Skip to content

Population PK-guided ATG Dosing in Haplo-HSCT

Pharmacokinetic Guided ATG Targeted Dosing Strategy in Unmanipulated Haploidentical Haematopoietic Stem-cell Transplantation

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07791576
Enrollment
63
Registered
2026-08-28
Start date
2025-05-10
Completion date
2027-12-30
Last updated
2026-08-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Brief summary

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a population pharmacokinetics (PK)-guided targeted ATG dosing strategy in haploidentical stem cell transplantation and to observe the GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) in the cohort receiving this strategy.

Detailed description

Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) has demonstrated remarkable clinical efficacy in treating hematologic malignancies and has become the primary allogeneic transplantation modality in China. However, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains a critical complication that significantly reduces early survival and long-term quality of life (QoL). GVHD not only severely suppresses immune function but also presents challenges in treatment, including complexity, high costs, prolonged duration, and limited efficacy. Therefore, optimizing GVHD prevention strategies offers greater clinical value than expanding treatment options, as it effectively reduces acute and chronic GVHD incidence and improves overall survival (OS) and long-term QoL. Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG), a polyclonal immunosuppressant, is widely used in related haplo-HSCT. The conventional high-dose rabbit ATG (Thymoglobulin, 10 mg/kg) effectively promotes engraftment and prevents fatal GVHD but significantly increases the risk of severe viral infections (e.g., CMV, EBV) and may increase relapse rates due to excessive immunosuppression weakening the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect. Dose reduction studies have shown trade-offs: lowering ATG from 10 mg/kg to 6 mg/kg reduced infections but increased severe acute GVHD from 4.5% to 16.1%; a 7.5 mg/kg regimen lowered severe acute GVHD to 7.9% but with significantly higher viral reactivation. The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) better reflects ATG exposure than single pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. The investigators established an ATG-AUC assay and analyzed 106 haplo-HSCT patients receiving uniform 10 mg/kg ATG, revealing substantial inter-individual AUC variability. Some patients had ATG-AUC above or below the optimal exposure window. Modeling of over 1,000 concentration samples (2022) identified the optimal ATG-AUC range as 100-148.5 IU/day/mL. A targeted individualized dosing technique was developed (2023) and validated in a prospective single-arm trial (2024), showing that individualized dosing achieved more patients within or closer to the optimal AUC range compared to fixed dosing. This approach improved post-transplant CD4+ T-cell immune reconstitution, reduced viral reactivation risk without increasing GVHD, and improved long-term survival and QoL. The next step involves statistical modeling and clinical validation of clinical-biologic parameters (body weight, age, body surface area, lymphocyte count at infusion, graft T-cell count, HLA matching degree) with ATG-AUC from 94 patients to develop a predictive model for individualized ATG dosing. A prospective, single-arm clinical study will be conducted to validate the safety and efficacy of population PK-guided targeted ATG dosing in haplo-HSCT, including the optimal AUC attainment rate (100-148.5 IU/day/mL). Outcomes to be observed include GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS), viral reactivation rate, acute/chronic GVHD incidence, treatment-related mortality (TRM), disease-free survival (DFS), OS, and immune reconstitution. The goal is to establish the optimal ATG regimen for haplo-HSCT to improve survival and QoL.

Interventions

Population pharmacokinetic formula-guided targeted ATG dosing plus classical GVHD prophylaxis regimen

Sponsors

Chinese PLA General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
14 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with indications for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, with malignant hematologic diseases in CR1 or CR2 before transplantation. 2. Have an HLA-matched sibling, unrelated, or haploidentical donor. 3. Age ≥ 14 years and ≤ 65 years. 4. Liver function: ALT and AST ≤ 2.5 × upper limit of normal, bilirubin ≤ 2 × upper limit of normal. 5. Renal function: creatinine ≤ upper limit of normal. 6. No uncontrolled infection or severe mental or psychological disorders. 7. ECOG performance status score of 0-2. 8. Signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. No HLA-matched donor. 2. Malignant hematologic disease in CR3 or higher disease stage, or refractory/relapsed status,or second transplantation. 3. Patient age \< 14 years or \> 65 years. 4. Pregnancy of either the donor or the recipient. 5. Presence of mental illness or other conditions that preclude compliance with the protocol.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
1-year GVHD-free and relapse-free survival rate(1-year-GRFS)1 year after treatmentGRFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of grade III-IV acute GVHD, chronic GVHD requiring systemic immunosuppressive therapy, or death due to disease relapse, whichever occurs first. The cumulative incidence of GRFS will be estimated using the Fine-Gray competing risk model.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
+180 days CMV virus reactivation rate180 days post-transplant+180 days CMV virus reactivation rate refers to the time from randomization to CMV virus reactivation, relapse or death within 180 days post-transplant. The actual incidence rate is calculated as the number of patients with events / total number of cases × 100%.
Acute GVHD incidence100 days post-transplantAcute GVHD incidence refers to the time from randomization to acute GVHD onset, relapse or death within 100 days post-transplant. The actual incidence rate is calculated as the number of patients with events / total number of cases × 100%.
disease free survival (DFS)1 years after treatmentDisease free survival (DFS) refers to the time from treatment to the first lymphoma recurrence.
Cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR)1 years after treatmentCumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) refers to the number of patients with hematologic or MRD relapse from randomization to the last follow-up.
Cumulative non-relapse mortality (NRM)1 years after treatmentCumulative non-relapse mortality (NRM) refers to death due to non-relapse causes while in complete remission (CR), measured as the number of patients with NRM from randomization to the last follow-up.
PTLD cumulative incidence[Time Frame: 1 year after treatment]Treatment-related safety indicator: cumulative incidence of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) from randomization to the last follow-up.
+180 days EBV virus reactivation rate180 days post-transplantThe +180-day EBV virus reactivation rate refers to the time from randomization to EBV virus reactivation, relapse, or death within 180 days post-transplant. The actual incidence rate is calculated as the number of patients with events / total number of cases × 100%.
Chronic GVHD cumulative incidence[Time Frame: 1 year after treatment]Treatment-related safety indicator: cumulative incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (chronic GVHD) from randomization to the last follow-up.
Immune reconstitution status1 years after treatmentImmune reconstitution status refers to the actual incidence rate calculated as the number of patients with immune reconstitution / total number of cases × 100% from randomization to the last follow-up.
Overall Survival (OS)1 year after treatmentOverall survival (OS) refers to death from any cause from randomization to the last follow-up. The 1-year OS rate is estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, calculated as the proportion of patients alive at 1 year after treatment; patients lost to follow-up are censored at the date of last contact.

Countries

China

Contacts

CONTACTDai-Hong Liu, director
daihongrm@163.com86-010-66937232
STUDY_CHAIRDai-Hong Liu, director

Chinese PLA General Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 29, 2026