Skip to content

DAN-RELEASE - Reconsidering Long-Term Aspirin in the Elderly Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease

The RELEASE Trial: Reconsidering Long-Term Aspirin in the Elderly in Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07795398
Acronym
DAN-RELEASE
Enrollment
7000
Registered
2026-08-31
Start date
2026-09-14
Completion date
2029-10-01
Last updated
2026-09-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aspirin, Aspirin Causing Adverse Effects in Therapeutic Use, Chronic Coronary Syndrome, Coronary Artery Bypass Graft, Ischemic Heart Disease, Ischemic Heart Disease Chronic, Myocardial Infarction, Non-inferiority Trial, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Keywords

Ischemic heart disease, Chronic coronary syndrome

Brief summary

DAN-RELEASE is a national, randomized, registry-based trial including 7,000 participants in Denmark. The trial aims to determine whether discontinuation of long-term aspirin therapy is non-inferior to continued aspirin therapy in older adults with stable ischemic heart disease. Long-term aspirin therapy is recommended for patients with established ischemic heart disease. However, among clinically stable patients years after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), or myocardial infarction (MI), the evidence supporting lifelong aspirin therapy is limited. At the same time, the risk of serious bleeding increases with age. DAN-RELEASE will therefore compare aspirin discontinuation with continued aspirin therapy in adults aged 65 years or older with stable ischemic heart disease who have remained free from ischemic events for at least two years. The trial will assess whether discontinuing aspirin is non-inferior to continued treatment with respect to cardiovascular and bleeding outcomes.

Detailed description

Rationale: Current guidelines recommend life-long aspirin therapy in patients with chronic coronary syndrome. The evidence supporting long-term aspirin therapy after myocardial infarction (MI) and for chronic coronary syndrome stems primarily from trials conducted in the 1970s and 1980s. Since then, the clinical landscape of MI has evolved markedly: The use of highly sensitive cardiac troponins has led to the diagnosis of smaller MIs, coinciding with a shift from predominantly large ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) to smaller non-STEMI. Acute revascularization is now a part of the routine care for MI and many patients with stable coronary artery disease undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Population risk factors have improved, and universal use of statins have contributed to plaque stabilization and reduces progression of disease. As a result, long-term prognosis in patients with MI and chronic coronary syndromes has markedly improved. Therefore, the absolute ischemic benefit of long-term aspirin therapy may be attenuated, while the risk of bleeding, particularly in older patients, remains clinically relevant. These developments warrant a contemporary re-evaluation of the life-long role of aspirin in long-term secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease, especially in elderly patients with stable disease. Objective: To evaluate whether discontinuation of long-term aspirin in elderly patients with stable chronic coronary syndrome is non-inferior to continued aspirin therapy with respect to net clinical outcome. All clinical outcomes will be registry based except patient-reported outcomes. They will be assessed using questionnaires measuring bleeding symptoms, gastrointestinal discomfort, quality of life and lifestyle behaviour during follow-up. Trial design: Investigator-initiated, registry-based, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint (PROBE) non-inferiority trial with 1:1 allocation. The trial is conducted as a low-intervention clinical trial using nationwide Danish health registries as the primary data source. Risk-benefit considerations: Aspirin is widely used in secondary prevention and is available over the counter, reflecting its well established safety profile and the generally low risk associated with its use. Nevertheless, aspirin is associated with potential adverse effects, including bleeding, gastrointestinal discomfort, and clinically relevant drug interactions, particularly in elderly patients with comorbidities. Based on data from national health registries, the target population - older adults with stable chronic coronary syndrome - represents a clinically stable group with a low event rate of ischemic events. Given that lifelong aspirin therapy is often continued without systematic reassessment, there is a clear ethical justification for evaluating whether continuation remains beneficial - and safe - in an aging population with changing comorbidity profiles.

Interventions

DRUGContinuation of daily low-dose Aspirin

Participants randomized to this intervention will continue their current daily low-dose aspirin therapy.

DRUGDiscontinuation of daily low-dose Aspirin

Participants randomized to this intervention will discontinue their current daily low-dose aspirin therapy.

