Skip to content

Prognostic Value of 2026 AHA/ACC Clinical Categorization in Acute Pulmonary Embolism Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department

Prognostic Value of the 2026 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) Clinical Categorization System (Categories A-E) for Predicting 30-Day Major Adverse Pulmonary Embolism Events (MAPEE) in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07805616
Acronym
APEX-2026
Enrollment
600
Registered
2026-09-04
Start date
2026-04-17
Completion date
2027-03-01
Last updated
2026-09-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Pulmonary Embolism, Pulmonary Embolism, Venous Thromboembolism

Keywords

AHA/ACC guidelines, MAPEE, risk stratification

Brief summary

Background: The 2026 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) Pulmonary Embolism Guideline (Creager et al., Circulation 2026) introduced a novel five-category (A-E) clinical classification system with subcategories and an R modifier, replacing prior risk stratification frameworks. Prospective validation of this classification system using composite clinical outcomes is lacking. Objective: To evaluate the prognostic value of the 2026 AHA/ACC clinical categorization (Categories A-E plus R modifier) for predicting 30-day Major Adverse Pulmonary Embolism Events (MAPEE) in emergency department (ED) patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Methods: Prospective observational cohort study conducted at Marmara University Faculty of Medicine Emergency Department, enrolling 600 consecutive adult patients with confirmed acute PE by computed tomography (CT) pulmonary angiography between April 2026 and January 2027. Primary outcome: MAPEE composite (all-cause mortality OR hemodynamic deterioration OR treatment escalation OR cardiopulmonary resuscitation) within 30 days. Secondary outcomes include area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) comparison with the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2019 risk stratification (exploratory), negative predictive value (NPV) of low-risk categories (A+B) for safe discharge, MAPEE trend across C1/C2/C3, and R modifier odds ratio. Statistical analysis: Jamovi v2.x. Reporting follows the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) 2007 checklist.

Detailed description

STUDY DESIGN: Single-center prospective observational cohort. No intervention applied. Patients managed per standard of care. SETTING: Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital Emergency Department, Istanbul, Turkey. Annual ED census approximately 200,000 visits. STUDY POPULATION: Adult patients (18 years or older) presenting to the ED with confirmed acute PE on computed tomography (CT) pulmonary angiography, enrolled consecutively from April 2026 to January 2027 (anticipated enrollment period 10 months). EXPOSURE: 2026 AHA/ACC PE clinical category assigned independently by two trained emergency physicians at presentation. Categories: A (subclinical/incidental), B (symptomatic, low severity; Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) I-II / simplified PESI (sPESI)=0), C1/C2/C3 (elevated severity; stratified by right ventricular (RV) dysfunction and cardiac biomarkers), D1/D2 (incipient cardiopulmonary failure), E1/E2 (established cardiopulmonary failure). R modifier applied when hypoxemia/tachypnea/escalating oxygen requirement present without meeting higher category criteria. PRIMARY OUTCOME - MAPEE (Major Adverse Pulmonary Embolism Event): composite endpoint defined as occurrence of any of the following within 30 days: (1) All-cause mortality, (2) Hemodynamic deterioration (systolic blood pressure (SBP) less than 90 mmHg for at least 15 minutes or vasopressor requirement), (3) Treatment escalation (systemic thrombolysis, catheter-directed therapy, surgical embolectomy, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)), (4) Cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Expected event rate: 12% (n approximately 59 events out of 492 analyzable patients after 18% attrition from 600 gross enrollment). SAMPLE SIZE RATIONALE: Based on the Hanley-McNeil variance formula (Hanley and McNeil, Radiology 1982;143:29-36). H0: AUC=0.65 (minimum clinically meaningful discrimination); H1: AUC=0.80 (supported by published composite-outcome AUC values for comparable systems: PESI 0.84, Bova score 0.82, Hestia criteria SROC 0.81); two-sided alpha=0.05. At the planned n\_gross=600 enrollment (n\_net=492 analyzable, 59 expected events, 433 non-events), the design provides approximately 97.6% power for H1=0.80 using the standard single-proportion Hanley-McNeil test (a conservative pooled-variance sensitivity approach yields approximately 79.2%; the sample size is considered adequate under either method). Minimum detectable AUC at 80% power is approximately 0.761. Events per variable (EPV) = 59/5 = 11.8, supporting multivariable models with up to 5 predictor variables (EPV of at least 10 recommended per Peduzzi et al. 1996). DeLong AUC comparison (AHA/ACC 2026 vs ESC 2019, secondary outcome S1) will require substantially larger samples for adequate power given the two correlated ROC curves; this comparison is designated exploratory/hypothesis-generating and will not be used for confirmatory inference. STROBE COMPLIANCE: This study follows the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) 2007 checklist for reporting of observational studies.

Interventions

OTHER2026 AHA/ACC Clinical Risk Categorization

Not a therapeutic intervention. Refers to the 2026 AHA/ACC clinical categorization framework (Categories A-E plus R modifier for right ventricular strain) applied at presentation to prognostically classify patients with confirmed acute pulmonary embolism. All patients are managed per standard institutional practice; no protocol-driven treatment or diagnostic assignment is made based on this categorization.

Sponsors

Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age \>=18 years 2. Confirmed acute PE on CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) within 24 hours of ED presentation 3. Informed consent obtained 4. Ability to complete 30-day follow-up

Exclusion criteria

1. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) 2. Age \<18 years 3. Pregnancy 4. Incomplete CTPA or non-diagnostic imaging 5. Prior PE within 3 months 6. Refusal of informed consent 7. Inability to complete 30-day follow-up (no phone/address)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Major Adverse Pulmonary Embolism Event (MAPEE) - 30-day composite30 daysComposite of: (1) all-cause mortality, OR (2) hemodynamic deterioration (SBP \<90 mmHg for \>=15 minutes or vasopressor requirement), OR (3) treatment escalation (systemic thrombolysis, catheter-directed therapy, surgical embolectomy, or ECMO), OR (4) cardiopulmonary resuscitation - within 30 days of ED presentation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
S3: MAPEE trend across AHA/ACC subcategories C1, C2, C330 daysLinear MAPEE event rate trend across AHA/ACC subcategories C1, C2, and C3, assessed via Cochran-Armitage trend test.
S4: Odds ratio for MAPEE by R modifier status30 daysOdds ratio (OR) and likelihood ratio (LR+/LR-) for MAPEE in patients with vs without the R modifier (right ventricular strain) at presentation.
S2: NPV of AHA/ACC Category A+B for MAPEE30 daysNegative Predictive Value (NPV) of AHA/ACC Category A+B for MAPEE, evaluating potential for safe emergency department discharge without hospital admission.
S6: 30-day ED revisit rate for PE-related complaints30 daysRate of emergency department revisit for pulmonary embolism-related complaints within 30 days of index presentation.
S1: AHA/ACC vs ESC 2019 ROC-AUC comparison (exploratory)30 daysComparison of ROC-AUC: 2026 AHA/ACC A-E system vs ESC 2019 risk stratification for MAPEE prediction (DeLong test - EXPLORATORY/hypothesis-generating; n=600 enrollment marginally below the 621 required for 80% power at H1=0.80; no superiority claim will be made).
S5: Intensive care unit (ICU) admission rate by AHA/ACC categoryUp to 30 daysICU admission rate within 30 days of ED presentation, stratified by 2026 AHA/ACC clinical category at presentation.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

CONTACTEmir Ünal, Assistant Professor
emirunal@gmail.com+90 216 657 06 06
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORArzu Gundogdu

Marmara University

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMustafa Altun, Emergency Medicine Specialist

Marmara University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 5, 2026