Skip to content

Comparative Effect of Conventional and 3D-printed Twin Block Appliances on Soft Tissue Changes

Comparative Effect of Conventional and 3D-printed Twin Block Appliances on Soft Tissue Changes

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07795138
Acronym
Clinic Radiogr
Enrollment
20
Registered
2026-08-31
Start date
2024-01-01
Completion date
2026-03-01
Last updated
2026-09-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Class II Malocclusion

Keywords

Class II malocclusion, functional treatment, growth modification, Twin block, Lower lip, Soft tissue changes

Brief summary

: To evaluate the effectiveness of functional device treatment using both 3D-printed and conventional Twin Block appliances on soft tissue changes during growth modification in Class II malocclusion.

Detailed description

Background: Enhancing facial aesthetics is the main target of orthodontic treatment, as appearance greatly influences a person's social confidence and self-esteem. Skeletal Class II malocclusion is quite common, and the pubertal growth spurt is the perfect time for functional treatment to promote mandibular advancement. The Twin-Block, one of the most widely used functional appliances, is a popular choice for achieving this goal.. Patients and methods: Twenty patients divided into two groups with mixed or early permanent dentition were enrolled. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken at the start (T0; before treatment) and end (T1; at the end of the active phase) using the same machine. Those of each patient treated with a conventional Twin Block appliance for class II malocclusion were compared to those of patients treated with a 3D-printed Twin Block appliance for a 6-month follow-up period. Both groups were evaluated for soft tissue changes using various angular and linear geometric measurements, and differences between pre- and post-treatment were analyzed with a paired t-test.

Interventions

Functional Device

Sponsors

Al-Azhar University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

double blind

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
9 Years to 16 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Young, growing age 2. Class II malocclusion 3. Increased overjet.

Exclusion criteria

1. Severe proclination of anterior teeth. 2. Severe crowding of anterior teeth. 3. Systemic disease affecting bone and growth.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lateral cephalometric radiographsBaseline and 6 months after treatmentangular degree

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 2, 2026