Skip to content

Reduced-Dose Versus Full-Dose Alteplase for High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism

Reduced-Dose Versus Full-Dose Systemic Thrombolysis for High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: A Multicentre, Randomised, Open-Label, Blinded-Endpoint Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07816978
Acronym
REDSTEM
Enrollment
400
Registered
2026-09-14
Start date
2026-12-01
Completion date
2031-01-31
Last updated
2026-09-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Embolism Acute

Keywords

Systemic thrombolysis, Efficacy, Safety, Reduced-dose, Alteplase

Brief summary

High-risk pulmonary embolism is a life-threatening condition requiring immediate reperfusion therapy. Full-dose systemic thrombolysis is recommended as first-line treatment, but its use is limited by the risk of major bleeding, including intracranial hemorrhage. Reduced-dose systemic thrombolysis may reduce bleeding while maintaining clinical efficacy, but this strategy has not been adequately evaluated in patients with high-risk pulmonary embolism. REDSTEM is an international, multicenter, randomized, adaptive, open-label, blinded-endpoint phase 4 trial comparing reduced-dose alteplase with standard full-dose alteplase in adults with acute high-risk pulmonary embolism. The trial will assess whether reduced-dose alteplase preserves early clinical efficacy while reducing severe clinically significant bleeding. Participants will be followed for up to 12 months.

Detailed description

Systemic thrombolysis is recommended as first-line reperfusion therapy for high-risk pulmonary embolism. However, bleeding complications limit its use in clinical practice and contribute to undertreatment of eligible patients. Existing evidence from small randomized trials, observational studies, and meta-analyses suggests that lower-dose thrombolysis may improve safety while maintaining efficacy, but previous studies have included mixed-risk pulmonary embolism populations and only a limited number of patients with high-risk pulmonary embolism. REDSTEM was designed to evaluate whether a reduced-dose alteplase strategy can provide a more favorable balance between efficacy and safety compared with standard full-dose alteplase in patients with high-risk pulmonary embolism. The study uses randomized treatment allocation, blinded endpoint adjudication, independent safety monitoring, and an adaptive design allowing sample-size re-estimation if required. The trial includes early clinical assessments during the acute phase and follow-up through 12 months to evaluate clinical outcomes, safety, functional recovery, quality of life, and health care resource utilization.

Interventions

DRUGReduced-dose alteplase

Alteplase 0.6 mg/kg body weight, maximum 50 mg, administered as an intravenous infusion over 15 minutes

DRUGFull-dose alteplase

Alteplase 1.5 mg/kg body weight, maximum 100 mg, administered as a 10 mg intravenous bolus over 1 to 2 minutes followed by 90 mg as an intravenous infusion over 2 hours.

Sponsors

Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER
Göteborg University
CollaboratorOTHER
Leiden University Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
CollaboratorOTHER
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital, Akershus
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Zurich
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The trial is open-label because alteplase dose and administration regimen differ between treatment groups and immediate clinical management requires knowledge of treatment allocation. The primary endpoint and key secondary endpoint will be adjudicated by an independent central Critical Events Committee blinded to treatment allocation. The trial statistician responsible for the final analyses will remain blinded until database lock and completion of all prespecified analyses

Intervention model description

Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to reduced-dose alteplase or standard full-dose alteplase.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Participant aged 18 years or older. 2. Acute pulmonary embolism verified by computed tomography pulmonary angiography or pulmonary angiography. In hemodynamically unstable participants unable to undergo immediate imaging, presumed pulmonary embolism may be diagnosed based on bedside echocardiographic findings consistent with acute right ventricular pressure overload and high clinical suspicion of pulmonary embolism, provided that alternative causes of hemodynamic instability have been reasonably excluded. In such cases, the treating clinician must have independently decided to initiate thrombolytic therapy irrespective of study participation, and confirmatory imaging demonstrating pulmonary embolism must be performed as soon as clinically feasible. 3. High risk for early death, defined by at least one of the following: 1. High-risk pulmonary embolism according to European Society of Cardiology criteria: * Cardiac arrest with return of spontaneous circulation; * Obstructive shock, defined as systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg or use of vasopressors to maintain systolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg despite adequate filling status, together with end-organ hypoperfusion such as elevated serum lactate \>2 mmol/L, altered mental status, or cold clammy skin; * Persistent hypotension, defined as systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg or a drop in systolic blood pressure ≥40 mmHg for longer than 15 minutes, not caused by new-onset arrhythmia, hypovolemia, or sepsis. 2. Abnormal right ventricular function on echocardiography or computed tomography pulmonary angiography, defined as right ventricular/left ventricular ratio ≥1.0, and elevated cardiac troponin above the local upper reference limit, and acute respiratory failure not primarily caused by underlying lung disease, defined as requiring facemask oxygen supplementation ≥12 L/min, high-flow nasal oxygen, or non-invasive ventilation with FiO2 ≥60% to reach oxygen saturation ≥94%. 4. Female participants of childbearing potential must have a negative urine or serum pregnancy test.

