Adnexal Mass, Ovarian Mass
Conditions
Brief summary
Investigators developed an interactive agentic system designed to guide newly qualified sonographers in ovarian lesion scanning and improve their scanning quality and diagnostic performance toward expert-level standards. Our agentic system is capable of capturing key features including the max-diameter plane of ovarian lesions from dynamic ultrasound videos, translating these findings into standardized International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) descriptors, and providing multi-turn guidance for subsequent scanning, and ultimately generating an AI-assisted diagnostic assessment based on embedded expert knowledge. In this multicenter study, participants are asked to undergo gynecological ultrasonography performed by sonographers with less than 3 years of experience with or without AI assistance. Our researchers will compare the performance of operators working with AI against that of operators working without AI, as well as against the performance of expert sonographers, to see whether AI assistance enhances the proficiency of less experienced operators and help them approach the scanning quality and diagnostic accuracy of expert sonographers in real-world clinical scenarios.
Detailed description
This multicenter, prospective study will be conducted at tertiary cancer centers and primary healthcare institutions across China. Participants will be recruited from gynecological ultrasound clinics of each site. Each participant will undergo gynecological ultrasonography under both AI-assisted and unassisted conditions according to their group allocation. Following completion of the study examinations, expert sonographers with more than 10 years of experience, blinded to the scanning and diagnostic results of the junior sonographers, will independently perform a repeat gynecological ultrasound examination of each participant. Based solely on their independent examination, they will issue the final clinical report for each participant. The expert assessments will serve as one reference standard for evaluating scanning completeness, feature interpretation accuracy and diagnostic agreement. Histopathological findings, when available, or clinical follow-up for conservatively managed lesions will serve as the reference standard for evaluating diagnostic accuracy.
Interventions
OTHERnon-AI assisted and then AI assisted
Participants first undergo ultrasound scanning and diagnosis by a junior sonographer without AI assistance, followed by ultrasound scanning by the same sonographer with AI assistance.
OTHERAI assisted and then non-AI assisted
Participants first undergo ultrasound scanning and diagnosis by a junior sonographer with AI assistance, followed by ultrasound scanning by another junior sonographer without AI assistance. The two junior sonographers are blinded to each other's scanning and assessment results.
Sponsors
Women's Hospital School Of Medicine Zhejiang University
Shaoxing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Female aged 18-75 years * With suspected ovarian masses identified clinically or by previous imaging examination * Eligible for and able to undergo transvaginal or transabdominal ultrasonography * Agree to provide written informed consent before enrollment
Exclusion criteria
* No ovarian mass identified on ultrasound examination * Previous bilateral oophorectomy * Previous surgery or chemotherapy for ovarian cancer * Previous treatment for other malignant tumors * Presence of any psychiatric or psychological disorders that may prevent completion of the study procedures or follow-up * Concurrent participation in other clinical trials that may interfere with the outcomes of this study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Completeness of ultrasound feature acquisition | Up to 7 days from completion of the study | The completeness of ultrasound feature acquisition will be assessed with reference to national authoritative quality-control standards. After each examination, all stored ultrasound images and videos will be labeled according to their intended purpose. A feature will be considered adequately acquired when at least one stored image or video provides sufficient visual evidence for assessment of that feature. The proportion of required features successfully acquired will be calculated. The proportion of redundant stored images will also be recorded as an additional indicator of acquisition quality. |
| Accuracy of interpretation of individual ultrasound features | Up to 7 days from completion of the study | The accuracy of interpretation of ultrasound features will be assessed by comparing the assessments made by junior sonographers under AI-assisted and unassisted conditions with the findings independently acquired and interpreted by expert sonographers during a separate repeat ultrasound examination. The accuracy rate for each feature will be calculated. |
| Agreement between junior and expert sonographers in ultrasound diagnosis | Up to 7 days from completion of the study | Agreement between junior and expert sonographers will be assessed for the final diagnosis of ovarian lesions. The assessments made by junior sonographers under AI-assisted and unassisted conditions will be compared with the corresponding diagnoses independently obtained by expert sonographers during a separate repeat ultrasound examination, which will then be quantified using appropriate agreement statistics. |
| Diagnostic accuracy of ovarian tumors | Within 3 months after the ultrasonography examination | Diagnostic accuracy will be assessed against histopathological diagnosis as the golden reference standard. This outcome will be evaluated only in participants who undergo surgical treatment and have definitive histopathological findings based on paraffin-embedded surgical specimens. |
| Diagnostic performance of ovarian tumors | Within 3 months after the ultrasonography examination | Area under curve will be assessed against histopathological diagnosis as the golden reference standard. This outcome will be evaluated only in participants who undergo surgical treatment and have definitive histopathological findings based on paraffin-embedded surgical specimens. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Confidence in ultrasound feature acquisition and diagnosis | Up to 7 days from completion of the study | Sonographers' confidence in the completeness and adequacy of feature acquisition and in their final diagnostic assessment will be evaluated using a predefined rating scale as follows: 5 = very confident, 4 = confident, 3 = uncertain, 2 = less confident, and 1 = not confident at al. |
Countries
China
Contacts
CONTACTJiale Qin, Prof., Professor
CONTACTRuixia Dai, Ph.D. student
Outcome results
None listed