implants.

Sponsors

Menoufia University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Masking description

No participants, care providers, investigators, or outcome assessors will be masked to the digital impression device used.

Intervention model description

Each participant will undergo both digital impression protocols using the T-Marker application, with implant position acquisition performed using a smartphone and a tablet. The order of the two protocols will be randomized using a computer-generated randomization sequence.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Inclusion Criteria: * Adults aged 40-60 * Completely edentulous maxillary arch. * Four well-integrated dental implants connected to multiunit abutments. * Implants positioned in the right and left canine and molar regions. * Presence of a screw-retained interim implant-supported prosthesis or need for definitive implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation. * Willingness to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Fewer than four implants. * Implants placed in the mandibular arch. * Failed implants. * Active peri-implant infection or suppuration

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Angular deviation of complete-arch implant scansImmediately after each digital impression procedureAngular deviation of the implant positions obtained using T-Marker photogrammetry with a smartphone or tablet, compared with the reference implant positions obtained from the verified conventional splinted impression. Angular deviation will be measured in degrees using three-dimensional inspection software.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Linear deviation of complete-arch implant scansImmediately after each digital impression procedureLinear deviation of the implant positions obtained using T-Marker photogrammetry with a smartphone or tablet, compared with the reference implant positions obtained from the verified conventional splinted impression. Linear deviation will be measured in micrometers using three-dimensional inspection software.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 17, 2026