Skip to content

PRISM Trial: Partial Breast Versus Whole Breast Radiation in Early Breast Cancer

PRISM Trial: Partial Breast Versus Whole Breast Radiation in Ultra-Hypofractionated Irradiation; A Multicenter Study of Toxicity and DosiMetrics

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07811635
Acronym
PRISM
Enrollment
100
Registered
2026-09-10
Start date
2026-09-01
Completion date
2027-12-31
Last updated
2026-09-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer Early Stage Breast Cancer (Stage 1-3)

Keywords

Early-Stage Breast Cancer, Partial Breast Irradiation, Whole Breast Irradiation, Ultra-Hypofractionated Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy, Radiation Toxicity

Brief summary

Breast-conserving surgery followed by radiotherapy is a standard treatment for women with early-stage breast cancer. Whole breast irradiation (WBI) is the current standard approach, but partial breast irradiation (PBI), which treats only the area surrounding the original tumor, may reduce radiation exposure to healthy tissues while maintaining similar treatment effectiveness. The PRISM Trial is a prospective, multicenter, phase II randomized controlled trial that will compare ultra-hypofractionated PBI and WBI using the same radiation schedule of 26 Gy delivered in five fractions with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). One hundred eligible women with early-stage breast cancer will be randomly assigned to receive either PBI or WBI after breast-conserving surgery. The primary objective is to compare acute treatment-related skin toxicity between the two treatment approaches using both clinician-reported Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v6.0) and patient-reported outcomes (PRO-CTCAE). Secondary objectives include evaluation of early and late toxicity, dosimetric parameters, normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), and the relationship between radiation dose distribution and clinical toxicity over 12 months of follow-up.

Detailed description

Breast Cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy among women worldwide and represents a significant and growing health burden in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs), including Pakistan. According to GLOBOCAN (2022), approximately 2.3 million women were diagnosed with breast cancer globally, with nearly 670,000 deaths reported. Asia alone accounted for nearly 1 million new cases, representing 42.9% of the global burden. Breast-Conserving Surgery (BCS) followed by Whole Breast Irradiation (WBI) remains the standard treatment for women with early-stage breast cancer. Recent advances in radiotherapy have demonstrated that ultra-hypofractionated WBI, delivered as 26 Gy in five fractions, provides comparable tumor control with reduced treatment duration and improved patient convenience. Partial Breast Irradiation (PBI) has also emerged as an attractive alternative by limiting radiation exposure to the tumor bed and surrounding tissues, thereby potentially reducing treatment-related toxicity while maintaining excellent oncologic outcomes in appropriately selected patients. Multiple randomized trials have demonstrated that PBI provides oncologic outcomes comparable to WBI in appropriately selected patients, with similar rates of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). A meta-analysis of 14 randomized and observational studies involving over 17,000 patients reported comparable 5-year (RR 1.34) and 10-year (RR 1.29) IBTR rates between PBI and WBI, with reduced acute toxicity and similar late toxicity. The RAPID trial, a multi-center randomized study of 2,135 women, demonstrated non-inferior local recurrence rates at 8 years (3.0% vs. 2.8%) using PBI (38.5 Gy in 10 twice-daily fractions) compared with WBI; however, PBI was associated with significantly higher late toxicity and poorer cosmetic outcomes, with increased grade 1-2 toxicities and adverse cosmesis at 3 years. These findings were largely attributed to the twice-daily treatment schedule and shortened 6-hour interfraction interval, which may have limited normal tissue repair. This hypothesis was supported by evidence from head and neck radiotherapy demonstrating increased toxicity with shorter interfraction intervals. Subsequently, the Canadian phase II OPAR trial evaluated once-daily PBI (27.5 Gy or 30 Gy in 5 fractions) and demonstrated excellent cosmetic outcomes, low toxicity, and only three local recurrences at a median follow-up of 3.1 years, supporting once-daily PBI as a safer and more tolerable approach. Further evidence from the IMPORT LOW trial (40 Gy in 15 fractions) and the Florence trial (30 Gy in 5 fractions delivered on alternate days) confirmed that appropriately delivered PBI achieves comparable local control to WBI while reducing acute and late toxicity and improving cosmetic outcomes. Similar findings have also been reported in the GEC-ESTRO and TARGIT-A trials, further supporting the oncologic safety of PBI in selected patients. In addition to reducing irradiated breast volume, PBI may decrease radiation exposure to critical organs such as the heart, potentially lowering the long-term risk of ischemic heart disease associated with WBI. Despite these encouraging results, important limitations remain, including heterogeneity in dose, fractionation, target delineation, and treatment techniques across studies, limited long-term follow-up for some PBI regimens, and the use of conventional rather than contemporary hypofractionated WBI as the comparator in many trials. Moreover, previous studies have primarily focused on local control and cosmesis, with limited evaluation of dosimetric parameters and their correlation with clinical outcomes, highlighting an important gap that warrants further investigation. Furthermore, there is no prospective evidence directly comparing ultra-hypofractionated PBI and WBI using the same dose schedule and modern Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques. The PRISM trial aims to address this evidence gap by comparing toxicity, dosimetric parameters, and early oncologic outcomes between these two treatment approaches. The primary objective of this study is to compare the incidence and severity of acute radiation-induced skin toxicity between patients receiving ultra-hypofractionated WBI and those receiving ultra-hypofractionated PBI. Secondary objectives include comparing early late toxicity up to 12 months, evaluating dosimetric parameters, estimating Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP), correlating dosimetric parameters with observed toxicity, and assessing intermediate oncologic outcomes including overall survival and breast cancer-specific survival.

