Skip to content

Submental Island Flap vs Radial Forearm Free Flap in Tongue Reconstruction

Evaluation of Quality of Life Post Tongue Cancer Resection and Reconstruction Using Submental Island Pedicled Flap Versus Radial Forearm Free Flap

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07819617
Acronym
SIPF-RFFF
Enrollment
28
Registered
2026-09-15
Start date
2024-09-01
Completion date
2026-04-01
Last updated
2026-09-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Quality of Life, Tongue Carcinoma, Tongue Neoplasms

Keywords

Submental flap, Radial fore arm flap, Quality of life, Partial tongue resection, Tongue reconstruction

Brief summary

This study evaluates and compares the postoperative surgical outcomes and quality of life (QoL) in patients undergoing tongue reconstruction after tongue cancer resection, comparing two reconstructive options: the Submental Island Pedicled Flap (SIPF) and the Radial Forearm Free Flap (RFFF). Quality of life was assessed using the University of Washington Quality of Life questionnaire (UW-QOL v4) to evaluate functional, cosmetic, and psychological recovery.

Detailed description

Surgical reconstruction following tongue cancer resection is essential for restoring oral function, speech, swallowing, and facial aesthetics. The Radial Forearm Free Flap (RFFF) is widely considered a gold standard for soft tissue oral reconstruction; however, it requires microvascular expertise and carries donor-site morbidity. The Submental Island Pedicled Flap (SIPF) serves as an alternative, offering a reliable regional pedicled flap with local color match and simplified surgical execution without requiring microvascular anastomoses. This retrospective observational cohort study aims to compare patients who received SIPF versus RFFF for tongue reconstruction. The primary objective is to evaluate health-related quality of life outcomes using the validated University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire version 4 (UW-QOL v4), alongside evaluating postoperative surgical outcomes and donor site morbidity.

Interventions

PROCEDURESubmental Island Pedicled Flap (SIPF)

Surgical reconstruction of tongue defect following oncological resection using a pedicled submental island flap.

PROCEDURERadial Forearm Free Flap (RFFF)

Surgical reconstruction of tongue defect following oncological resection using a microvascular radial forearm free flap.

Sponsors

Al-Azhar University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Adult patients (aged 18 years or older) diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue requiring partial or total glossectomy. 2. Indication for immediate soft tissue reconstruction using either Submental Island Pedicled Flap (SIPF) or Radial Forearm Free Flap (RFFF). 3. Patients eligible and cleared for major surgical resection and flap reconstruction under general anesthesia. 4. Patient's informed consent to participate in the study and complete follow-up evaluations.

Exclusion criteria

1. History of previous radiation therapy or surgical intervention in the head and neck region. 2. Clinical or radiological evidence of nodal metastasis in level I submental lymph nodes (for SIPF candidates). 3. Severe systemic comorbidities precluding major surgery or prolonged general anesthesia (ASA class IV or higher). 4. Distance or inability to commit to the 12-month postoperative follow-up schedule and quality of life assessments.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
12-Month Baseline-Adjusted Composite Quality of Life (UW-QOL v4)12 months post operativelyUnweighted composite score calculated as the mean of all 12 domains of the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire version 4 (UW-QOL v4), evaluated at 12 months postoperatively and adjusted for baseline composite score using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Scores range from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better quality of life.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
6-Month Baseline-Adjusted Composite Quality of Life (UW-QOL v4)6 months post operativelyUnweighted composite score of the 12 UW-QOL v4 domains evaluated at 6 months postoperatively and adjusted for baseline composite score using ANCOVA. Scores range from 0 to 100.
Operative timeDay of surgery (intraoperative)Total duration of surgery measured in hours from initial skin incision to final closure.
Length of hospital stayFrom date of surgery to hospital discharge. Up to 30 daysTotal duration of inpatient hospital admission measured in days from surgery until discharge.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMohamed Serag Attia, MSc

Al-Azhar University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 16, 2026