Skip to content

Comparative Study on the Diagnostic Validity of the Alvarado Score, Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR), and Adult Appendicitis Score (AAS) in Acute Appendicitis at East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust (ELHT)

Comparative Study on the Diagnostic Validity of the Alvarado Score, Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR), and Adult Appendicitis Score (AAS) in Acute Appendicitis at East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust (ELHT)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07804238
Acronym
DV-AAA ELHT
Enrollment
300
Registered
2026-09-04
Start date
2026-04-13
Completion date
2026-07-28
Last updated
2026-09-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Appendicitis

Keywords

Acute appendicitis, Alvarado score, Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR) score, Adult Appendicitis Score (AAS), Diagnostic accuracy

Brief summary

This retrospective observational study aims to compare the diagnostic accuracy of Alvarado Score, Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR) Score, and Adult Appendicitis Score (AAS) in predicting histologically confirmed acute appendicitis in adult patients presenting to East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust (ELHT). The study will include all emergency patients aged 16 years and above, of any gender, admitted between June 2023 and June 2024 with clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis who subsequently underwent appendicectomy via laparoscopic or open approaches. For each patient, the Alvarado, AIR, and AAS scores will be calculated retrospectively using information from presenting symptoms, physical examination findings, and laboratory investigations recorded at the time of admission. These calculated scores will be compared against the final histopathology results, which serve as the gold standard for diagnosis. Diagnostic performance will be assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Sensitivity reflects the proportion of patients with appendicitis correctly identified by the score, while specificity measures the ability to correctly exclude those without the condition. PPV indicates the likelihood that a positive score truly represents acute appendicitis, whereas NPV represents the likelihood that a negative score accurately rules it out. Accurate and timely pre-operative diagnosis of acute appendicitis is essential to minimise the incidence of negative appendicectomies while avoiding unnecessary diagnostic investigations. This study also aims to determine the most effective scoring system for risk stratification in the local adult population, considering the demographic diversity, and to provide recommendations for the standardisation of appendicitis risk assessment tools in emergency surgical practice within the trust.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

* Patients of any gender * Patients aged 16 and above * Admitted as an emergency with suspected appendicitis * Must have undergone appendicectomy (laparoscopic, open, or laparotomy) from June 2023 to June 2024 at East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who have undergone elective, interval, or incidental appendicectomies. * Patients younger than 16

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnostic AccuracyFrom initial clinical assessment at presentation to histological diagnosis following appendicectomy, is up to 6 monthsWhich scoring system - Alvarado Score, Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR) Score or Adult Appendicitis Score (AAS) has the highest diagnostic accuracy for predicting histologically confirmed appendicitis among patients undergoing emergency appendicectomy? \[Diagnostic accuracy will be assessed by comparing their sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis and Area Under the Curve (AUC) will be presented to assess the overall discriminative performance.\]

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 5, 2026