Skip to content

Balloon- Versus Self-Expanding Intraannular TAVI in Small Aortic Annuli

Balloon- Versus Self-Expanding Intraannular TAVI in Small Aortic Annuli

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07794306
Acronym
BALANCE
Enrollment
510
Registered
2026-08-31
Start date
2026-10-26
Completion date
2033-12-31
Last updated
2026-08-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aortic Valve Stenosis

Keywords

TAVI, TAVR, Aortic valve stenosis, Bioprostheses, Transcatheter Heart Valves, Balloon-expanding, Self-expanding, Aortic annulus, Hemodynamics

Brief summary

In Europe TAVI is now recommended for treatment of aortic valve stenosis from the age of 70 years. When performing TAVI in young patients, lifetime management becomes important in terms of anticipated TAVI-in-TAVI procedures when valve deterioration occures. Especially small aortic annuli represent a special challenge in terms of postprocedural hemodynamics, however intra-annular transcatheter heart valve designs should be the devices of choice to facilitate future TAVI-in-TAVI procedures. Which intra-annular valve design offers ideal clinical and hemodynamic efficacy is unclear. Therefore, an investigator-initiated, randomized controlled trial (BALANCE trial: Balloon- vs. Self-expanding intraannular TAVI in small aortic annuli) was created to elucidate this topic.

Detailed description

This is a prospective, multi-center, national, randomized controlled, post-market trial. The primary objectives of the trial are to demonstrate clinical and hemodynamic non-inferiority of the Octapro+ System when compared to subjects treated with the Navitor System at 30 days and12 months post-procedure. Subjects will be randomized on a 2:1 basis to receive TAVI with either a Meril Balloon-expanding (BE) intraannular Transcatheter Heart Valve (THV) or an Abbott Self-expanding (SE) intraannular THV. Data will be collected at pre- and post-procedure, at discharge, at 30 days, and once a year until the 5-year follow-up is completed. Product Names: * Meril Octapro+ THV System, (Commercially available in Germany) * Abbott Navitor/ Navitor Vision THV System (Commercially available in Europe/US.) Currently, there is no comparative evidence for clinical and hemodynamic efficacy of the two available intra-annular THV principles (BE vs. SE) for treatment of AS in patients with small aortic annuli.

Interventions

DEVICEMeril Octapro+ THV System

TAVI treatment with Meril Octapro+ THV System

DEVICEAbbott Navitor/Navitor Vision THV system

TAVI treatment with Abbott Navitor/Navitor Vision System

Sponsors

Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants 18 years of age or older * Heart team consensus that isolated transfemoral TAVI is medically justified and advisable * Diagnosis of severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis and aortic annulus ≤ 430 mm² as seen in preoperative CT diagnostic * Anatomy is suitable for both BE and SE THVs according to Heart Team judgement * Participant provided written informed consent to participate in the trial * Ability of participant to understand patient information and to personally sign and date informed consent to participate in trial, before performing any trial-related procedures * Participant and treating physician agree that participant will return for all required postprocedural follow-up visits

Exclusion criteria

* Uni- or bicuspid aortic valve pathology * Severe Left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) calcification with prohibitive risk for BE THV as determined by heart team * Non-calcified aortic valve pathology or endocarditis * Expected life expectancy \<12 months due to associated non-cardiac comorbidities * Currently participating in another investigational drug or device trial * Urgent or emergency TAVI

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Early Safety according to VARC-3 Criteria30 Days* Freedom from all-cause mortality * Freedom from all stroke * Freedom from VARC type 2-4 bleeding * Freedom from major vascular, access-related, or cardiac structural complication * Freedom from acute kidney injury stage 3 or 4 * Freedom from moderate or severe aortic regurgitation * Freedom from new permanent pacemaker due to procedure-related conduction abnormalities * Freedom from surgery or intervention related to the device

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hemodynamic performance (Mean aortic gradient)12 Months and 5 Years\- Transvalvular mean pressure gradient ( mmHg, Continuous Variable)
Paravalvular leakage ≥ moderate12 months and 5 yearsRate of significant paravalvular leakage (≥ moderate)
Freedom from All-cause mortality, Disabling stroke and Rehospitalization5 YearsComposite Endpoint
Rate of Bioprosthetic valve failure and dysfunction (Combined endpoint)5 Years* Valve mean gradient of 20 mm Hg or higher * Incidence of Nonstructural valve dysfunction, defined as severe prosthesis-patient mismatch or at least moderate aortic regurgitation * Incidence of Clinical valve thrombosis; endocarditis * Incidence of Aortic-valve reintervention
Rate of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation5 YearsImplantation of a Permanent Pacemaker due to Conduction disturbances
Rate of Any Stroke5 YearsMinor, Major and Disabling Stroke
New York Heart Association functional class compared to baseline5 YearsSymptom relief (Dyspnea)
Left ventricular ejection fraction compared to baseline5 YearsLeft Ventricular Function parameter
Length of hospital stay at discharge30 DaysLength of hospital stay at discharge
Technical success according to VARC-3 criteria30 Days* Freedom from mortality * Successful access, delivery of device and retrieval of the delivery system * Correct positioning of a single prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomical location * Freedom from surgery or intervention related to the device or to a major vascular or access-related, or cardiac structural complication
Device success according to VARC-3 criteria30 Days* Technical success * Freedom from mortality * Freedom from surgery or intervention related to the device or to a major vascular or access-related, or cardiac structural complication * Intended performance of the valve (mean gradient \< 20 mm Hg, peak velocity \< 3 m/s, Doppler velocity index ≥ 0.25, and less than moderate aortic regurgitation
Rate of New onset of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter30 DaysNew onset of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter

Countries

Germany

Contacts

CONTACTAndreas Schaefer, PD Dr. med.
and.schaefer@uke.de+4915222816250

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 1, 2026