Skip to content

Biomarker-Guided Mycophenolate Mofetil Elimination in Low-Risk Older Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients

Optimizing Immunosuppression in Low-Risk Older Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients (OPTIMA-KT): A Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label, Blinded-Endpoint Single-Site Pilot/Feasibility Trial of Biomarker-Guided Mycophenolate Mofetil Elimination

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07806136
Acronym
OPTIMA-KT
Enrollment
20
Registered
2026-09-08
Start date
2026-08-31
Completion date
2029-08-01
Last updated
2026-09-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Kidney Transplant Recipient

Brief summary

Most kidney transplant recipients take a combination of anti-rejection medicines for the rest of their life. One of these is called mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), also known by the brand name CellCept. While MMF helps protect the kidney, taking it for many years can cause infections, low blood counts, stomach problems, and a higher risk of certain cancers, problems that older adults are especially likely to experience. We are doing this study to learn whether carefully and slowly stopping MMF in older adults who are doing well after their transplant is as safe as continuing MMF, when we use blood and urine tests to closely watch for any early signs of trouble. The information learned could help future kidney transplant patients use less medicine without losing their transplant.

Detailed description

To evaluate the feasibility, safety, protocol adherence, biomarker monitoring completion, and preliminary clinical event rates associated with stepwise MMF elimination over 6 months compared with standard-of-care immunosuppression in low-risk older adult kidney transplant recipients. Secondary objectives. To compare between arms: eGFR trajectory and proteinuria at Months 6 and 12; infection incidence (including CMV and BK), hospitalization, and adverse drug events; de novo DSA incidence and time to de novo DSA; and the kinetics and predictive performance of dd-cfDNA and urine CXCL9 and CXCL10 for rejection and de novo DSA. Exploratory objectives. To assess the association between PIRCHE-II score and individual primary endpoint components; the performance of combined biomarker panels versus single biomarkers; health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes through Month 12; and cost and healthcare resource utilization through Month 12 across study arms.

Interventions

Participants are administered MMF

DRUGPrednisone (SOC arm)

Participants in SOC arm may be administered Prednisone as indicated

DRUGPrednisone (MMF Elimination arm)

Participants in the MMF Elimination arm may be administered prednisone as indicated

Sponsors

Virginia Commonwealth University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Greater than 60 years of age * Greater than 12 months from kidney transplant * Stable maintenance tacrolimus- based immunosuppression for at least 3 months without dose changes greater than 25% * PIRCHE-II score less than or equal to 65 calculated from available donor and recipient HLA typing * Ability to provide written informed consent and comply with study procedures

Exclusion criteria

* Multi-organ transplant or prior graft loss due to rejection * Maintenance immunosuppression including belatacept, cyclosporine, azathioprine, sirolimus, or other agents in lieu of tacrolimus or MMF * Steroid-free regimen * Active malignancy (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) * Uncontrolled infection * BK viremia greater than 10,000 copies/mL, or BK nephropathy * High immunologic risk (any preformed DSA, positive crossmatch, or biopsy-proven rejection within the prior 6 months) * Pregnancy, breastfeeding, self-reported pregnancy, positive pregnancy test during screening if testing is indicated, or inability/unwillingness to comply with required pregnancy prevention measures if of childbearing potential * Inability to comply with study procedures including monthly visits and biospecimen collection * Concurrent participation in another conflicting interventional trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility of MMF Elimination6 monthsProportion of eligible participants enrolled and retained through completion of the intervention
Protocol Adherence6 monthsProportion of participants completing the assigned treatment strategy without major protocol deviations
Biomarker Monitoring Completion6 monthsProportion of scheduled biomarker assessments successfully completed.
Clinical Composite Event Rate6 monthsTime to first occurrence of all-cause death, graft loss, biopsy-proven rejection, major infection requiring IV therapy or hospitalization, graft-related hospitalization, or confirmed de novo donor-specific antibody.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Compare estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) trajectory at Months 6 and 12Months 6 and 12Compare estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) trajectory at Months 6 and 12.
Compare Urine Protein-to-Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) Between Arms at Months 6 and 12Months 6 and 12Compare Urine Protein-to-Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) Between Arms at Months 6 and 12.
Comparison of Infection incidenceMonths 6 and 12Number of participants experiencing one or more infections
Comparison of Participants HospitalizedMonths 6 and 12Number of participants experiencing one or more hospitalizations
Comparison of Total HospitalizationsMonths 6 and 12Total number of hospitalizations across all participants
Comparison of adverse eventsMonths 6 and 12Number of participants experiencing one or more adverse events
Comparison of serious adverse eventsMonths 6 and 12Number of participants experiencing one or more serious adverse events
De Novo Donor-Specific Antibody IncidenceMonth 12Number of participants who develop confirmed de novo donor-specific antibodies after randomization
Time to De Novo Donor-Specific AntibodyMonth12Time from randomization to first confirmed de novo donor-specific antibody
Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA (dd-cfDNA)Month 12Longitudinal change in dd-cfDNA and its predictive performance for rejection and de novo donor-specific antibody
Urine CXCL9 Concentration (pg/mL)Month 12Longitudinal change in urine CXCL9 and its predictive performance for rejection and de novo donor-specific antibody
Urine CXCL10 Concentration (pg/mL)Month 12Longitudinal change in urine CXCL10 and its predictive performance for rejection and de novo donor-specific antibody

Contacts

CONTACTAmber Paulus, PhD
amber.paulus@vcuhealth.org(804) 827-1743
CONTACTNatalie Kilmarx
natalie.salsini@vcuhealth.org(804) 828-7522
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAmber Paulus, PhD

Virginia Commonwealth University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 9, 2026