Skip to content

Comparison of the Efficacy of Saccharomyces Boulardii and Rifaximin in the Treatment of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth

Comparison of the Efficacy of Saccharomyces Boulardii and Rifaximin in the Treatment of Abdominal Distension and Diarrhea Related to Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth:a Non-inferiority Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07815548
Enrollment
222
Registered
2026-09-11
Start date
2026-09-10
Completion date
2027-12-31
Last updated
2026-09-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth Syndrome (SIBO)

Brief summary

This multicenter randomized controlled study aims to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of Saccharomyces boulardii sachets versus rifaximin in the treatment of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO), with a focus on symptom relief and the impacts of anxiety-depressive factors on the treatment of abdominal distension and diarrhea in SIBO patients. The findings will offer a new non-antibiotic therapeutic option for SIBO, especially for patients with antibiotic resistance or those requiring long-term management, and lay a theoretical foundation for the clinical application of intestinal microecological regulators.

Interventions

DRUGSaccharomyces boulardii sachets

0.5 g, orally, twice daily for 2 weeks

0.4 g, orally, twice daily for 2 weeks

Sponsors

Shandong University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Aged between 18 and 70 years, male or female. 2. Presenting with chief complaints of abdominal distension and/or diarrhea. 3. Diagnosis of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) confirmed by positive hydrogen-methane breath test.

Exclusion criteria

1. Pregnant, puerperal, or breastfeeding women. 2. Prior history of gastrointestinal malignancy or gastrointestinal surgery. 3. Previously diagnosed or suspected lactose intolerance. 4. Severe or extremely abnormal anxiety-depression scale scores. 5. Confirmed extra-digestive system diseases, including urinary system diseases (e.g., chronic kidney disease), immune system diseases (e.g., scleroderma), nervous system diseases (e.g., Parkinson's disease), and endocrine system diseases (e.g., diabetes mellitus). 6. Use of antibiotics or microecological preparations within 2 weeks before enrollment; receiving endoscopy, enema, or colonic barium-air contrast examination within 2 weeks before enrollment; use of prokinetics, secretagogues, antifoaming agents, antispasmodics, opioids, or antidepressants within 1 week before enrollment. 7. Known allergy to study medications. 8. Immunosuppressed hospitalized patients or hospitalized patients with immune impairment due to critical illness. 9. Unable or unwilling to provide written informed consent. 10. History of psychiatric disorders. 11. Any other conditions that render the subject inappropriate for participation in this study, as judged by the investigator.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Effective Rate After Intervention and 1 Month Post-treatmentEnd of 2-week treatment; 1 month after completion of treatmentProportion of participants achieving clinical effectiveness, defined as complete relief, major relief or partial relief of abdominal distension and diarrhea symptoms. Clinical effective rate = (number of participants with complete relief + major relief + partial relief) / total number of participants × 100%

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Symptom Relief Rate After Intervention and 1 Month Post-treatmentEnd of 2-week treatment; 1 month after completion of treatmentSymptom relief rate calculated as \[(pre-treatment total symptom score - post-treatment total symptom score) / pre-treatment total symptom score\] ×100%. Symptom scores for abdominal distension and diarrhea are assessed by 4-level scoring systems
Change From Baseline in Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) Total ScoreBaseline, end of 2-week treatment, 1 month after completion of treatmentGSRS is a 7-point Likert-type scale evaluating 15 gastrointestinal symptoms; total score ranges from 15 to 105, higher scores indicate more severe gastrointestinal symptoms. Change = post-treatment score minus baseline score
Incidence of Adverse EventsFrom first study drug administration up to 60 days after last study drug doseProportion of participants experiencing adverse events during the 2-week treatment period. Adverse events are graded per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 5.0 (CTCAE v5.0)
Participant Treatment Adherence RateThroughout the 2-week treatment periodTreatment adherence defined as actual study drug consumption accounting for 80%-120% of prescribed dose. Adherence rate = number of participants with adequate adherence / total evaluable participants ×100%
Proportion of Participants With Comorbid Anxiety and DepressionBaseline, 1 month after completion of treatmentProportion of SIBO participants with abnormal anxiety-depression scores. Assessments include Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA), and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD)
Correlation Between Anxiety-depression Scores and Degree of Symptom ReliefBaseline, 1 month after completion of treatmentCorrelation analysis between baseline anxiety-depression scale scores and symptom relief rate after treatment

Countries

China

Contacts

CONTACTXiuli Zuo
zuoxiuli@sdu.edu.cn+86-18560080066

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 16, 2026