Skip to content

Microbial Evaluation of MK1 and Clip Attachments in Implant Overdentures

Microbial Evaluation in Patients Wear Double Structure Bars Implant Supported Mandibular Overdentures Attached by Clips or MK-1 Attachments

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07817498
Enrollment
7
Registered
2026-09-14
Start date
2026-03-01
Completion date
2027-01-01
Last updated
2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Evaluation of Microbial Colonization Around Implants and Overdenture Surfaces Using MK1 and Clip Attachments

Brief summary

This crossover clinical trial aims to compare the microbial colonization associated with double-structure bar implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained by either MK1 or conventional clip attachments. Seven completely edentulous patients will receive both attachment systems sequentially, allowing each participant to serve as their own control. Microbial samples will be collected from the intaglio surface of the prosthesis and peri-implant areas at different follow-up intervals to assess the prevalence of oral microorganisms. The findings will help determine whether the type of attachment influences microbial accumulation and may contribute to improved maintenance and long-term success of implant-supported overdentures.

Interventions

DEVICEMK1 Attachment System

Double-structure bar implant-supported mandibular overdenture retained by MK1 attachments.

DEVICEBar-Clip Attachment System

Double-structure bar implant-supported mandibular overdenture retained by conventional clip attachments.

Sponsors

Mansoura University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Completely edentulous patients aged 45-65 years. * Medically healthy patients with no systemic conditions affecting implant placement or osseointegration. * Healthy maxillary and mandibular residual ridges covered by firm mucosa. * Adequate mandibular bone volume in the interforaminal region to receive four implants (minimum 4 mm diameter and 12 mm length), confirmed by CBCT. * Class I maxillomandibular relationship with sufficient interarch space for implant-supported overdentures.

Exclusion criteria

* Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, immune disorders, osteoporosis, or other contraindications to implant therapy. * Parafunctional habits such as bruxism or clenching. * Flabby ridges or oral mucosal diseases. * Severe temporomandibular joint disorders. * History of allergy to denture or implant materials. * Previous radiotherapy to the head and neck region.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Microbial ColonizationBaseline (T0), 3 weeks (T1), 6 weeks (T2), and 9 weeks (T3) after prosthesis delivery.Quantitative assessment of streptococci and staphylococci species collected from the fitting surface of the prosthesis and peri-implant areas using blood agar culture.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of Microbial Growth Between Attachment SystemsBaseline (T0), 3 weeks (T1), 6 weeks (T2), and 9 weeks (T3).Comparison of bacterial counts associated with double-structure bar overdentures retained by MK1 attachments versus conventional clip attachments.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

CONTACTMohammed Hussein Raafat abd elfatah
mohammed.hussein@mans.edu.eg+201092663488

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 15, 2026