Skip to content

Effect of Changing Grafting Sequences During Sinus Lifting & Simultaneous Implant Placement in the Gained Bone Using Customized Surgical Guide

Effect of Changing Grafting Sequences During Sinus Lifting & Simultaneous Implant Placement in the Gained Bone Using Customized Surgical Guide: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07816107
Enrollment
16
Registered
2026-09-11
Start date
2025-01-24
Completion date
2026-12-30
Last updated
2026-09-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Missing Tooth/Teeth, Vertical Bone Defects

Keywords

Sinus lifting, Dental implants, Bone grafting, Customized surgical guide

Brief summary

The aim of this randomized clinical trial is to evaluate the effect of changing the sequence of bone grafting during maxillary sinus lifting and simultaneous dental implant placement. The study compares a traditional sequence (sinus elevation, implant placement, then bone grafting) with a modified sequence (sinus elevation, bone grafting, then implant placement). Both procedures utilize a customized surgical guide and are performed on patients with a vertical bone measurement of 5 mm or slightly more. The primary goal is to assess bone density, along with secondary outcomes including vertical bone height gained, bone volume, and implant stability.

Detailed description

Maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA) is a common procedure to restore vertical bone defects in the posterior maxilla to allow for oral rehabilitation using dental implants. However, traditional techniques can have demerits such as increased operative time, liability to infection, and increased complication rates. Despite advancements made to improve the surgical technique, several complications can yet arise which may compromise the success of the operation. This study aims to enhance surgical sequences and compare the efficacy of sinus elevation, implant, and bone graft procedures using a customized surgical guide. The guide includes a lateral window for sinus elevation and a drill guiding hole for implant replacement. The study hypothesizes that the modified sequence (sinus elevation, bone graft, implant) is more accurate and provides better outcomes regarding bone density, stability, and height of the gained bone compared to the traditional sequence (sinus elevation, implant, bone graft).

Interventions

PROCEDURETraditional sequence

Sinus elevation is performed, followed by implant placement, and finally packing the opened lateral window with bone graft, all using a customized surgical guide.

PROCEDUREModified sequence

Sinus elevation is performed, followed by packing the sinus with bone graft, and then implant osteotomies are drilled, all using a customized surgical guide.

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age more than 18 years. * Both sexes. * Patients eligible for maxillary sinus elevation, implant, and bone graft procedures. * Adequate general health for dental interventions. * Vertical bone measurement of 5 mm or slightly more.

Exclusion criteria

* Systemic conditions affecting implant success. * Patients with vertical bone measurement less than 5 mm. * Previous sinus surgery or dental implant failure. * Medication that can impair or interfere with normal bone metabolism. * History of head and neck radiotherapy. * Pregnancy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bone density3 months and 6 months postoperativeAssessed using Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and measured in Hounsfield Units (HU)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Vertical bone height gained3 months and 6 months postoperativeEvaluated using Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and measured in millimeters (mm)
Bone volume3 months and 6 months postoperativeComputed using Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and measured in cubic centimeters (cm3)
Implant stabilityImmediately following implant placement and after 6 months postoperativelyMeasured by an implant stability meter (OsstellISQ®) in ISQ VALUE

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

CONTACTAhmed Atito Said Sayed, B. D. S
ahmed.atito@dentistry.cu.edu.eg+201026794490

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 12, 2026