Skip to content

Molecular Imaging to Identify Predictors of Aortic Valve Disease Activity

Molecular Imaging and Deep Phenotyping to Identify Predictors of AS Disease Activity and Progression

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07819344
Enrollment
100
Registered
2026-09-14
Start date
2026-09-30
Completion date
2031-03-30
Last updated
2026-09-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

AORTIC VALVE DISEASES, Calcification; Heart

Keywords

aortic stenosis, calcification, positron emission tomography, calculator

Brief summary

This is a prospective study that aims to develop clinical calculators that will report on the underlying rate of aortic valve calcification. To do so, baseline 18FNaF PET/CT will be obtained to measure AS disease activity and the rate of active microcalcification. Using these data, multi-omics prediction models and calculator tools will be developed to provide an index of ongoing disease activity (active calcification). Follow-up imaging (both echo and CT) will be performed one year after baseline imaging to assess progression. We will test the hypothesis that baseline disease activity (as reported by the predictor models and calculators) is associated with the rate of annualized AS progression in two cohorts (the same cohort using subsequent imaging, as well as the Population Study's cohorts).

Detailed description

Structural imaging modalities, such as echocardiography (echo) and computed tomography (CT), measure the structural consequences of aortic valvular calcification and have proven invaluable for grading AS severity. However, these techniques cannot capture the dynamic microcalcification processes that drive the underlying disease and have proven insufficient for predicting AS progression. In contrast, molecular imaging with 18F-NaF positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-NaF PET/CT) is the gold-standard method for noninvasively measuring the central pathophysiological process driving the progression of AS. This imaging approach uses 18F-sodium fluoride, a tracer that binds preferentially to hydroxyapatite in regions of developing microcalcification. This enables quantification of microcalcification activity (which precedes visible macrocalcification) and provides insights into the underlying disease activity that drives AS progression. Notably, optimized protocols for 18F-NaF PET/CT yield a reproducible biomarker to track disease activity and predict progression. Furthermore, recent advances in PET technology (such as total-body PET scanners) have improved sensitivity by 10- to 40-fold, further enhancing the quantification of the microcalcification rate underlying AS progression. Overall, the assessment of microcalcification activity shifts the focus from static anatomical assessments to measurement of the dynamic pathological process driving AS progression. However, while 18F-NaF PET/CT is unsuitable for routine clinical use (because it is costly and currently limited to research applications), it can be effectively leveraged to train predictive models and deploy them as clinical calculators to estimate the rate of microcalcification from readily available biomarker data. The resulting clinical models and calculators could greatly enhance clinical care by identifying patients at risk of rapid progression, refining risk stratification and prognostic accuracy, and opening avenues for personalized monitoring and treatment in calcific AS. The overarching goal of this Clinical Imaging Study is to develop novel predictive models and clinical calculators that capture AS microcalcification activity and forecast the risk of progressive aortic valve stenosis among participants with mild-to-moderate AS. The investigators will achieve this by performing advanced multimodality imaging, including 18F-NaF PET/CT, to quantify microcalcification activity in deeply phenotyped patients using clinical, imaging, and blood plasma biomarkers. Computational approaches, including AI tools, will identify optimal combinations of imaging and non-imaging predictors of microcalcification activity. The investigators will then develop accessible clinical calculators and test the hypothesis that these models and calculators enhance identification of rapid progressors through cross-validation and external validation in the Population Project cohort (which undergoes identical biomarker phenotyping).

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Males and females * aged 18 years or older * mild to moderate calcific Aortic Stenosis (as defined by standard echocardiographic criteria)

Exclusion criteria

* Bicuspid Aortic Stenosis * pregnancy * cognitive disabilities that impair the ability to comply with instructions or provide informed consent * any other medical condition that may undermine participation * weight \>300 lbs * severe claustrophobia * Pregnancy * subjects who have had significant radiation exposure as part of research (\>2 nuclear tests, computed tomography images, or fluoroscopic procedures) during the preceding 12 months * Individuals with renal dysfunction (eGFR\<55) or a history of allergic reaction to iodinated contrast will not receive the iodinated contrast.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
rate of AS progressionOne yearchange of echo- and CT-derived AS measures

Contacts

CONTACTAhmed Tawakol A Director, MD
atawakol@mgh.harvard.edu6177262000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 17, 2026