Skip to content

The Aim of the Study is to Characterize Patients Exhibiting Muscular Atrophy and Weakness Who Require a Muscle Biopsy for Diagnosis (IBM vs Atypical MND), Through an Innovative Technique Which Enables the Evaluation of the Neuromuscular Junction Involvement in Each Condition

Comparative Analysis of TDP-43 Pathology in Skeletal Muscle Biopsies With Electrostimulation for Enhanced Neuromuscular Junction Sampling in Patients Affected by Inclusion Body Myopathy (IBM) and Motor Neuron Disease (MND)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07796776
Acronym
TDP-signatures
Enrollment
30
Registered
2026-09-01
Start date
2026-07-01
Completion date
2030-07-01
Last updated
2026-09-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Inclusion Body Myositis (IBM), Motor Neuron Disease, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Keywords

tdp-43

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to characterize 30 patients exhibiting muscular atrophy and weakness who require a muscle biopsy for diagnosis (suspected inclusion body myopathy vs atypical motor neuron disease), through an innovative technique (a muscle biopsy with Electrostimulation for Enhanced Neuromuscular Junction sampling), to evaluate the involvement of the neuromuscular junction in each disease and to better characterize shared and divergent patterns of TDP-43 pathology within the peripheral nervous system in both disorders.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

IRCCS San Raffaele
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

* Patients exhibiting progressive muscle weakness and atrophy with a classic clinical IBM pattern or with an atypical clinical IBM pattern or with an atypical MND pattern * Able to understand and sign the informed consent * Treated according to standard of care clinical practice

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindications to needle EMG or skeletal muscle biopsy * Psychiatric diseases that may interfere with adherence to the follow-up protocol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnostic sensitivity of an integrated clinical, neurophysiological, metabolic and histopathological model in the differential diagnosis between IBM and MND.At the end of the follow-up period (24 months of follow-up)To achieve a diagnostic sensitivity of \>90% for the differential diagnosis between IBM and MND integrating clinical variables (site of onset, scales reflecting disease progression rate, muscle strength), neurophysiological indices (presence and degree of active denervation signs, presence of myopathic or neurogenic motor unit potentials), histopathological parameters (myopathic or neuropathic pattern of disease) and metabolic measures (hyper- vs hypo-metabolism) into a multivariable binary logistic regression model, using the final diagnosis confirmed during longitudinal follow-up as the reference standard.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To evaluate signs of muscle and neuromuscular junction (NMJ) involvement at neuropathological level in each diseaseAt the end of the follow-up period (24 months of follow-up)To investigate disease-specific histological signatures, comparing the pattern of fiber degeneration, the presence of inflammatory infiltrates, the presence of protein aggregation markers (such as pTDP-43) and their localization, the presence of mitochondrial changes (the percentage of age-exceeding number of COX-negative fibers) and the NMJ involvement by evaluating the presynaptic and postsynaptic integrity (quantified as the percentage of synaptophysin and Ach-R clustering, respectively) between IBM and MND (through Fisher's exact test or Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate) and to evaluate the prognostic role of each histological parameter (through Kaplan-Meier followed by log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards regression).

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 2, 2026