Skip to content

GMPA Versus PPI for Gastric Protection and aGVHD Risk

Comparative Effect of Proton Pump Inhibitors and Gastric Mucosal Protective Agents on Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease Post-Transplantation: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07791849
Enrollment
198
Registered
2026-08-28
Start date
2026-09-15
Completion date
2028-12-31
Last updated
2026-08-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

aGVHD, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT), Infection, Microbiome, Mortality

Keywords

hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, PPI, GMPA, acute graft versus host disease, microbiome

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to observe whether different gastric protection strategies affect the incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are routinely used for gastric protection during transplantation, but their prolonged use may suppress gastric acid, alter gut microbiota, and potentially increase the risk of aGVHD. Teprenone, a gastric mucosal protective agent (GMPA), enhances mucosal defense mechanisms including promoting mucus secretion, increasing gastric mucosal blood flow, and facilitating epithelial cell repair, without affecting gastric acid secretion, and may therefore preserve microbial diversity and modify aGVHD risk. This study compares two strategies: continuous PPI use versus switching from PPIs to teprenone after transplantation. The main questions this study aims to answer are: * Does switching from PPIs to teprenone after transplantation reduce the cumulative incidence of aGVHD within +100 days post-transplantation compared with continuous PPI use? * What adverse events do participants experience with teprenone versus continuous PPI therapy? * Does teprenone therapy provide better preservation of gut microbial diversity and lower rates of gastrointestinal and infectious complications compared with continuous PPI use? In this prospective, randomized, parallel-controlled, single-center trial, approximately 198 patients undergoing allo-HSCT will be enrolled and assigned in a 1:1 ratio using a central randomization system. The experimental group (teprenone group) will receive standard-dose PPIs (esomeprazole, 40 mg/d, intravenous/oral) during conditioning and switch to teprenone (50 mg tid, orally) after transplantation through day +100. The control group (PPI group) will receive continuous standard-dose PPIs from conditioning through day +100. Probiotic use is prohibited from conditioning through day +100 in both groups. All other anti-infective, GVHD prophylaxis, and supportive care regimens are identical between the two groups. The primary endpoint of this study is the cumulative incidence of aGVHD within +100 days post-transplantation. Secondary endpoints include grade II-IV and grade III-IV aGVHD, lower gastrointestinal aGVHD, steroid-refractory aGVHD, gut and salivary microbiome dynamics (α-diversity, β-diversity, and specific taxa at pre-conditioning, day 0, day +14, and day +28), plasma biomarkers related to intestinal barrier integrity, systemic inflammation, and immune regulation , infectious and gastrointestinal complications (febrile neutropenia, diarrhea, C. difficile infection, bacteremia, EBV/CMV reactivation, upper GI bleeding, reflux), and 1-year survival outcomes (non-relapse mortality, overall survival, GVHD-free/relapse-free survival). During the study, participants will: * Receive the assigned gastric protection regimen (teprenone or PPI) according to randomization * Undergo regular assessments for safety and efficacy monitoring, including aGVHD surveillance and infection screening * Provide fecal and saliva samples at pre-conditioning, day 0, day +14, and day +28 post-transplantation for microbiome analysis * Provide peripheral blood samples at pre-conditioning, day 0, day +14, and day +28 post-transplantation for exploratory analysis * Be followed for up to 1 year post-transplantation

Interventions

Teprenone acts by enhancing gastric mucosal defense mechanisms, including promoting mucus secretion, increasing gastric mucosal blood flow, and facilitating epithelial cell repair, without affecting gastric acid secretion. The switch from PPI to teprenone is intended to maintain gastric protection while potentially preserving gut microbial diversity and reducing the risk of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD).

DRUGEsomeprazole

Continuous PPI use suppresses gastric acid secretion throughout the peri-transplantation period, which may alter gut microbiota composition and potentially influence aGVHD risk.

Sponsors

First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age 12-70 years; 2. First allogeneic haploidentical HSCT for hematological malignancy; 3. Treated with a standardized myeloablative conditioning and GVHD prophylaxis regimen; 4. ECOG performance status ≤2 prior to transplant; 5. Written informed consent obtained.

Exclusion criteria

1. Pre-existing conditions requiring continuous PPI therapy prior to transplant, including severe reflux esophagitis, Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, active peptic ulcer with bleeding, or long-term use of dual antiplatelet agents or oral anticoagulants; 2. Known active, untreated Helicobacter pylori infection prior to transplant; 3. Active infectious enteritis or Clostridioides difficile infection prior to transplant; 4. Use of systemic broad-spectrum antibiotics within 7 days prior to transplant; 5. Use of probiotics within 14 days prior to transplant; 6. Planned total enteral nutrition or oral glutamine supplementation during the study period; 7. Planned parenteral nutrition for ≥7 consecutive days; 8. Inability to provide saliva or stool samples for collection; 9. Pregnant or lactating women; 10. History of significant neurological or psychiatric disorders (e.g., epilepsy, dementia) that may interfere with study participation; 11. Life expectancy \<3 months or severe end-organ dysfunction; 12. Any other condition that, in the investigator's judgment, may compromise patient safety, compliance, or the validity of study results.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) post-transplantationFrom Day 0 to Day +100 post-transplantation, or until death or loss to follow-up, whichever came first

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Incidence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD)From Day 0 to Day +100 post-transplantation, or until death or loss to follow-up, whichever came first
Incidence of grade III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD)From Day 0 to Day +100 post-transplantation, or until death or loss to follow-up, whichever came first
Incidence of lower gastrointestinal aGVHDFrom Day 0 to Day +100 post-transplantation, or until death or loss to follow-up, whichever came first
Oral microbiome diversity and compositionAt pre-conditioning, Day +0, Day +14, and Day +28 post-transplantation
Fecal microbiome diversity and compositionAt pre-conditioning, Day +0, Day +14, and Day +28 post-transplantation
Incidence of febrile neutropeniaFrom Day 0 to Day +100 post-transplantation, or until death or loss to follow-up, whichever came first
Incidence of diarrheaFrom Day 0 to Day +100 post-transplantation, or until death or loss to follow-up, whichever came first
Incidence of Clostridioides difficile infectionFrom Day 0 to Day +100 post-transplantation, or until death or loss to follow-up
Incidence of enterococcal colonization/infectionFrom Day 0 to Day +100 post-transplantation, or until death or loss to follow-up, whichever came first
Incidence of bacteremiaFrom Day 0 to Day +100 post-transplantation, or until death or loss to follow-up, whichever came first
Incidence of upper gastrointestinal bleedingFrom Day 0 to Day +100 post-transplantation, or until death or loss to follow-up, whichever came first
Incidence of clinically significant reflux symptomsFrom Day 0 to Day +100 post-transplantation, or until death or loss to follow-up, whichever came first
1-year non-relapse mortality (NRM)From Day 0 to 1 year post-transplantation
1-year overall survival (OS)From Day 0 to 1 year post-transplantation
1-year GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS)From Day 0 to 1 year post-transplantation

Countries

China

Contacts

CONTACTFei Gao
gf0906@zju.edu.cn+86 19857035073

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 29, 2026