Exclusion criteria

1. Catastrophic pulmonary embolism, defined as ongoing cardiac arrest and/or need for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation and/or immediate VA-ECMO as judged by the treating physicians. 2. Known hypersensitivity to alteplase or any of its excipients. 3. Contraindication to systemic thrombolysis with one or more of the following: * History of hemorrhagic stroke; * Ischemic stroke within the previous 6 months; * Central nervous system neoplasm; * Major trauma, major surgery, or major head injury within the previous 3 weeks; * Active life-threatening bleeding, bleeding into a critical organ or area, or known severe bleeding diathesis; * Chronic use of full-dose oral or parenteral anticoagulation before presentation. 4. The participant has already received reperfusion treatment for the index pulmonary embolism before randomization, including systemic thrombolysis, surgical embolectomy, or catheter-directed intervention. 5. Pregnancy. 6. Current participation in another study that would interfere with participation in this trial. 7. Any other condition that would put the participant at unacceptable risk from the trial interventions as judged by the treating clinician. 8. In countries where required by national regulations: lack of affiliation to a social security system or equivalent health insurance coverage.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of composite efficacy endpointWithin 7 days after randomizationIncidence of a composite endpoint comprising all-cause mortality within 7 days, cardiopulmonary resuscitation and/or veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation within 7 days, recurrent pulmonary embolism within 7 days, clinical deterioration within 24 hours, and lack of clinical improvement at 6 hours.
Key secondary endpoint - Incidence of severe clinically significant bleedingWithin 7 days after randomizationIncidence of severe clinically significant bleeding, defined as major bleeding according to International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria or bleeding requiring urgent medical intervention.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
All-cause mortalityAt 7 days and 30 days after randomizationIncidence of death from any cause.
Pulmonary embolism-related mortalityAt 7 days and 30 days after randomizationIncidence of pulmonary embolism-related death.
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation and/or VA-ECMOWithin 7 days after randomizationIncidence of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and/or veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
Incidence of clinical deteriorationWithin 24 hours after randomizationIncidence of life-threatening hemodynamic or respiratory decline requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation, endotracheal intubation, or VA-ECMO, or an increase in SCAI SHOCK stage after investigational medicinal product administration.
Lack of clinical improvement assessed by SCAI SHOCK stage and oxygen requirementAt 6 hours after randomizationIncidence of unchanged SCAI SHOCK stage or unchanged or rising fraction of inspired oxygen required to maintain oxygen saturation of at least 94%.
Time to clinical stabilization based on predefined hemodynamic and respiratory criteriaFrom randomization until clinical stabilization, assessed up to 7 days after randomizationTime from randomization to the time point at which predefined hemodynamic or respiratory stabilization criteria have been continuously fulfilled for at least 30 minutes
Incidence of recurrent pulmonary embolismAt 7 days and 30 days after randomizationIncidence of objectively confirmed recurrent pulmonary embolism.
Initiation of invasive or non-invasive mechanical ventilationWithin 7 days after randomizationIncidence of initiation of invasive or non-invasive mechanical ventilation.
Win ratio for efficacyWithin 7 days after randomizationWin ratio based on all-cause mortality, cardiopulmonary resuscitation and/or VA-ECMO, clinical deterioration, lack of clinical improvement, recurrent pulmonary embolism, and time to clinical stabilization.
Net clinical benefitWithin 7 days after randomizationComposite net clinical benefit including severe clinically significant bleeding, all-cause mortality, cardiopulmonary resuscitation and/or VA-ECMO, recurrent pulmonary embolism, clinical deterioration, and lack of clinical improvement.
Rescue treatmentBefore clinical stabilization, up to 7 days after randomizationNeed for rescue treatment, defined as additional alteplase, catheter-directed intervention, surgical embolectomy, or VA-ECMO before stabilization.
ICU or high-dependency unit length of stay in daysWithin 30 days after randomizationLength of stay in intensive care unit and/or high-dependency unit.
Hospital length of stayWithin 30 days after randomizationLength of hospital stay.
Major bleedingAt 48 hours, 7 days, and 30 days after randomizationIncidence of major bleeding according to International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria.
Bleeding requiring urgent medical interventionAt 48 hours, 7 days, and 30 days after randomizationIncidence of severe bleeding requiring urgent medical intervention.
Intracerebral bleedingWithin 7 days after randomizationIncidence of intracerebral bleeding.

Countries

Denmark, Norway, Sweden

Contacts

CONTACTKristina Svennerholm, MD PhD
kristina.svennerholm@vgregion.se+46313421000
CONTACTAnnika Odenstedt, Coordinator
annika.odenstedt@vgregion.se+46313421000
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORKristina Svennerholm

Sahlgrenska University Hospital / University of Gothenburg

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 18, 2026