Skip to content

Extended Validation of Donor-derived Cell-free DNA in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Multinational Study to Evaluate the Performance of Donor-derived Cell-free DNA in Detecting Kidney Allograft Rejection Across Context of Use, Populations, and Injury Phenotypes

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07805343
Acronym
VALiDATE
Enrollment
5000
Registered
2026-09-04
Start date
2024-06-15
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2026-09-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Kidney Rejection Transplant, Rejection Acute Renal, Rejection Chronic Renal, Transplantation

Keywords

donor-derived cell-free DNA, organ rejection, kidney rejection transplant

Brief summary

This is a multinational, multi-center, observational cohort study. Kidney allograft rejection is poorly detected by standard-of-care biomarkers. Although dd-cfDNA has been associated with improved rejection detection when added to standard-of-care biomarkers and clinical parameters, little is known about its performance across Banff 2022 rejection phenotypes and injury patterns, in various clinical scenarios and populations, and when measured repeatedly over time.

Detailed description

Allograft rejection remains a leading cause of kidney transplant failure, and standard-of-care monitoring detects it late. Recently, combining dd-cfDNA with functional, immunological and clinical parameters has been shown to improve rejection detection under the Banff 2019 framework. However, the Banff 2022 revision formally recognized microvascular inflammation without DSA or C4d (MVI, DSA-negative, C4d-negative) and probable antibody-mediated rejection as distinct rejection phenotypes, raising the question of whether dd-cfDNA can help detecting these phenotypes. Its performance also remains unclear across the broader spectrum of Banff rejection phenotypes and injury patterns, when the complete diagnostic workup is unavailable, in the early post-transplant period, in specific populations, and when measured repeatedly over time. The investigators therefore aim to evaluate the association between dd-cfDNA and Banff rejection phenotypes and its added diagnostic value to detect them, across the clinical situations in which the biomarker is used. The study has three objectives: * To assess the association between dd-cfDNA and Banff 2022 rejection phenotypes and injury patterns, including antibody-mediated, T cell-mediated and mixed rejection, borderline changes, probable antibody-mediated rejection and MVI, DSA-negative, C4d-negative, together with its relationship to the severity of the underlying lesions, with particular attention to microvascular inflammation. * To assess the diagnostic value of dd-cfDNA, alone and within the integrative dd-cfDNA model, for the detection of biopsy-proven rejection as defined by the Banff 2022 classification, and beyond standard-of-care monitoring. * To assess whether this performance is maintained across clinical scenarios and populations, including incomplete diagnostic workup, the first month post-transplant, delayed graft function, and specific subpopulations. Secondarily, the investigators aim to assess whether serial dd-cfDNA improves the detection of rejection, and its prognostic value for death-censored allograft failure.

Interventions

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is fragmented extracellular DNA released in the bloodstream from cells undergoing apoptosis or necrosis. In transplantation, donor-derived cfDNA (dd-cfDNA) is detected in the blood of kidney recipients and has been proposed as a noninvasive biomarker to detect rejection.

Sponsors

Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation
Lead SponsorOTHER
Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale
CollaboratorOTHER
Université Paris Cité
CollaboratorOTHER
Paris Cardiovascular Research Center (Inserm U970)
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Recipients transplanted from a deceased or living donor * Kidney allograft biopsy concomitantly with dd-cfDNA measurement * Written informed consent at the time of transplantation for inclusion the center database

Exclusion criteria

* Combined organ transplantation * Pregnant women * Grafts from monozygotic twins * Recipient of a bone marrow transplant

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Allograft active injuryPeriprocedural (At time of biopsy)Antibody-mediated rejection (active or chronic active) T cell-mediated rejection (active or chronic active) Mixed rejection Microvascular Inflammation, DSA-negative, C4d-negative Probable AMR

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Allograft lossRate of participants reaching graft loss between transplantation and last follow up (up to 10 years post-transplant)Return to dialysis or re-transplantation

Countries

Belgium, Brazil, France, Germany, South Korea, Spain, Switzerland, United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 5, 2026