Skip to content

Health Education to Reduce Unnecessary Cesarean Section Among Primigravida Women

Effectiveness of Health Educational Program for Primigravida Women in Reducing the Rate of Unnecessary Cesarean Section

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07810751
Acronym
CS
Enrollment
120
Registered
2026-09-09
Start date
2026-07-01
Completion date
2026-12-15
Last updated
2026-09-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cesarean Section

Keywords

Unnecessary Cesarean section, Vaginal delivery, Primigravida women, Health education, knowledge, attitudes

Brief summary

This study aims to evaluate the Effectiveness of Health Educational Program for Primigravida Women in Reducing the Rate of Unnecessary Cesarean Section. Specific objectives: 1. To assess primigravida women's knowledge and attitudes regarding cesarean section and normal vaginal delivery before and after implementation of the health educational program among the study and control groups. 2. To develop and implement a health educational program regarding cesarean section and normal vaginal delivery. 3. To assess primigravida women's choice regarding the mode of delivery before and after implementation of the health educational program among the study and control groups. 4. To evaluate the actual mode of delivery among primigravida women after implementation of the health educational program in both the study and control groups.

Detailed description

1. Cesarean section is an essential and potentially life-saving intervention when medically indicated. However, cesarean delivery without a clear medical indication may expose women and newborns to avoidable short- and long-term risks. Inadequate knowledge, fear of labor, misconceptions regarding vaginal delivery, and external influences may affect pregnant women's preferences regarding the mode of delivery. 2. This study will use a quasi-experimental, two-group, pretest-posttest design. A purposive sample of 120 eligible primigravida women in the third trimester of pregnancy will be recruited from the antenatal clinic at Women's Health Hospital, Assiut University. Participants will be assigned to an intervention group of 60 women and a control group of 60 women. 3. At baseline, women in both groups will complete assessments of sociodemographic and pregnancy-related characteristics, knowledge regarding vaginal and cesarean delivery, attitudes toward modes of delivery, and preferred mode of delivery. 4. The intervention group will receive a structured health educational program covering the definition, indications, advantages, risks, and complications of vaginal and cesarean delivery. The program will be supported by illustrated materials and an Arabic educational booklet. The control group will receive routine antenatal care. 5. the post-test will be completed after the intervention, knowledge, attitudes, and mode-of-delivery choice will be reassessed in both groups using the same assessment instruments. After childbirth, participants will be contacted to determine their actual mode of delivery. For participants who undergo cesarean delivery, the documented reason for the procedure will be recorded.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALHealth Educational Program on Modes of Delivery.

1. A structured antenatal health educational program on Modes of Delivery delivered by the investigator to primigravida women. The program provides evidence-based information regarding normal vaginal delivery and cesarean section, including definitions, medical indications, advantages, risks, maternal and neonatal complications, and common misconceptions regarding both modes of delivery. 2. The educational program is supported by illustrated educational materials and an Arabic booklet prepared by the researcher.

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Eligible participants will be assigned to one of two parallel groups. The study (Intervention) group will receive the structured health educational program on Modes of Delivery in addition to routine antenatal care, while the control group will receive routine antenatal care only.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Pregnant women in their third trimester. * Women with singleton pregnancy. * Women willing to participate in the study. * No indications for cesarean delivery.

Exclusion criteria

\-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Undergoing Cesarean Delivery, Assessed Using the Actual Mode of Delivery Data Collection Formduring postpartum period (within 6 weeks postpartum)1. The actual mode of delivery will be assessed using the researcher-developed Actual Mode of Delivery Data Collection Form during postpartum follow-up. The participant's mode of delivery will be classified as vaginal delivery or cesarean delivery. 2. The number of participants who undergo cesarean delivery will be divided by the total number of participants in each study arm who complete delivery follow-up and multiplied by 100. The outcome will be reported as the percentage of participants who undergo cesarean delivery in each study arm. The unit of measure is percentage of participants 3. For participants who undergo cesarean delivery, the reason for the cesarean procedure will also be recorded.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change in Attitude Score Measured by the Attitudes Toward Modes of Delivery Questionnaire.Baseline and 4 weeks after the educational intervention1. Participants' attitudes toward normal vaginal delivery and cesarean delivery will be assessed using the researcher-administered Attitudes Toward Modes of Delivery Questionnaire. The questionnaire consists of 15 statements rated on a 3-point Likert scale. 2. For positively worded statements, "agree" is scored 2 points, "uncertain" is scored 1 point, and "disagree" is scored 0 points. Negatively worded statements will be reverse scored, as appropriate. Item scores are summed to produce a total attitude score ranging from 0 to 30 points, with higher scores indicating a more positive attitude toward evidence-based selection of the mode of delivery. 3. A total score of 18 to 30 points is categorized as a positive attitude, while a score of 0 to 17 points is categorized as a negative attitude. The outcome will be reported as the mean change in the total attitude score from baseline to 4 weeks after the educational intervention. The unit of measure is points.
Percentage of Participants Preferring Vaginal Delivery Measured by the Women's Choice of Mode of Delivery Questionnaire.Baseline and 4 weeks after the educational intervention.1. Participants' preferred mode of delivery will be assessed using the Women's Choice of Mode of Delivery Questionnaire. The questionnaire asks each participant to select her preferred mode of delivery as either normal vaginal delivery or cesarean delivery. 2. The questionnaire also assesses the reported reasons for the participant's preference, including labor pain, cost, physician preference, health beliefs, familiarity with the mode of delivery, previous knowledge, and information received through the educational program. 3. The outcome will be reported as the percentage of participants who select normal vaginal delivery as their preferred mode of delivery at baseline and at 4 weeks after the educational intervention. The unit of measure is percentage of participants.
Mean Change in Knowledge Score Measured by the Knowledge Regarding Modes of Delivery Questionnaire.Baseline and 4 weeks after the educational intervention1. Participants' knowledge regarding normal vaginal delivery and cesarean delivery will be assessed using the researcher-administered Knowledge Regarding Modes of Delivery Questionnaire. The questionnaire consists of 30 items covering the definition of cesarean delivery, maternal and fetal indications for cesarean delivery, and maternal, fetal, and neonatal complications associated with the modes of delivery. 2. Each correct answer is scored 2 points, an "I do not know" answer is scored 1 point, and an incorrect answer is scored 0 points. Item scores are summed to produce a total knowledge score ranging from 0 to 60 points, with higher scores indicating greater knowledge. Knowledge levels are categorized as poor knowledge (less than 30 points), fair knowledge (30 to 44 points), or good knowledge (45 to 60 points). 3. The outcome will be reported as the mean change in the total knowledge score from baseline to 4 weeks after the educational intervention. The unit of measure is points.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

CONTACTAya S Abd Elhakim, assistant lecturer
ayasalah@aun.edu.eg+01140290229

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 10, 2026