Skip to content

The Variation in Electrode Configuration for Termination of Out-of-Hospital Rhythms That Are Shockable in Cardiac Arrest Trial

The Variation in Electrode Configuration for Termination of Out-of-Hospital Rhythms That Are Shockable (VECTORS) Trial: A Pragmatic Trial of Anterior-Posterior Versus Anterior-Lateral Initial Defibrillator Pad Placement for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07818785
Acronym
VECTORS
Enrollment
1500
Registered
2026-09-14
Start date
2027-04-01
Completion date
2029-12-31
Last updated
2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Arrest (CA)

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of two defibrillator pad placements, one where pads are placed on the front of the chest and back (anterior-posterior \[AP\]) and one where the pads are placed on the front and side of the chest (anterior-lateral \[AL\]), for the treatment of cardiac arrest. Both pad placement locations are recommended for use by the American Heart Association (AHA) and International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) and are used in standard treatment. The investigators are hoping to find out if one pad position is more effective than the other in the treatment of cardiac arrest.

Interventions

DEVICEdefibrillator electrode pads

Application of defibrillator electrode pads to be used in cardiac arrest treatment

Sponsors

Oregon Health and Science University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Emergency medical services (EMS)-treated non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Exclusion criteria

* ROSC at EMS arrival (e.g., bystander AED shock with ROSC prior to EMS care) without rearrest during EMS care * Known prisoners * Known pregnant patients * Known pediatric patients (treated under the pediatric algorithm, generally \<15 years) * Known preexisting do-not-resuscitate orders limiting care

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post-Shock Return of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC)day 1Any palpable pulse documented at any time after the first EMS shock

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to first rhythm analysisday 1Time from EMS arrival on-scene for non-EMS witnessed arrests and first rhythm analysis by the defibrillator
Time to initial shockday 1Time from EMS arrival on-scene for non-EMS witnessed arrests and initial shock by EMS
Total EMS shocksday 1Total shocks given by EMS
Time to ROSCday 1Time to ROSC from initial shock with competing risks (e.g. termination of resuscitation, pad change, double sequential external defibrillation use)
Survival to hospital admissionday 1Survival to hospital admission
Survival to hospital dischargethrough study completion, an average of 7 daysSurvival to hospital discharge
Survival to hospital discharge with favorable outcomethrough study completion, an average of 7 daysSurvival to hospital discharge with a Cerebral Performance Category score of 1-2

Contacts

CONTACTJoshua Lupton, MD, MPH
lupton@ohsu.edu503-418-6706

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 15, 2026