Skip to content

Evaluating the Effectiveness and Safety of Microneedling With Topical Tranexamic Acid in Treatment of Striae Rubra

Evaluating the Effectiveness and Safety of Microneedling With Topical Tranexamic Acid in Treatment of Striae Rubra; Asplit Body Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07795515
Enrollment
50
Registered
2026-08-31
Start date
2026-10-01
Completion date
2027-06-01
Last updated
2026-09-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Striae Rubra

Brief summary

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of microneedling with topical tranexamic acid versus microneedling with placebo (normal saline) in the treatment of striae rubra. One side of the affected area (the intervention side) will receive topical tranexamic acid at a concentration of 100 mg/mL (Kapron® ampoules, 500 mg/5 mL; Amoun Pharmaceutical Co.), followed by a microneedling session. The contralateral side (the control side) will receive a placebo-specifically, 0.9% normal saline-followed by a microneedling session performed in the same manner as on the intervention side. Treatment sessions will be conducted every three weeks-up to a maximum of five sessions, depending on the patient's clinical improvement-at weeks 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12, for a total treatment duration of 12 weeks

Interventions

Topical tranexamic acid solution100 mg/mL (ampoule 500 mg/5 mL, Amoun Pharmaceutical Company) Microneedling will then be performed uniformly using multiple passes (horizontal, vertical, and oblique) on both sides of the affected area till erythema with pinpoint bleeding is achieved.

OTHERnormal saline (0.9% NaCl)

normal saline (0.9% NaCl) will be applied to the control side. Microneedling will then be performed uniformly using multiple passes (horizontal, vertical, and oblique) on both sides of the affected area till erythema with pinpoint bleeding is achieved

Sponsors

Sohag University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients of both gender aged ≥18 years, clinically and dermoscopically diagnosed with bilateral symmetrical striae rubra (present on corresponding anatomical sites on both sides of the body with approximately symmetrical distribution and similar clinical appearance (color, width, and stage of evolution)). and willing to participate and sign informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* • Striae alba. * Pregnancy or lactation. * History of keloids or hypertrophic scars. * Active skin infection in treatment area. * Patients using other modalities of treatment for over the last 3 months. * Patients with bleeding disorders or on anticoagulant therapy. * Patients using drugs that exacerbate the striae as systemic corticosteroids in the preceding 3 months or topical corticosteroid in the preceding one month.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in striae rubra severity assessed by Physician's Global Assessment-based quartile grading scaleAt baseline and at weeks 3, 6, 9, and 12Striae rubra severity will be assessed using a Physician's Global Assessment-based quartile grading scale, expressed as percentage response. The scale ranges from 0% to 100%, with higher values indicating a better treatment response. Responses are categorized as poor response (\<25%), mild response (25-50%), moderate response (50-75%), and excellent response (\>75%).

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

CONTACThager adel
hageradel0100@gmail.com01010207262

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 11, 2026