Skip to content

Evaluation of Jugular Venous Distensibility Index in Intravascular Fluid Management and Comparison of the Effectiveness of Noninvasive and Minimally Invasive Methods

Evaluation of Jugular Venous Distensibility Index in Intravascular Fluid Management and Comparison of the Effectiveness of Noninvasive and Minimally Invasive Methods

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07807709
Enrollment
82
Registered
2026-09-08
Start date
2024-01-01
Completion date
2024-08-01
Last updated
2026-09-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Assessment of Intravascular Volume Status in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients

Keywords

fluid management, hemodynamic monitoring, Right Internal Jugular Vein, Inferior Vena Cava, Distensibility Index, Pleth Variability Index, Pulse Pressure Variation, Stroke Volume Variation, Intravascular Volume Status

Brief summary

Assessment of intravascular volume status is an important component of hemodynamic management in critically ill patients. Several noninvasive and minimally invasive parameters, including the pleth variability index (PVI), pulse pressure variation (PPV), stroke volume variation (SVV), and ultrasonographic measurements of venous diameter variation, can be used for this purpose. Although the inferior vena cava distensibility index (IVC-DI) is commonly evaluated using ultrasonography, visualization of the inferior vena cava may be technically difficult or time-consuming in some patients. The right internal jugular vein is more superficial and may therefore provide a faster and more accessible alternative. The primary aim of this prospective observational study is to evaluate the correlation and agreement between the right internal jugular vein distensibility index (RJV-DI) and IVC-DI in mechanically ventilated adult intensive care unit patients. The secondary aims are to compare the correlations of RJV-DI and IVC-DI with PVI, PPV, and SVV and to compare the acquisition times of the two ultrasonographic measurements. The study will assess whether RJV-DI may provide a practical and faster alternative for hemodynamic assessment, particularly when visualization of the inferior vena cava is difficult.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTPleth variability index

Pleth variability index

Pulse pressure variation

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTStroke volume variation

Stroke volume variation

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTRight jugular vein distensibility index

Right jugular vein distensibility index

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTInferior Vena Cava Distensibility Index

Inferior Vena Cava Distensibility Index

Sponsors

Gaziosmanpasa Research and Education Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults aged 18 years or older * Admission to the intensive care unit * Receiving invasive mechanical ventilation at the time of assessment * Availability of PVI, PPV, and SVV measurements during the hemodynamic assessment * Availability of technically adequate right internal jugular vein and inferior vena cava ultrasonographic measurements obtained during the same assessment session

Exclusion criteria

* Age younger than 18 years * Presence of cardiac arrhythmia * Not receiving invasive mechanical ventilation at the time of assessment * Inability to obtain technically adequate right internal jugular vein or inferior vena cava ultrasonographic images * Unavailable or incomplete PVI, PPV, or SVV measurements

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Correlation Between the Right Internal Jugular Vein Distensibility Index and Inferior Vena Cava Distensibility IndexDuring a single assessment session on Day 1The association between the right internal jugular vein distensibility index (RJV-DI) and inferior vena cava distensibility index (IVC-DI), both expressed as percentages, will be quantified using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in Measurement Acquisition Time Between RJV-DI and IVC-DIDuring a single assessment session on Day 1The time required to obtain technically adequate RJV-DI and IVC-DI measurements will be recorded in seconds. The paired acquisition times will be compared to determine which ultrasonographic assessment can be performed more rapidly.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 12, 2026