Skip to content

Postpartum Effects of Mirror Therapy During Labor

"Recognize Your Strength: The Effects of Mirror Therapy Applied During Labor on Postpartum Pain, Mood, and Emotional Well-Being: A Randomized Controlled Trial"

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07792629
Enrollment
86
Registered
2026-08-28
Start date
2026-08-01
Completion date
2027-02-27
Last updated
2026-09-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Labor, Labor Anxiety, Labor Delivery, Labor Pain and to Reduce Pain

Keywords

Mirror Therapy,, Childbirth,, Mood,, Postpartum

Brief summary

Today, childbirth is considered one of the most physically and psychologically intense experiences in a woman's life. Labor is a critical period during which fear, anxiety, and stress related to childbirth may increase, potentially affecting both the course of labor and postpartum emotional well-being. Supportive approaches implemented during this period may contribute to a more positive perception of the childbirth experience and enhance postpartum well-being. Mirror therapy is a non-pharmacological approach that enables individuals to visually perceive their own bodies and the ongoing process, thereby strengthening self-perception and promoting positive body awareness. The use of mirror therapy during labor may increase women's active participation in the childbirth process and enhance their sense of control. It may also support emotional well-being and reduce negative emotional states during the postpartum period. Accordingly, this study aims to evaluate the effects of mirror therapy administered during labor on postpartum pain, mood, and emotional well-being. The findings are expected to contribute to strengthening midwifery support during childbirth, integrating non-pharmacological approaches into clinical practice, promoting their wider use, and protecting women's psychological well-being. Thus, the study is expected to provide scientific evidence that may inform midwifery education and practice as well as postpartum care policies.

Interventions

OTHERMirror Therapy

Mirror Therapy Application

Sponsors

NURTEN ÖZÇALKAP
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Women aged 18 years or older, * Able to read and write in Turkish, * Admitted for vaginal delivery, * Willing to participate voluntarily in the study, * Providing written informed consent by signing the "Informed Voluntary Consent Form."

Exclusion criteria

* Having difficulty communicating, * Having a high-risk pregnancy (e.g., hypertension, diabetes), * Experiencing complications during labor or delivery (e.g., emergency cesarean section, fetal distress).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Descriptive Information Form:baselineThis form was developed by the researchers and includes questions regarding the participants' demographic and obstetric characteristics.
Emotional Well-Being Scale: Baseline (before the intervention)Baseline (before the intervention), Immediately after the interventionThe Psychological Well-Being Scale was developed by Diener et al. (2010) and adapted into Turkish by Telef (2013). The scale consists of eight items within a single-factor structure and is rated on a 7-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 to 7. The single-factor structure explains 42% of the total variance, with factor loadings ranging from .54 to .76. The Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient of the scale was reported as .80 (Telef, 2013, p. 381).
Visual Analog Scale (VAS):Baseline (before the intervention), Immediately after the interventionThe Visual Analog Scale is a unidimensional instrument used to assess the participant's perceived pain intensity by converting a subjective experience into a quantitative value. The VAS consists of a 100-mm (10-cm) horizontal line, with one endpoint representing "no pain" (0) and the other representing the "worst possible pain" (10). Participants are asked to mark the point on the line that best represents the intensity of their current pain. The distance between the "no pain" endpoint and the participant's mark is measured using a ruler and recorded in centimeters, with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity. VAS scores are interpreted according to the predefined pain-intensity categories used in the study (Ergin, 2013; Aslan, 2006; Mucuk, 2009).

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

CONTACTyağlu
yoret@yoret.org.tr0542 466 58 20
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORBÜŞRA YAĞLU, Midwife
STUDY_DIRECTORNurten OZCALKAP, asisst. prof

Agri Ibrahim Cecen University

STUDY_CHAIRGizem Barakanlı, Midwife

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 2, 2026