Sponsors

Odense University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER
University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Participants are randomized 1:1 to continuation or discontinuation of low-dose aspirin.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥65 years at randomization * Ischemic heart disease (IHD) with index event (myocardial infarction (MI), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)) \>2 years previously * Since index event free from ischemic cardiovascular events (MI, ischemic stroke, or transitory ischemic attack) or any coronary revascularization procedure (PCI/CABG) * Currently treated with low dose aspirin (≤150 mg daily)

Exclusion criteria

* History of ischemic stroke * Active treatment with or indication for anti-coagulant or P2Y12-inhibitor therapy * Indication for antiplatelet treatment other than secondary prevention of IHD according to treating physician (i.e. haematological diseases, peripheral artery disease) * Any revascularization procedure for peripheral artery disease * Any history of stent thrombosis or stenting of the left main coronary artery * Other contraindications to aspirin discontinuation according to treating physician * Not being able to understand Danish

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hierarchical Composite of Cardiovascular and Bleeding EventsFrom randomization until the end of the study, with a minimum follow-up of 1 yearA hierarchical composite endpoint using a win-ratio framework combining cardiovascular death, fatal bleeding, intracranial bleeding, Myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and bleeding events (BARC 3-5).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cardiovascular DeathFrom randomization until the end of the study, with a minimum follow-up of 1 yearDeath due to a cardiovascular cause.
Fatal Bleeding (BARC Type 5)From randomization until the end of the study, with a minimum follow-up of 1 yearFatal bleeding classified as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 5.
Intracranial Bleeding (BARC Type 3c)From randomization until the end of the study, with a minimum follow-up of 1 yearIntracranial bleeding classified as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3c.
Ischemic StrokeFrom randomization until the end of the study, with a minimum follow-up of 1 yearOccurrence of ischemic stroke during follow-up.
Myocardial InfarctionFrom randomization until the end of the study, with a minimum follow-up of 1 yearOccurrence of myocardial infarction during follow-up.
Other Major Bleeding (BARC Types 3a and 3b)From randomization until the end of the study, with a minimum follow-up of 1 yearMajor bleeding classified as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) types 3a or 3b.
All-Cause MortalityFrom randomization until the end of the study, with a minimum follow-up of 1 yearDeath from any cause during follow-up.
Hospitalization for Cardiovascular CausesFrom randomization until the end of the study, with a minimum follow-up of 1 yearHospitalization due to cardiovascular causes during follow-up.
Peptic UlcerFrom randomization until the end of the study, with a minimum follow-up of 1 yearOccurrence of peptic ulcer during follow-up.
Minor BleedingFrom randomization until the end of the study, with a minimum follow-up of 1 yearPatient-reported bleeding symptoms will be assessed using a modified version of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Scientific and Standardization Committee Bleeding Assessment Tool (ISTH/SSC-BAT). The questionnaire is used to collect information on bleeding symptoms not available from national health registries.
Abdominal Pain and DiscomfortBaseline and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after randomizationPatient-reported abdominal pain and gastrointestinal discomfort during follow-up, including symptom burden and impact on daily life. Individual questionnaire items are assessed separately, and no overall scale score is calculated.
Angina Symptoms, Frequency, and Physical Limitations (Seattle Angina Questionnaire)Baseline and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after randomizationPatient-reported angina symptoms, frequency, and physical limitations assessed using the 7-item Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-7). Scores are transformed to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health status and fewer limitations due to angina.
Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L)Baseline and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after randomizationPatient-reported health-related quality of life assessed using the EQ-5D-5L (EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level) questionnaire. The descriptive system covers five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is rated on five levels, ranging from no problems (level 1) to extreme problems or inability (level 5), with higher levels indicating worse health status. The responses to the five dimensions are combined into a five-digit health state. The direct sum of the 5 individual dimension scores. Higher means worse health status. The EQ Visual Analogue Scale (EQ VAS) records the participant's self-rated health on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst health imaginable and 100 represents the best health imaginable. Higher EQ VAS scores indicate better self-rated health.

Countries

Denmark

Contacts

CONTACTAxel Diederichsen, Professor
Axel.Diederichsen@rsyd.dk+4540191227
CONTACTEva Prescott, Professor
eva.irene.bossano.prescott@regionh.dk+4540262134

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 10, 2026