Skip to content

Study of Filovirus Disease Morbi-mortality

Prospective Observational Study of the Mortality of Patients With Filovirus Disease

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07821580
Acronym
TEMBO
Enrollment
10
Registered
2026-09-16
Start date
2026-09-01
Completion date
2032-09-01
Last updated
2026-09-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Filovirus Disease

Keywords

filovirus, Bundibugyo virus

Brief summary

Filoviruses, including Ebola and Marburg, cause hemorrhagic fevers associated with high mortality and still limited scientific literature, in particular for some rare species such as the Bundibugyo virus. The current epidemic of Bundibugyo virus disease in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and Uganda, which has been declared a public health emergency of international concern by the World Health Organization (WHO), illustrates the importance of better characterizing this infection, whose genetic specificities complicate the transposition of diagnostic, therapeutic and vaccine tools developed for Ebola Zaire. Given the incubation time of filoviruses and international mobility, cases can be diagnosed and managed outside of epidemic areas, including in exposed caregivers. However, clinical, biological and therapeutic knowledge available in this context remain very limited. This situation justifies the implementation of an observational cohort of patients with a confirmed filovirus disease, who have arrived or were diagnosed in France. This cohort will describe the clinical evolution of the disease, its prognosis and its pathophysiology, as well as identify new diagnostic, therapeutic or preventive leads.

Detailed description

Filoviruses, including Ebola Zaire, Sudan, Bundibugyo, Tai Forest and Marburg virus, are responsible for haemorrhagic fevers with high overall mortality: a recent meta-analysis reports an average case fatality rate of 59%, with extremes of 20 to 90% depending on the epidemic. Between 1976 and 2014, about twenty epidemics of filoviruses diseases (FVD) occurred in Central Africa, without much scientific documentation. The largest ever is an outbreak of Ebola virus disease (EVD) declared in West Africa between 2014 and 2016 (in Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone) and recorded 11,310 deaths for 28,616 cases. Currently, an outbreak of Bundibugyo virus disease (BVD) is active in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) (Ituri and North Kivu provinces) and Uganda. It was declared a "public health emergency of international concern" by the World Health Organization (WHO) on May 17, 2026. It currently has 399 deaths out of 1333 cases reported as of June 29, 2026, reflecting the scale of the outbreak. Bundibugyo virus (BDBV) was first identified in 2007 in Uganda. The epidemic is only the third documented emergence of BVD, following those observed in Uganda in 2007 and in the DRC in 2012. The lethality of BVD is estimated to be approximately 25%. Genetically, BDBV is different from the most common species, the Zaire Ebola virus (EBOV), in a proportion of about 40%. This genetic distance explains the difficulties in adapting diagnostic approaches (molecular biology) and therapeutic approaches (monoclonal antibodies, direct-acting antivirals, and vaccines) developed for EBOV. By the incubation period, in the order of 2 to 21 days, and the ease of air travel in the 21st century, we can expect that cases of FVD are diagnosed and treated outside of epidemic areas (in particular the healthcare staff working in epidemic areas and contaminated in a nosocomial way). During previous filovirus epidemics, a very small number of infected people were treated outside the epidemic areas. Therefore, little is known to date about the clinical and biological characteristics and the treatment history of filovirus diseases in patients managed outside the African context. In this context, it is necessary to set up an observational cohort study of any case of disease with proven filovirus that arrived or was diagnosed in the national territory in order to describe the disease, its clinical course, prognosis, as well as to study its pathophysiology to identify new targets for the diagnosis and curative and preventive treatment. Knowledge on filovirus diseases acquired during the care of patients with EVD outside of epidemic areas are very fragmented and the absence of biological collections taken from the few patients with EVD in previous epidemics and hospitalized in Europe or the United States did not allow us to describe interactions between the host and the pathogenic species, this being particularly true for rare strains such as the BDBV. Given the genetic distance between species, and that this is the largest epidemic to date caused by the Bundibugyo species, BVD may have clinical, biological, and prognostic features different from other filoviruses.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

: * Confirmed filovirus disease * Hospitalized in a Referenced Healthcare Facility in France Non inclusion criteria : * Refusal by the patient or their legal representative to sign the consent form for the study * Patient deprived of their liberty or subject to a legal protection measure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Vital status on day 28.28 daysThe objective is to describe mortality at day 28 in patients with confirmed filovirus diseases. Day 1 is the day of the first documented positive PCR, regardless of the location of the PCR.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Symptoms collected daily until discharge from hospitalization12 monthsThe aim is to describe the natural history of the disease
All-cause mortality at day 9090 daysThe objective is to describe mortality on day 90
Failure of at least one organ requiring intensive care between D1 and D90 or death90 daysThe objective is to identify the factors associated with a severe form of the disease (failure of at least one organ requiring management in intensive care) and death.
Dosage of supportive care received up to day 28 or hospital discharge28 daysThe objective is to describe the supportive care received by patients as part of the care
Duration of supportive care administered through Day 28 or hospital discharge28 daysThe objective is to describe the supportive care received by patients as part of the care
Drug administered through Day 28 or hospital discharge28 daysThe objective is to describe the supportive care received by patients as part of the care
Vital status on day 28 by subgroups: patients who have received or have not received antiviral and/or immunomodulatory tests28 daysThe objective is to describe the response in terms of mortality according to the specific treatments received (antiviral and/or immunomodulator).
Quantitative viral load at each assessment time point : blood, urine, saliva, vaginal fluid, semen12 monthsThe objective is to study the viral kinetics in blood and other biological samples
Assessment of innate and adaptive immune responses at each available time point, including M6 and M12.12 monthsThe objective is to characterize host responses to understand its pathogenesis, including innate immune responses and acquired, circulating levels of immune signaling molecules in peripheral blood to identify new diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers as well as potential therapeutic avenues.
Assessment of circulating levels of immune signaling molecules in peripheral blood, at each available time point, particularly at M6 and M12.12 monthsThe objective is to characterize host responses to understand its pathogenesis, including innate immune responses and acquired, circulating levels of immune signaling molecules in peripheral blood to identify new diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers as well as potential therapeutic avenues.

Countries

France

Contacts

CONTACTMarie JASPARD, MD
marie.jaspard@aphp.fr06 58 80 90 12
CONTACTMathieu REVEST, MD
Matthieu.REVEST@chu-rennes.fr+33 2 99 28 95 64

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 17, 2026