Skip to content

Postoperative Rehabilitation in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

The Effect of Postoperative Rehabilitation on Stabilometric Balance, Postural Control, and Plantar Pressure Distribution in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07791485
Enrollment
42
Registered
2026-08-28
Start date
2026-09-01
Completion date
2027-06-01
Last updated
2026-08-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rehabilitation, Scoliosis; Adolescence, Surgery

Keywords

adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, postoperative rehabilitation, scoliosis surgery

Brief summary

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a three-dimensional spinal deformity occurring in growing individuals. In cases with progressive curvature, posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation (PSF) is considered the gold-standard surgical treatment for correcting the deformity and stabilizing the spine. Although surgery provides correction of the deformity, the loss of motion in the fused spinal segments may alter trunk biomechanics, potentially affecting postural control, balance mechanisms, and plantar pressure distribution. Although several studies have investigated balance and postural control parameters in individuals with AIS, no study has been identified that objectively examines the effects of postoperative rehabilitation programs on stabilometric balance, postural control, and plantar pressure distribution following PSF surgery. This study aims to investigate the effects of an exercise-based rehabilitation program on stabilometric balance, postural control, and plantar pressure distribution in individuals with AIS who have undergone PSF surgery. This randomized controlled trial is planned to include at least 42 individuals with AIS who have undergone PSF surgery and are being followed by the Department of Neurosurgery at Marmara University. Participants will be randomly assigned to an intervention group or a control group. The intervention group will participate in an exercise-based rehabilitation program consisting of two sessions per week for eight weeks. Consistent with routine practice, the control group will not participate in a structured rehabilitation program. Postural control, stabilometric balance, and plantar pressure distribution will be assessed using a stabilometric and baropodometric platform system. Assessments will be conducted before and after the rehabilitation period. The findings are expected to contribute to the scientific evidence regarding postoperative rehabilitation approaches. The results may also guide clinicians in planning exercise-based rehabilitation programs following scoliosis surgery and provide patients and their families with useful information regarding the postoperative recovery process.

Detailed description

Scoliosis is a complex three-dimensional deformity characterized by a lateral deviation of the spine of at least 10 degrees in the coronal plane (Choudhry et al., 2016). Idiopathic scoliosis is a structural form of scoliosis for which no specific etiology has been identified. When it develops between the onset of puberty and the closure of the growth plates, it is classified as adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) (Winter, 1994; Weinstein et al., 2008). Current treatment options for scoliosis include observation, bracing, and surgical intervention. Selection of the most appropriate treatment approach depends on factors such as the patient's age, menarcheal status, curve location and magnitude, and risk of progression (Zhang et al., 2020). Although skeletally immature children with curves reaching 40-50 degrees are generally considered candidates for surgical treatment, other factors-including curve pattern, rate of progression, the presence of additional deformities, and failure to respond to conservative treatment-may also influence the decision to perform surgery (Bridwell, 1999; Kim et al., 2009; Pourfeizi et al., 2014). Among the various surgical procedures used to treat scoliosis, posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation (PSF) is the most commonly used approach and is regarded as the gold-standard surgical technique in the literature (Lonner et al., 2007). This technique eliminates motion in the involved spinal segments by creating a fusion to correct the deformity, achieve a balanced spine, and prevent further curve progression (Upasani et al., 2015). Alterations in balance control, postural stability, and postural sway parameters have been reported in individuals with AIS due to the three-dimensional spinal deformity. Impairments in sensorimotor integration mechanisms involving the trunk and changes in plantar pressure distribution have also been reported (Beaulieu et al., 2009; Sahli et al., 2013; Karimi et al., 2016; Dufvenberg et al., 2018). Following surgical correction, the elimination of motion in certain spinal segments may increase loading on the remaining mobile segments, leading to changes in trunk biomechanics and new adaptations in postural control mechanisms. However, the limited evidence regarding the effects of these changes and adaptations in individuals with scoliosis remains inconsistent. Previous studies have reported postoperative reductions in spinal flexibility and mobility, as well as chronic pain (Danielsson et al., 2001; Engsberg et al., 2003; Maruyama et al., 2008), decreased trunk muscle endurance (Danielsson et al., 2006), adverse effects on balance- and postural control-related parameters, or a lack of improvement in these parameters following surgery (McCance et al., 1998; de Santiago et al., 2013; Osuka et al., 2023). Studies addressing the postoperative period have suggested that physiotherapist-supervised rehabilitation programs may be important for preventing secondary spinal problems and supporting postoperative recovery (Weiss, 2002; Laurentowska et al., 2009; Bazancir et al., 2023; Çetinkaya et al., 2025). Nevertheless, only a limited number of studies have investigated postoperative rehabilitation in individuals with AIS. Laurentowska et al. reported that a four-week endurance-based rehabilitation program initiated one to three years after surgery significantly improved exercise capacity and emphasized that rehabilitation should continue after spinal fusion in individuals with scoliosis (Laurentowska et al., 2009). Weiss demonstrated that a pain-management-based inpatient rehabilitation program could reduce chronic pain in patients who had undergone surgery at least 10 years earlier (Weiss, 2002). Short-term inpatient rehabilitation programs implemented after scoliosis surgery have also been reported to support postoperative recovery and improve quality of life (Bazancir et al., 2023). In addition, a physiotherapist-supervised telerehabilitation program initiated from the sixth postoperative month was reported to improve trunk endurance and flexibility and positively affect quality of life (Çetinkaya et al., 2025). Although these studies have addressed postoperative rehabilitation approaches, there remains a notable lack of research examining the effects of rehabilitation on biomechanical variables such as postural control mechanisms, stabilometric balance parameters, and plantar pressure distribution following surgery. Changes in postural control and balance mechanisms may affect individuals' activities of daily living and their participation in social and physical activities. Participation in physical activity and social life is particularly important during adolescence because of its contribution to overall health and quality of life. Therefore, it is important to investigate postoperative rehabilitation approaches aimed at supporting functional capacity and facilitating the reorganization of postural control mechanisms. Further research is also needed to establish evidence-based rehabilitation programs that support the biomechanical adaptation of the fused spine and the postoperative recovery process. Accordingly, this study aims to investigate the effects of an exercise-based postoperative rehabilitation program on stabilometric balance, postural control, and static plantar pressure distribution in individuals who have undergone PSF surgery for AIS, using objective biomechanical assessment methods. The findings are expected to contribute to the development of postoperative rehabilitation approaches and to support individuals' functional independence and quality of life. The results are also expected to provide evidence regarding the effectiveness of the exercise program and to offer guidance for clinicians working in this field, as well as for patients and their families.

