Skip to content

Study to Assess Adverse Events and How Effective NOA LIFT is Compared to JUVÉDERM VOLIFT With Lidocaine for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds in Adults

A Prospective Multi-Center, Evaluator- and Subject- Blinded, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of NOA LIFT Compared to JUVÉDERM VOLIFT With Lidocaine for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07794878
Enrollment
288
Registered
2026-08-31
Start date
2026-08-19
Completion date
2028-08-01
Last updated
2026-08-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nasolabial Folds

Keywords

Nasolabial Folds, NOA LIFT, JUVÉDERM VOLIFT, Lidocaine

Brief summary

Nasolabial folds (NLFs) are wrinkles that run from the sides of the nose to the corners of the mouth. The goal of this study is to evaluate how safe and effective NOA LIFT is compared to JUVÉDERM VOLIFT with Lidocaine for correcting moderate to severe nasolabial folds in adults. NOA LIFT and JUVÉDERM VOLIFT with Lidocaine are hyaluronic acid-based dermal fillers being evaluated for the treatment of nasolabial folds. Participants are randomly placed into 1 of 2 treatment groups. There is a 2 in 3 chance that participants will be assigned to the NOA LIFT group and a 1 in 3 chance of being assigned to the VOLIFT group. Around 288 adult participants with moderate to severe nasolabial folds will be enrolled at multiple sites in China. Participants will receive deep dermis injections of either NOA LIFT or JUVÉDERM VOLIFT. The study duration is approximately 12 months after the initial treatment. There may be higher treatment burden for participants in this trial compared to their standard of care due to study procedures. Participants will attend regular visits during the study at a hospital or clinic. The effects of the treatment will be checked by medical assessments, vital signs, laboratory tests, vision assessments, checking for side effects, and completing questionnaires.

Interventions

DRUGNOA LIFT

Injection

DRUGJUVÉDERM VOLIFT with Lidocaine

Injection

Sponsors

AbbVie
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\- Moderate (2) or Severe (3) on the 5-point Nasolabial Fold Severity Scale (NLFSS) for each nasolabial fold (NLF) on evaluator live assessment (both sides must qualify and have the same score)

Exclusion criteria

* Current cutaneous or mucosal inflammatory or infectious processes, abscess, unhealed wound, or cancerous or precancerous lesion in the treatment area(s). * Current enrollment in an investigational drug or device study or participation in such a study within 30 days before enrollment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Responder Status Based on Evaluating Investigator's Live Assessment of Nasolabial Fold Severity Scale (NLFSS)Month 6The NLFSS is a validated 5-point scale used to assess the severity of nasolabial folds, where higher scores indicate more severe folds.
Number of Participants With Adverse EventsUp to approximately 13 monthsAn adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Responder Status Based on Evaluating Investigator's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) in Nasolabial Folds (NLFs)Month 6A responder is defined as a participant with improvement in the GAIS in NLF (defined as improved or much improved in GAIS). The GAIS is used to assess aesthetic improvement, with higher ratings indicating greater improvement.
Percentage of Participants With Responder Status Based on Participant's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) in Nasolabial Folds (NLFs)Month 6A responder is defined as a participant with improvement in the GAIS in NLF (defined as improved or much improved in GAIS). The GAIS is used by participants to assess their own aesthetic improvement, with higher ratings indicating greater improvement.
Change From Baseline in the Overall Score of FACE-Q - Appraisal of Lines: Nasolabial FoldsUp to Month 6The FACE-Q - Appraisal of Lines: Nasolabial Folds is a patient-reported outcome measure assessing satisfaction with nasolabial fold appearance. Higher scores indicate better outcomes.

Countries

China

Contacts

CONTACTABBVIE CALL CENTER
abbvieclinicaltrials@abbvie.com844-663-3742
STUDY_DIRECTORABBVIE INC.

AbbVie

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 1, 2026