Skip to content

Right Ventricular Afterload Indices in Lung Surgery

Characterising Pressure-derived Right Ventricular Afterload Indices During Lung Resection Surgery - a Feasibility Study

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07812207
Acronym
RAILS
Enrollment
15
Registered
2026-09-10
Start date
2026-10-01
Completion date
2027-10-01
Last updated
2026-09-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung Cancer (Suspected or Confirmed), Thoracoscopic Lobectomy, One Lung Ventillation (OLV)

Keywords

hemodynamics, lung resection, right ventricle, afterload

Brief summary

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer death in Scotland and the UK. Surgery, typically using a keyhole approach, provides the best chance of cure. Golden Jubilee National Hospital performs over 600 operations each year, making this the busiest lung surgery department in the country. Unfortunately, some patients suffer disabling breathlessness and a limited ability to perform even very gentle exercise after surgery, even if they had no breathing problems before surgery. Understanding the causes and preventing this breathlessness is the focus of this research. Despite advances in techniques, lung cancer surgery can result in long-term weakening of the muscular chamber of the right (-hand side of the) heart which pumps blood to the lungs. During surgery, the pressure against which this pump works increases, making it more difficult to push blood into the lungs. Even after surgery, when the pressure returns to normal, the right heart can remain weak. This weakening can contribute to breathlessness and exercise limitation. Preventing or reducing this right heart weakening may improve quality of life after surgery. The investigators are interested in understanding why this weakening occurs after lung surgery and then to develop treatments to prevent it. The answer may lie in reversing the high resistance against which the heart pumps during surgery. Ultimately, the aim is to improve patients' recovery from surgery and improve both breathing and the ability to exercise. This problem may be treatable with existing drugs which are proven to be safe, easy to deliver and are already available. These drugs can be given around the time of surgery. This study will not involve administering new treatments, though future clinical trial(s) are anticipated. Participants' care will be the same as is usually provided. Participants taking part will undergo more tests and monitoring than usual to help understand the changes taking place during and after surgery. Before a drug trial to test this idea, there are some key things to clarify . This study plans to recruit 15 participants having keyhole lung cancer surgery. The following will be performed: * Blood Tests: blood samples before and after surgery to check for heart injury. * Heart monitoring: temporarily insert a thin tube called a right heart catheter into a large blood vessel in the participants' neck the morning of surgery. This will allow continuous measurement of the pressure in the right heart and lung blood vessels. This will help design and deliver treatments, and how best to measure the effects. This heart catheter will be removed the day after surgery. * Heart scans: perform magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans before and after surgery to measure blood flow and examine the impact of surgery on the heart.

Detailed description

The investigators hypothesise that a transient, acute rise in right ventricular (RV) afterload occurring during lung resection surgery triggers a sterile inflammatory RV injury resulting in persistent RV dysfunction - even in the absence of sustained postoperative pulmonary vascular resistance - which contributes to disabling postoperative dyspnoea and exercise limitation. Therapeutic pulmonary vasodilation is a mainstay of treatment to reduce RV afterload and improve V/Q matching in complex conditions such as pulmonary hypertension, thoracic organ transplant, respiratory distress syndromes and congenital cardiac disease, with well-established safety and feasibility profiles. Anti-inflammatory and cytoprotective properties have also been demonstrated. The inhaled route provides systemic and renovascular stability, ease of administration, selective targeting of the pulmonary vasculature, with high bioavailability and a short half-life. Unlike traditional approaches focussing on PH management, the application of IPVs for postoperative RV dysfunction may simultaneously address both contractility and afterload reduction. Perioperative inhaled pulmonary vasodilator (IPV) therapy may prove to protect the RV from the relatively homogenous insult occurring in controlled clinical conditions as described above. Prior to clinical trials of IPVs, it is necessary to first demonstrate the feasibility of continuous RV / pulmonary vascular haemodynamic perioperative monitoring in lung resection, understand the time course of the perioperative afterload insult and characterise pulmonary vasoreactivity. This study seeks to characterise intraoperative haemodynamics, demonstrating feasibility and inform power calculation for a future early phase IPV trial in lung resection patients. Aims Perform a pragmatic single-centre, prospective study of adults undergoing elective lung resection by VATS and RATS to: * Assess the feasibility and quality of continuous pressure-derived right ventricular afterload measurement using right heart catheterisation in contemporary elective thoracic surgical patient pathway. * Characterise perioperative RV and PA haemodynamics (PVR/time area under curve relationship) throughout the perioperative lung resection pathway. * Quantify perioperative pulmonary vasoreactivity. Methods * RHC and continuous cardiac output (CCO) monitoring with novel "RVCO" (right ventricular cardiac output) algorithm to permit continuous perioperative RV/pulmonary haemodynamic measures. * Contrast CMR to quantify cardiopulmonary blood flow, as the gold standard measure against which other measures (RHC) are compared. * Interval cardiac biomarker (HsTn & BNP) measurement to provide standard for measurement of perioperative RV injury. * Characterise perioperative pulmonary vasoreactivity using oxygen and iNO. * Conduct validated patient-reported quality of recovery questionnaires. Primary objective • Assess the feasibility of collecting perioperative RHC-derived CCO RV/pulmonary haemodynamic data in 15 adult patients undergoing elective lung resection. Secondary objectives * Obtain perioperative (esp. intraoperative) PVR vs time area under the curve (AUC). * Characterise scale, chronology and predictability of intraoperative pulmonary vasoreactivity. * Quantify the cardiac bio-inflammatory response to lung resection. * Clinical and patient-reported outcome measures. * Assess the precision of RHC-measured, RVP waveform-derived PA flow waveform against CMR (gold standard for flow volumes).

