Collaborative Clinical Reasoning
Conditions
Keywords
Collaborative Clinical Reasoning, Interprofessional collaboration, Low Back Pain, Primary Care
Brief summary
Low back pain is a major health problem in primary care and is associated with a substantial clinical, economic, and societal burden. Although evidence-based recommendations are available, its management remains heterogeneous, poorly coordinated, and often characterized by overmedicalization. In this context, interprofessional collaboration has been identified as a means of improving primary care but does not necessarily ensure a shared understanding of clinical situations. Collaborative Clinical Reasoning (CCR), defined as the process of developing a shared mental model among healthcare professionals and patient partners, remains insufficiently explored in primary care. This exploratory qualitative study aims to explore the representations and definitions of Collaborative Clinical Reasoning among general practitioners, physiotherapists, and patient partners with low back pain in French-speaking Belgium. It also aims to examine how CCR is implemented in primary care practice and to identify perceived barriers and facilitators to its implementation. Data will be collected through separate focus groups involving general practitioners, physiotherapists, and patient partners with low back pain. Qualitative data will be analyzed using inductive reflexive thematic analysis.
Interventions
OTHERFocus groups and deliberative workshop
General practitioners, physiotherapists, and patients will first participate in separate focus groups for each stakeholder group. A subsequent mixed deliberative workshop will bring together participants from the three stakeholder groups to discuss and refine the findings.
Sponsors
Université Catholique de Louvain
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
A. General Practitioners 1. Be a general practitioner or a physician in postgraduate training in general practice. 2. Practice general medicine in French-speaking Belgium. 3. Practice general medicine in primary care. B. Physiotherapists 1. Be a physiotherapist. 2. Practice physiotherapy in French-speaking Belgium. 3. Practice physiotherapy in primary care. C. Patients with low back pain 1. Age ≥18 years. 2. Have low back pain (pain between the lower margin of the ribs and the gluteal fold, with or without pain in one or both legs). 3. Have consulted both a general practitioner and a physiotherapist for this condition in primary care in French-speaking Belgium.
Exclusion criteria
A. General Practitioners 1\. Be on sick leave during the study (e.g., work incapacity) B. Physiotherapists 1. Practice exclusively in a nursing home or a nursing home with skilled nursing care. 2. Be on sick leave during the study (e.g., work incapacity). C. Patients with low back pain 1. Have a known specific lumbar pathology (e.g., fracture, infection, cancer, lumbar radiculopathy, etc). 2. Have a known general condition that may explain the low back pain (e.g., fibromyalgia, osteoporosis, rheumatologic disease, etc). 3. Have undergone back surgery within the past 12 months. 4. Be pregnant or have had a known pregnancy within the past 12 months. 5. Reside in a nursing home or a nursing home with skilled nursing care.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Participants' representations and definitions of Collaborative Clinical Reasoning, identified through reflexive thematic analysis. | From the initial focus groups to the subsequent deliberative workshop, over an estimated 15-month data collection period. | Participants' representations and definitions of Collaborative Clinical Reasoning will be explored through qualitative data collected during separate focus groups with general practitioners, physiotherapists, and patients with non-specific low back pain, as well as during a subsequent deliberative workshop bringing together these three participant groups. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Enactment of Collaborative Clinical Reasoning in primary care practice, identified through reflexive thematic analysis. | From the initial focus groups to the subsequent deliberative workshop, over an estimated 15-month data collection period. | The enactment of Collaborative Clinical Reasoning in primary care practice will be explored through qualitative data collected during separate focus groups with general practitioners, physiotherapists, and patients with non-specific low back pain, as well as during a subsequent deliberative workshop bringing together these three participant groups. |
| Barriers and facilitators to the enactment of Collaborative Clinical Reasoning in primary care practice, identified through reflexive thematic analysis. | From the initial focus groups to the subsequent deliberative workshop, over an estimated 15-month data collection period. | Barriers and facilitators influencing the enactment of Collaborative Clinical Reasoning in primary care practice will be explored through qualitative data collected during separate focus groups with general practitioners, physiotherapists, and patients with non-specific low back pain, as well as during a subsequent deliberative workshop bringing together these three participant groups. |
Countries
Belgium
Contacts
CONTACTOlivier Hunin, PT, Msc
CONTACTFranck Verschuren, MD, PhD
Outcome results
None listed