Skip to content

Adherence and Quality of Life Across Three Different Intermittent Fasting Protocols in Obese Working Women

Adherence and Quality of Life Across Three Different Intermittent Fasting Protocols in Obese Working Women: A Randomised Controlled Trial. This

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07804329
Acronym
IF
Enrollment
32
Registered
2026-09-04
Start date
2023-04-01
Completion date
2023-06-30
Last updated
2026-09-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obese Adults

Keywords

Intermittent Fasting, Time Restricted Eating, Modified Alternate Day Fasting, Periodic Fasting, Adherence, Quality of Life

Brief summary

In these recent years, Intermittent Fasting (IF) has become popular among the public and health fraternities not only because it produced evidence-based results as an alternative dietary approach in weight loss strategy, but also putative for its practical implementation to link with daily routine. IF is defined as a range of dietary regimens involving fasting for an extended time period (16-48hrs) with little to no energy intake on fast day. However, there are many types of IF regiments with different methodological approaches, and results are inconsistent and debatable. Therefore, it has raised a question on which IF regimen design will possibly maximise the health benefit. Thus, the aim of this study is to identify IF regimens that are most feasible and acceptable to working women. The purpose of this study was to examine which type of IF regiment is more feasible for weight loss intervention programmes by prescribing three different types of IF to participants

Detailed description

The order in which participants get the interventions was randomized. Body composition were measured before and after intervention by using inBody machine and a quality of life survey was conducted at the end of the intervention by using the Short Form (SF-12) Health Survey form. Adherence to the IF protocol were monitored througout the intervention period of 4 weeks. The procedure of 3 different types of IF regiment: Time restricted eating (TRE), Periodic Fasting 2days/week (PF5:2) and Modified Alternate Day Fasting (MADF). Participants were assigned to one of these three IF groups. Participation in this study was completely voluntary. Benefit of Study: This study provided education on food selection during IF implementation, food intake monitoring/record strategy, and established support system that motivated participants to continue healthy dietary intake and make it a lifestyle. Risk of study: Participation in this study was at minimal risk. However, participants were informed that if they ever feel uncomfortable during the study, they may decide to stop at any time and notify us through support group that was developed and accessible by all participants. Confidentiality: All of the data collected were held confidential. In anything we write or present, participants name remained anonymous. All the data collected were stored in a device protected with password which is accessible by researchers only. Hardcopy documents with participants details, i.e name, address and other personal information were kept in a dedicated drawer located at nutrition lab at Faculty of Sport and Exercise Sciences and accessible to researchers only.

Interventions

OTHERAdherence to the IF Protocol

Adherence Percentage

OTHERQuality of Life

Survey of PCS and MCS Score

Sponsors

Suriana Md Akir
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

Randomised control trials. participant is randomised sigle blinded to one of the intermittent fasting protocols (TRE, MADF or PF5:2)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
25 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* a body mass index (BMI) of 27.5-32.4 kg/m² (obesity class I), low physical activity levels (\<150 minutes/week), and no prior participation in health or diet-related programs.

Exclusion criteria

* Women who were pregnant, had cardiovascular disease or a history of eating disorders were excluded

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adherence PercentageDaly throughout 4 weeks of intervention. From Day 1 until Day 28Number of days adhered to daily energy requirement divided by total of intervention days. Adherence Percentage = (No. of days adhered to daily energy requirement/No. of intervention days)\*100

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Anthropometry and Body CompositionPre and post-measurement. Measured at baseline (Day 1), and post-intervention (Day 28)Anthropometry and Body Composition as exploratory measures. Body weight was measured in kilograms (kg), and height was measured in centimetres and then converted to metres. Both body weight and height were used to measure body mass index (BMI) in kg/m². Fat mass, skeletal muscle mass and fat-free mass were measured in both percentage and kilograms by using InBody Machine.

Countries

Malaysia

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSareena Hanim Hamzah, Associate Proffesor

Faculty of Sports and Exercise Science

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 5, 2026