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTContrast cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

2 scans per participant: 1 pre-operatively and 1 post-operatively.

Via internal jugular vein using ultrasound and x-ray guidance for diagnostic right heart haemodynamic monitoring

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTPerioperative plasma sampling

High-sensitivity troponin \& B-type natriuretic peptide

OTHERQuality of recovery scale

Completed by each participants on two occasions: preoperatively and postoperatively. Using validated QoR-15 scale.

Sponsors

University of Glasgow
Lead SponsorOTHER
Golden Jubilee National Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥18 * Presumed or confirmed non-small cell lung cancer * Planned (elective) minimally invasive (VATS/RATS) lobectomy using OLV * Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Pulmonary / RV physiological: Severe right sided valvular (tricuspid, pulmonary) disease, Preoperative atrial fibrillation / flutter / non-controlled tachydysrhythmia, Severe RA/RV dilatation, Severe PH (mPAP \>55mmHg). * Awake RHC contraindicated: Severe coagulopathy (PTr \>1.5, PTTr \>1.5), Thrombocytopenia (\<50x109/L), Abnormal vasculature, Unable to lie supine and head down, Endocarditis or intra-cardiac tumour or thrombus, Right-sided valve prosthesis or other implanted cardiac device (e.g. pacing wire), Skin/soft tissue infection overlying insertion point. * CMR contraindicated: Severe claustrophobia/unable to lie supine, Class III obesity (BMI \>40), Presence of non-MRI compatible foreign body or implanted device. * Gadolinium contrast contraindicated: CMR contraindicated (as above) and/or: Intravenous (IV) contrast (Gadolinium) allergy, Acute or chronic renal failure (eGFR \<59ml/min). * Surgical / medical: Planned sub-lobar resection / wedge resection / isolated middle lobectomy / segmentectomy / pneumonectomy, Planned secondary procedure (e.g. mediastinal/cardiac), Pregnancy. * Research: Ongoing participation in other investigational research which would undermine the scientific basis of this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of patients for whom meaningful haemodynamic data is obtained at clinically relevant timepoints24 hoursTime per patient from initiation of right heart catheter (RHC)-derived continuous cardiac output (CCO) monitoring to planned postoperative RHC removal that high-quality\* RV/pulmonary haemodynamic data is obtained: \*High quality defined as: ≥80% of patients (≥12/15) in whom ≥80% of planned time point measurements can be obtained for the duration of the planned (24 hour) CCO monitoring window. Proportion of planned time per patient in which RHC provides any CCO monitoring for the duration of the planned (24 hour) CCO monitoring window. Number of patients in whom RHC dislodged and/or premature removal required.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Haemodynamic 1: PVR vs time24 hoursPerioperative PVR (Wood units) vs. time (seconds) area under the curve (AUC)
Haemodynamic 2: RHC-derived vs. CMR-derived pulmonary artery flow24 hoursRHC-derived PA flow (RVP waveform analysis: L/min) vs CMR-derived PA flow (L/min)
Vasoreactivity24 hours% reduction in PVR on vasoreactivity testing (before vs during vs after OLV).
Cardiac biomarker 1: BNP48 hoursSerum B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) level preoperatively, postoperative days 1 and 2.
Cardiac biomarker 2: HsTn48 hoursSerum high-sensitivity troponin (HsTn) level preoperatively, postoperative days 1 and 2.
Clinical indicator 1: Length of stay30 daysLength of postoperative hospital stay (days)
Clinical indicator 2: Mortality30 daysMortality at 30 days.
Clinical indicator 3: Unplanned hospital readmission (all cause)30 daysUnplanned hospital readmission (all cause) at 30 days.
Validated patient-reported outcome: quality of recovery48 hoursFifteen-item Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scale, a fifteen-item patient-reported questionnaire, each question scored on 11-point scale from 0-10, where 0 is very poor and 10 is excellent. Minimum score 0, maximum score 150.
Postoperative complications at 30 days: highest Clavien-Dindo score30 daysPostoperative in-hospital complications during index surgical admission within 30 days of surgery. The outcome measure is the highest Clavien-Dindo score (only score ≥2 included) \[scored 1-5 with 5 representing the greatest degree of severity\] informed by the Standardising Endpoints in Perioperative trials consensus definitions. The following complication domains are included: 1. Cardiovascular 2. Renal 3. Pulmonary 4. Infection 5. Neurological

Contacts

CONTACTBen Shelley, MBChB, MD
benjamin.shelley@glasgow.ac.uk+44(0)1419515000
CONTACTGareth Lipton, MBChB
gareth.lipton@glasgow.ac.uk+44(0)1419515000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 11, 2026