Skip to content

Serial Biomarker Testing and Cardiovascular Risk Stratification (ACHILLES)

Assessing Cardiovascular Hazard Via Intraindividual Biomarker Longitudinal Lability: an Evaluation of Serial Testing

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07817576
Acronym
ACHILLES
Enrollment
110000
Registered
2026-09-14
Start date
2004-01-01
Completion date
2030-01-01
Last updated
2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

ASCVD, CKD, Heart Failure

Keywords

Retrospective, Cardiovascular Disease, Prognosis, hsCRP, Lipoprotein (a), Biomarker, Outcome, Variability

Brief summary

The goal of this observational study is to learn how blood levels of biomarkers, e.g. hsCRP and Lp(a) - two markers linked to heart disease risk - change over time in patients who have had these levels tested more than once. The main questions it aims to answer are: How often does a high result on a first test return to normal on a later test? Do patients whose levels stay high across repeated tests have a higher risk of death than patients whose high level was only temporary

Detailed description

Single measurements of cardiovascular risk biomarkers such as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and lipoprotein(a) \[Lp(a)\] are often used to classify patients as low- or high-risk, but biological and measurement variability means a single elevated value may not reflect a patient's true, sustained risk status. This study examines intraindividual variability in serial hsCRP and Lp(a) measurements among patients with repeated testing, to determine how often an initially elevated value normalizes on subsequent testing, and whether persistently elevated levels - rather than a single elevated measurement - better identify patients at genuinely increased cardiovascular risk. Using retrospective, repeated-measures data, patients are classified by testing strategy: a single-measurement approach (elevated vs. not, based on the first available value) versus a serial-measurement approach (persistently elevated across multiple tests vs. transiently elevated vs. never elevated). Cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality are compared across these classification strategies to assess whether transient biomarker elevation carries the same prognostic weight as persistent elevation, and whether repeated testing meaningfully improves risk stratification over a single measurement. The findings are intended to inform whether current single-test-based risk classification should be reconsidered in favor of confirmatory or serial biomarker testing, for both hsCRP and Lp(a), in cardiovascular risk assessment.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

University Hospital Freiburg
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\- Available Biomarker Measurement

Exclusion criteria

\- \< 18 years, Biomarker not available

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
MortalityMortality is assessed at a defined time point (23rd June, 2026) as provided by the registration office (deceased yes/no)From registration office (Meldeamt)

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 15, 2026