Alcohol Use Disorder
Conditions
Keywords
alcohol use disorder
Brief summary
This study aims to systematically explore the effectiveness of accelerated HD-tACS in treating AUD, particularly its efficacy in reducing alcohol craving and preventing relapse in AUD patients.
Detailed description
This study conducted a multi-center randomized clinical controlled trial among individuals with alcohol use disorders, aiming to verify the effectiveness of accelerated HD-tACS in targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for the treatment of AUD. In particular, it aimed to assess the efficacy of accelerated HD-tACS in reducing alcohol craving and reducing relapse. Eligible patients were randomly divided into the accelerated HD-tACS group and the sham stimulation group in a 1:1 ratio. Clinical and electroencephalogram data were collected at baseline and after the intervention. Additionally, a follow-up assessment of alcohol consumption was conducted for all participants after the intervention ended.
Interventions
The stimulation parameters are 40Hz and 2mA. The stimulation protocol is 20 minutes per session, 3 times per day, for a total of 10 consecutive days.
The stimulation parameters are 40Hz and 2mA. The stimulation protocol is 20 minutes per session, 3 times per day, for a total of 10 consecutive days. At the commencement and conclusion of each therapeutic session, a 30-second ramp-up stimulation and a 30-second ramp-down stimulation (totaling 60 seconds) are administered, respectively, while the current output of the device is maintained at zero throughout the intervening interval.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Age range: 18-55 years old, gender not restricted; * Meets the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for alcohol use disorder (moderate to severe); * AUDIT score ≥ 16; * Baseline score after alcohol cue-induced stimulation is ≥ 3; * Completed detoxification treatment before enrollment (moderate to severe), with detoxification duration of ≥ 7 days and ≤ 90 days; * Has a primary school education or above, and can understand and complete the research assessment; * Voluntarily participated in the study and signed the informed consent form.
Exclusion criteria
* Currently, there are other substance use disorders (except nicotine); * Currently, there are schizophrenia, bipolar disorder or other severe psychotic disorders; * Has a history of epilepsy or family history of epilepsy; * Has a history of brain trauma, brain surgery or intracranial metal implants; * Has received electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), transcranial electrical/magnetic/ultrasound stimulation within the past 6 months; * Pregnant or lactating women; * Other situations that the researchers consider unsuitable for participation in this study.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change of Craving | baseline; The 2nd, 4th, 6th, 8th and 10th days during the intervention period; 4 weeks after treatment; 12 weeks after treatment | Visual Analog Scale, range 0-100 point, the higher the score, the more one wants drugs. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Compulsory drinking | baseline; 1 day after treatment was completed | The Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale (OCDS) assesses compulsive thoughts and impulsive behaviors related to alcohol consumption. It consists of 14 items, each rated on a 5-point scale from 0 to 4. Scores ranging from 0 to 14 indicate almost no compulsive drinking characteristics, 15 to 28 indicate obvious compulsive thoughts or impulses, and scores above 29 indicate a significant compulsive drinking pattern with a high risk of relapse. |
| impulsivity | baseline; 1 day after the treatment was completed | Stop Single Task |
| Negative reinforcement learning task | baseline; 1 day after treatment was completed | The negative reinforcement learning task was adopted to evaluate the patients' avoidance-avoidance behaviors and learning. By calculating and modeling, the avoidance-avoidance behavior bias (active avoidance bias ) and the learning rates based on different feedback: learning from successfully avoiding the aversive stimulus; learning from experiencing the aversive stimulus) were constructed. |
| Depressive state | baseline; 1 day after treatment was completed | The depression assessment was conducted using the Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 (PHQ-9), which consists of 9 items, each representing a different aspect of depressive symptoms. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale. 0-4 points indicate no depressive symptoms, 5-9 points represent mild depression, 10-14 points indicate moderate depression, and scores above 15 indicate severe depression. |
| Anxiety state | baseline; 1 day after treatment was completed; | The anxiety assessment was conducted using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder - 7 (GAD-7) self-rating scale. The core statistical indicator of this scale is the total score. The higher the score, the more severe the anxiety. A total score of 0-4 indicates no anxiety or the anxiety level is not clinically significant; a score of 5-9 represents mild anxiety; a score of 10-14 indicates moderate anxiety; and a score of 15 or above indicates severe anxiety. |
| Sleeping conditions | baseline; 1 day after the treatment was completed | The assessment was conducted using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), with the total score ranging from 0 to 21. A higher score indicates poorer sleep quality. |
| EEG | baseline; 1 day after treatment was completed | EEG features such as event-related potentials (ERPs) and power spectral density (e.g., theta or alpha power) |
| Changes in Reward Learning | baseline; 1 day after treatment was completed | Reward Learning Task |
| use of alcohol | 4 weeks after treatment; 12 weeks after treatment | Simple questionnaire to collect alcohol consumption and drinking frequency. |
Countries
China
Contacts
Shanghai Mental Health Center