Skip to content

Full-Body and Lower-Limb Stretching on Explosive Power and Agility

Do Stretching Variations Affect Performance? A Comparison of Full-Body and Lower-Limb Stretching on Explosive Power and Agility Reaction Time

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07796464
Acronym
static stretch
Enrollment
60
Registered
2026-09-01
Start date
2026-04-01
Completion date
2027-02-28
Last updated
2026-09-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Static Stretching

Keywords

static stretching, agility, jump performance

Brief summary

Stretching is commonly used during warm-up and recovery and can influence flexibility, neuromuscular control, and joint range of motion. However, the acute effects of different stretching scopes on jump and agility performance remain unclear. This study will compare whole-body and lower-limb static stretching in 60 healthy university students randomly assigned to whole-body stretching, lower-limb stretching, or control groups. Each intervention will last 14 minutes. Jump performance will be assessed using the standing long jump, squat jump, countermovement jump, and drop jump with a Vmaxpro sensor, while agility will be evaluated using the T-Test and Hexagon Agility Test. The findings are expected to clarify how stretching scope influences acute physical performance and may inform warm-up and physical therapy strategies.

Detailed description

Stretching exercise is one of the most commonly used strategies for pre-exercise warm-up and post-exercise recovery, and its physiological effects involve muscle flexibility, neuromuscular control, and joint range of motion. However, empirical evidence regarding the acute effects of different stretching scopes on jumping ability and agility remains relatively limited, as most previous studies have focused on individual muscles or localized muscle groups. Therefore, the present study aims to investigate the effects of static stretching involving different body regions, specifically whole-body and lower-limb stretching, on explosive performance and agility. A pretest-intervention-posttest design will be adopted. A total of 60 healthy university students (30 males and 30 females) are expected to be recruited and randomly assigned to a whole-body stretching group (10 males and 10 females), a lower-limb stretching group (10 males and 10 females), or a control group (10 males and 10 females). The duration of the static stretching intervention will be standardized to 14 minutes. The whole-body stretching group will perform stretching exercises targeting the major muscle groups of the upper limbs, trunk, and lower limbs, whereas the lower-limb stretching group will focus on key lower-limb muscle groups, including the quadriceps, hamstrings, and gastrocnemius. The control group will remain seated quietly for 14 minutes without performing any stretching exercise. Participants will undergo a series of physical performance assessments before and after the intervention. Jump performance will be evaluated using the standing long jump, squat jump, countermovement jump, and drop jump. All jump-related data will be recorded using a Vmaxpro wireless inertial measurement sensor (BM Sports Technology GmbH, Germany), providing key parameters such as jump height, peak velocity, and peak power. Agility will be assessed using the T-Test and Hexagon Agility Test. It is hypothesized that excessive static stretching may cause an acute reduction in muscular strength and explosive performance. The whole-body stretching group may demonstrate only a slight decrease in jump performance while maintaining relatively stable agility performance, whereas the lower-limb stretching group may exhibit changes in both jump and agility performance. The findings of this study are expected to clarify the relationship between the scope of static stretching and subsequent physical performance and may provide evidence to support the design of pre-exercise warm-up strategies and physical therapy interventions.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

China Medical University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Healthy university students aged 20-30 years Regularly engaged in physical activity Not specialized in weightlifting or jumping disciplines Able to understand the study procedures and provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Acute lower-limb or low-back injury within the previous three months Fracture, sprain, or muscle strain within the previous three months Related surgery or medical treatment within the previous three months Pain, swelling, inflammation, or restricted movement on the day of testing Any condition that may compromise exercise safety Physician-advised restriction from moderate- to high-intensity exercise Cardiovascular disease or other exercise contraindications Neurological, musculoskeletal, or balance impairments that may affect test performance

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hexagon Agility Test Completion TimeFrom baseline to immediately after the 15-min interventionAgility performance will be assessed using the Hexagon Agility Test. Participants will complete two valid trials, and the mean completion time will be used for analysis. Completion time will be recorded in seconds, with a shorter time indicating better agility performance.
T-Test Agility Test Completion TimeFrom baseline to immediately after the 15-min interventionAgility performance will be assessed using the T-Test Agility Test. Participants will complete two trials, and completion time will be recorded in seconds using a photocell timing gate system. The mean completion time of the two trials will be used for analysis, with lower values indicating better agility performance.
Squat jump heightFrom baseline to immediately after the 15-min interventionSquat jump performance will be assessed using a wireless inertial measurement sensor. Participants will perform two valid squat jump trials, and the mean jump height will be used for analysis. Jump height will be recorded in centimeters, with higher values indicating better jump performance.
Countermovement Jump HeightFrom baseline to immediately after the 15-min interventionCountermovement jump performance will be assessed using a wireless inertial measurement sensor. Participants will perform two valid countermovement jump trials, and the mean jump height will be used for analysis. Jump height will be recorded in centimeters, with higher values indicating better jump performance.
Drop Jump Reactive Strength IndexFrom baseline to immediately after the 15-min interventionReactive strength during the drop jump will be assessed using a wireless inertial measurement sensor. The reactive strength index will be calculated as jump height divided by ground contact time. Participants will perform two valid trials, and the mean reactive strength index will be used for analysis. Values will be expressed in meters per second, with higher values indicating better reactive strength performance.
Standing Long Jump DistanceFrom baseline to immediately after the 15-min interventionHorizontal lower-limb explosive performance will be assessed using the standing long jump. Participants will perform two valid trials, and the mean jump distance will be used for analysis. Jump distance will be recorded in centimeters, with higher values indicating better performance.

Countries

Taiwan

Contacts

CONTACTYueh-Ling Hsieh, PhD
sherrie@mail.cmu.edu.tw886-0929122977
CONTACTLing-Ling Tang, BS
l0979087177@gmail.com886-0979087177

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 2, 2026