Interventions

RADIATIONUltra-Hypofractionated Partial Breast Irradiation

Ultra-hypofractionated partial breast irradiation (PBI) delivered using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). A total dose of 26 Gy in 5 once-daily fractions will be delivered over 5-7 days to the protocol-defined partial breast target volume following breast-conserving surgery.

Ultra-hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (WBI) delivered using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). A total dose of 26 Gy in 5 once-daily fractions will be delivered over 5-7 days to the whole breast following breast-conserving surgery.

Sponsors

Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Due to the nature of the radiotherapy interventions, participants and treating clinicians cannot be blinded. Outcome assessors and, where feasible, data analysts will remain blinded to treatment allocation to minimize assessment bias. Standardized toxicity grading systems and validated patient-reported outcome measures will be used throughout the study.

Intervention model description

Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either ultra-hypofractionated partial breast irradiation (PBI) or ultra-hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (WBI). Treatment will be delivered in parallel throughout the study, with each participant receiving only the assigned intervention.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
45 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Women aged ≥45 years. * Newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed breast carcinoma, including Invasive Ductal Carcinoma (IDC), Invasive Lobular Carcinoma (ILC), or Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS). * Early-stage disease (T1-T2, node-negative \[N0\]), with no evidence of distant metastasis. * Hormone receptor-positive disease (ER and/or PR positive). * HER2-positive disease, provided patients have received or are receiving appropriate HER2-targeted therapy, as per institutional practice. * Patients who have undergone breast-conserving surgery with no tumor on inked margins or no residual disease following re-excision.

Exclusion criteria

* Age \<45 years. * Multicentric disease. * Locally advanced or node-positive disease (T3-T4 and/or N+) or evidence of distant metastasis. * Lobular Carcinoma In Situ (LCIS). * Triple-negative breast cancer. * Positive surgical margins or incomplete breast-conserving surgery not suitable for re-excision. * Prior ipsilateral breast irradiation. * Non-breast malignancy within the past 5 years, except treated non-melanoma skin cancer or in-situ carcinoma. * Pregnancy or lactation at enrollment. * Inability to identify the tumor bed on planning Computed Tomography (CT), such as absence of surgical clips or seroma. * Unacceptable radiotherapy planning feasibility for the experimental technique according to protocol constraints.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Acute Treatment-Related Adverse Events by CTCAE Grade and Acute Treatment-Related Symptoms Reported Using PRO-CTCAE3 months after completion of radiotherapyNumber of participants experiencing acute treatment-related adverse events, with severity graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 6.0, and number of participants reporting acute treatment-related symptoms using the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the CTCAE (PRO-CTCAE).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Late Treatment-Related Adverse Events by CTCAE Grade and Late Treatment-Related Symptoms Reported Using PRO-CTCAE6 months and 12 months after completion of radiotherapyNumber of participants experiencing late treatment-related adverse events, with severity graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 6.0, and number of participants reporting late treatment-related symptoms using the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the CTCAE (PRO-CTCAE).
Dosimetric ParametersBaseline at the time of radiation treatment planningDose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters for the breast planning target volume (PTV), heart, and ipsilateral lung, including V95%, V105%, mean dose, and maximum dose for the breast PTV; mean dose, V5Gy, and V25Gy for the heart; and mean dose, V5Gy, and V20Gy for the ipsilateral lung.

Countries

Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates

Contacts

CONTACTFatima Shaukat, MBBS, FCPS
drfatimaali89@gmail.com03222528223
CONTACTYumna Ahmed, MBBS, FCPS
yumnahmedali@gmail.com+92 321 3093115
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORFatima Shaukat

Cyber knife & Tomotherapy center, JPMC

STUDY_DIRECTORYumna Ahmed

Cyber knife & Tomotherapy center, JPMC

STUDY_DIRECTORRabia Tahseen

Cyber knife & Tomotherapy center, JPMC

STUDY_DIRECTORNadeem Parvez

Gulf International Cancer Centre, Abu Dhabi, UAE

STUDY_DIRECTORAgha Hammad Khan

Ziauddin Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan

STUDY_DIRECTORReem Khaled Ujaimi

King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

STUDY_DIRECTORAyesha Nooruddin

Cyber knife & Tomotherapy center, JPMC

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 11, 2026