Skip to content

Rotational Stability of Two Soft Toric Contact Lens Designs

Comparison of Rotational Behavior of Soft Toric Contact Lenses With Different Stabilization Designs and Their Association With Ocular Biometric Parameters

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07795671
Enrollment
40
Registered
2026-08-31
Start date
2026-05-02
Completion date
2026-07-01
Last updated
2026-09-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Astigmatism

Keywords

toric contact lens, rotational stability, lens rotation, stabilization design, ocular biometry, soft contact lens

Brief summary

This study compared the rotational behavior of two commercially available soft toric contact lenses with different stabilization designs and explored whether ocular biometric and refractive characteristics were associated with lens rotation. Contact lens-naïve adults underwent baseline ocular biometry and were scheduled for two separate lens-fitting sessions in randomized order. Lens rotation was measured 30 minutes after insertion in primary, right, left, upward, and downward gaze using slit-lamp biomicroscopy. The study was designed as a two-period crossover comparison.

Interventions

DEVICEAcuvue Oasys for Astigmatism

Commercially available soft toric contact lens composed of senofilcon A, with an 8.6-mm base curve and 14.5-mm diameter, using an accelerated stabilization design.

DEVICEAir Optix for Astigmatism

Commercially available soft toric contact lens composed of lotrafilcon B, with an 8.7-mm base curve and 14.5-mm diameter, using a modified periballast stabilization design.

Sponsors

Bozok University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Participants were scheduled to receive both soft toric contact lens designs in two separate fitting sessions, with the order of lens application randomized by a simple draw of lots. The two sessions were separated by a 4-day interval. Because 16 participants did not attend the second session, the intended two-period crossover design was incomplete.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults with astigmatic refractive error suitable for correction with the -commercially available toric contact lenses used in the study * No prior experience with contact lens wear * Healthy ocular surface examination * Ability and willingness to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* History of corneal pathology * Previous ocular surgery * Active ocular disease * Systemic disease affecting the eyes

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Mean Absolute Contact Lens Rotation30 minutes after lens insertion during each fitting sessionAbsolute lens rotation was measured in degrees using slit-lamp biomicroscopy in five gaze positions (primary, right, left, upward, and downward gaze). For each lens design, the overall mean absolute rotation was calculated as the average of the absolute rotation measurements across the five gaze positions.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 2, 2026