Skip to content

Early EIT-Guided PEEP Titration on Pulmonary Physiology in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe ARDS Undergoing Prone Positioning (EIT-PEEP-PRONE)

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Early EIT-Guided PEEP Titration on Pulmonary Physiology in Moderate-to-Severe ARDS Patients Undergoing Prone Positioning

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07793565
Acronym
EIT-PEEP-PRONE
Enrollment
40
Registered
2026-08-28
Start date
2026-08-31
Completion date
2027-06-30
Last updated
2026-08-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)

Brief summary

Background: Electrical impedance tomography (EIT)-guided PEEP titration has been shown to improve regional ventilation distribution, increase respiratory system compliance, and reduce mechanical power in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), but its effect on mortality remains unproven. In patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS, prone positioning for 4 hours allows pulmonary ventilation and perfusion to reach a new steady state, with optimization of ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) matching and other pulmonary physiological parameters. However, whether dynamic PEEP titration guided by EIT at this time point can further optimize V/Q matching and other pulmonary physiological parameters compared with conventional methods has not been reported. Objective: To investigate whether EIT-guided PEEP titration performed at 4 hours after prone positioning initiation can further optimize V/Q matching and other pulmonary physiological parameters in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS undergoing prone positioning. Methods: This is a prospective, single-center, randomized, open-label, parallel-controlled physiological study. A total of 40 patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS (Berlin definition, PaO₂/FiO₂ \< 150 mmHg) will be enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the EIT-guided group or the control group. PEEP intervention will be performed at 4 hours after prone positioning initiation (T1) in both groups: the EIT group receives EIT-guided PEEP titration, while the control group receives PEEP set according to the ARDSNet/PEEP-FiO₂ table. The primary outcome is V/Q matching percentage assessed by EIT at 18 hours of prone positioning (T2) and 6 hours after supine repositioning (T3). Secondary outcomes include respiratory mechanics, EIT-derived parameters (regional ventilation distribution, global inhomogeneity index, center of ventilation), oxygenation indices, echocardiographic measures of cardiac function, and clinical outcomes (28-day mortality, ventilator-free days, ICU length of stay, etc.). Conclusion: This study will provide physiological evidence for early EIT-guided PEEP titration in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS undergoing prone positioning, and will lay the foundation for future large-scale clinical trials.

Interventions

OTHEREIT-Guided PEEP Titration Group

PEEP titration is performed during mechanical ventilation to optimize respiratory mechanics and ventilation-perfusion matching in patients with ARDS.

OTHERARDSNet/PEEP-FiO₂ Table

PEEP will be set according to the ARDSNet/PEEP-FiO₂ table at 4 hours after prone positioning initiation (T1).

Sponsors

XIE MIN
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Diagnosis of moderate-to-severe ARDS according to the Berlin definition, with a PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio \< 150 mmHg on optimal mechanical ventilation. 2. Clinical decision has been made to place a central venous catheter (internal jugular or subclavian vein) for clinical management.

Exclusion criteria

1. Pregnancy or postpartum state. 2. BMI \> 35 kg/m². 3. Duration of invasive mechanical ventilation \> 48 hours at enrollment. 4. Severe hemodynamic instability (mean arterial pressure \< 65 mmHg on norepinephrine ≥ 0.5 μg/kg/min). 5. Immediate need for veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) at enrollment. 6. Contraindications to prone positioning or EIT monitoring, including but not limited to: facial or cervical trauma; unstable spinal, femoral, pelvic, or rib fractures; recent cardiac surgery; pneumothorax; elevated intracranial pressure; pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; severe chronic lung disease (e.g., severe COPD, asthma, interstitial lung disease); severe cardiac dysfunction (New York Heart Association Class III or IV, acute coronary syndrome, sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia, or cardiogenic shock). 7. Lack of informed consent from legally authorized representative.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ventilation-Perfusion (V/Q) Matching PercentageAt 18 hours of prone positioning (T2) and at 6 hours after supine repositioning (T3)V/Q matching percentage assessed by electrical impedance tomography (EIT) using the EIT Evaluation Tool (SDMI) V2.7.1. V/Q matching reflects the efficiency of pulmonary gas exchange and is calculated from regional ventilation and perfusion distribution maps.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Respiratory System ComplianceBaseline, T2 (18h prone), and T3 (6h post-supine)Respiratory system compliance (Crs) calculated as tidal volume divided by driving pressure (plateau pressure minus PEEP), measured under volume-controlled ventilation.
Driving PressureAt baseline (T0), at 18 hours of prone positioning (T2), and at 6 hours after supine repositioning (T3)Driving pressure (DP) calculated as plateau pressure (Pplat) minus PEEP, measured under volume-controlled ventilation.
EIT-Derived Regional Ventilation DistributionAt baseline (T0), at 18 hours of prone positioning (T2), and at 6 hours after supine repositioning (T3)Regional ventilation distribution assessed by EIT, expressed as percentage of tidal impedance variation in four regions of interest (ROIs): ventral (ROI 1), mid-ventral (ROI 2), mid-dorsal (ROI 3), and dorsal (ROI 4), each corresponding to 25% of the anteroposterior diameter, Center of Ventilation (CoV), Global Inhomogeneity Index (GI), Shunt, Dead Space.
RVEDA/LVEDAAt baseline (T0) and at 6 hours after supine repositioning (T3)Right Ventricular End-Diastolic Area to Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Area Ratio
RVFACBaseline and 6h post-supine repositioning (T3)Right Ventricular Fractional Area Change(%)
TAPSEBaseline and 6h post-supine repositioning (T3)Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion (mm)
TRVmaxBaseline and 6h post-supine repositioning (T3)Maximal Tricuspid Regurgitation Velocity (m/s)
LVEFAt baseline (T0) and at 6 hours after supine repositioning (T3)Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction(%)
SVBaseline and 6h post-supine repositioning (T3)Stroke Volume(ml)
COBaseline and 6h post-supine repositioning (T3)Cardiac Output (L/min)
28-Day MortalityAt 28 days after enrollmentAll-cause mortality within 28 days after enrollment.
Ventilator-Free Days at 28 DaysAt 28 days after enrollmentNumber of days alive and free from invasive mechanical ventilation during the first 28 days after enrollment.
ICU Length of StayFrom enrollment through ICU discharge, assessed up to 28 daysTotal duration of ICU stay (in days) from enrollment to ICU discharge or death.
Incidence of ECMO UseDuring the ICU stay, assessed up to 28 daysProportion of patients requiring veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) during the ICU stay.
Incidence of TracheostomyDuring the ICU stay, assessed up to 28 days.Proportion of patients undergoing tracheostomy during the ICU stay.

Countries

China

Contacts

CONTACTMin Xie, MD, PhD
Xie_m@126.com+86-27-83665204
CONTACTJianmin Ling, MD
2018tj5179@hust.edu.cn
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMin Xie

Tongji Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 29, 2026