Skip to content

Optimizing Early Episiotomy Wound Healing

Optimizing Early Episiotomy Wound Healing: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Hydrophilic Methacrylate Gel Versus Beta-Sitosterol Ointment

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07814781
Enrollment
107
Registered
2026-09-11
Start date
2023-12-15
Completion date
2024-11-01
Last updated
2026-09-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Episiotomy, Perineal Wound Healing

Keywords

Episiotomy, Wound Healing, Hydrophilic Methacrylate Gel, Beta-Sitosterol Ointment, REEDA Scale, Postpartum

Brief summary

This randomized controlled trial compares hydrophilic methacrylate gel versus beta-sitosterol ointment for early episiotomy wound healing. A total of 107 women who underwent mediolateral episiotomy during vaginal delivery were allocated to receive either hydrophilic methacrylate gel (n=53) or beta-sitosterol ointment (n=54). Wound outcomes were assessed by trained observers blinded to treatment allocation and by patients at two time points approximately 12 days apart. The primary outcome was the REEDA score (Redness, Edema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, Approximation). Secondary outcomes included patient-reported pain, cosmetic appearance, satisfaction, perceived treatment effectiveness, ease of application, and likelihood of recommending treatment.

Detailed description

Wound healing following episiotomy is a complex biological process influenced by mechanical stress, inflammatory response, tissue perfusion, and patient-related factors. This prospective randomized single-blinded controlled trial enrolled adult women who underwent mediolateral episiotomy during vaginal delivery at a tertiary care maternity hospital in Qatar. Exclusion criteria included known dermatological conditions affecting wound healing, hypersensitivity to study products, systemic inflammatory disease, chronic conditions delaying healing (e.g., coagulation disorders, diabetes, anemia with Hb \<9 g/dl), prior perineal injury, surgery, or visible lesions, or inability to attend follow-up. A total of 107 women were allocated to receive either hydrophilic methacrylate gel (n=53) or beta-sitosterol ointment (n=54).Outcome assessments were performed by trained observers blinded to treatment allocation and by patients at two time points approximately 12 days apart. Observer-assessed outcomes used the REEDA scale (Redness, Edema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, Approximation). Patient-reported outcomes included pain, cosmetic appearance, overall satisfaction, perceived treatment effectiveness, ease of application, and likelihood of recommending treatment.

Interventions

Topical ointment containing beta-sitosterol applied to the episiotomy/perineal wound site

Hydrophilic methacrylate-based hydrogel applied to the episiotomy/perineal wound site

Sponsors

Hamad Medical Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥18 years * Primigravida (first pregnancy) * Live term singleton pregnancy * Underwent mediolateral episiotomy without tear during vaginal delivery * Adequate reading and writing literacy

Exclusion criteria

* Known dermatological conditions affecting wound healing * Hypersensitivity to study products * Systemic inflammatory disease * Chronic systemic disease that delays wound healing (e.g., coagulation disorders, diabetes, anemia with Hb \<9 g/dl) * Prior perineal injury, surgery, or visible lesions (e.g., genital warts, hemorrhoids) * Inability to attend follow-up appointments

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Perineal Wound Healing Assessed by REEDA ScaleAssessed at two time points: Day 5 postpartum and Day 12 postpartumMeasured using the REEDA scale (Redness, Edema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, Approximation) total score, where higher scores indicate worse wound healing, assessed by trained observers blinded to treatment allocation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complete Wound Healing (REEDA = 0) Assessed at Day 12Day 12 postpartumProportion of participants with a REEDA total score of 0 (no observed redness, edema, ecchymosis, discharge, or approximation abnormality) at Day 12 postpartum, assessed by trained observers blinded to treatment allocation.
Patient-Reported PainDay 12 postpartumPatient-reported pain rated on a 5-category verbal scale (None/Mild/Moderate/Severe/Very severe), categorized as none or mild vs. moderate to very severe.
Patient Satisfaction (Patient-Reported Outcome)Day 12 postpartumPatient-reported overall satisfaction with treatment (categorized as satisfied/very satisfied vs not satisfied).
Treatment Effectiveness Perception (Patient-Reported Outcome)Day 12 postpartumPatient-reported perceived effectiveness of treatment (categorized as effective/very effective vs not effective).
Perineal Cosmetic Appearance (Patient-Reported Outcome)Day 12 postpartumPatient-reported cosmetic appearance of the perineal wound (categorized as improved somewhat/significantly vs no change or worsened).
Ease of Application (Patient-Reported Outcome)Day 12 postpartumEase of applying the topical treatment, categorized as easy/very easy vs neutral or difficult.
Likelihood of Treatment Recommendation (Patient-Reported Outcome)Day 12 postpartumLikelihood of recommending the treatment to others (categorized as likely/definitely recommend vs neutral or unlikely).

Countries

Qatar

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 12, 2026