Interventions

Participants in the experimental group will receive a supervised exercise-based rehabilitation program consisting of 16 sessions delivered twice weekly for eight weeks. Each session will last approximately 60 minutes and will be supervised by a physiotherapist. The program will focus on core muscle control, spinal mobility, and dynamic stabilization and will begin with face-to-face patient education. Exercise equipment will be provided by the researchers, and a five-minute rest period will be allowed when requested. On days without supervised sessions, participants will perform the prescribed exercises at home for approximately 20 minutes and record their adherence in an exercise diary, which will be reviewed during the supervised sessions.

Sponsors

Marmara University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Double

Intervention model description

Randomized Controlled Trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
10 Years to 20 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged 10 years or older * Diagnosed with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis * Having undergone posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation between 6 months and 3 years before enrollment

Exclusion criteria

* Having undergone anterior spinal fusion and instrumentation, combined anteroposterior spinal fusion and instrumentation, thoracoscopic vertebral body tethering, or vertebral body stapling * A history of previous spinal surgery other than the current posterior spinal fusion procedure * The presence of a severe neuromuscular, rheumatological, or orthopedic condition accompanying scoliosis * The presence of a congenital deformity, such as leg-length discrepancy, limb agenesis, or limb hypoplasia * Current participation in another physiotherapist-supervised rehabilitation program * Inadequate biological healing based on radiographic assessment or being considered unsuitable for participation by the treating physician * Inability to perform the assessments or interventions required by the study or inability to cooperate with study procedures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Center of Pressure SwayBaseline and immediately after the 8-week interventionCenter of pressure (CoP) sway during quiet standing will be assessed using the FreeMed® stabilometric platform and FreeStep® software. Participants will stand barefoot with their feet shoulder-width apart, arms relaxed at their sides, and eyes focused on a fixed point during a 25-second recording. Three measurements will be performed, and the mean value will be used for analysis. Lower values indicate less postural sway.
Change in Center of Pressure Sway VelocityBaseline and immediately after the 8-week interventionCenter of pressure sway velocity during quiet standing will be assessed using the FreeMed® stabilometric platform and FreeStep® software during a 25-second recording. Three measurements will be performed under the same standardized conditions, and the mean value will be used for analysis. Lower values indicate slower postural sway and better postural stability.
Change in Center of Pressure Stability Ellipse AreaBaseline and immediately after the 8-week interventionThe stability ellipse area of the center of pressure trajectory during quiet standing will be assessed using the FreeMed® stabilometric platform and FreeStep® software during a 25-second recording. Three measurements will be performed, and the mean value will be used for analysis. A smaller ellipse area indicates less postural sway.
Change in Directional Center of Pressure SwayBaseline and immediately after the 8-week interventionAnteroposterior and mediolateral center of pressure sway during quiet standing will be assessed using the FreeMed® stabilometric platform and FreeStep® software during a 25-second recording. Anteroposterior and mediolateral sway will be recorded as separate parameters. Three measurements will be performed, and the mean values will be used for analysis. Lower values indicate less directional postural sway.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Static Plantar Load DistributionBaseline and immediately after the 8-week interventionStatic plantar load distribution during quiet standing will be assessed using the FreeMed® baropodometric platform and FreeStep® software. The percentages of load distributed between the right and left feet, forefoot and rearfoot, and medial and lateral plantar regions will be recorded. Three measurements will be performed, and the mean values will be used for analysis. Values closer to an even distribution indicate greater load symmetry.
Change in Plantar Contact AreaBaseline and immediately after the 8-week interventionThe plantar contact area of the right and left feet during quiet standing will be assessed using the FreeMed® baropodometric platform and FreeStep® software. Contact area will be recorded separately for each foot. Three measurements will be performed, and the mean values will be used for analysis.
Change in Postural AlignmentBaseline and immediately after the 8-week interventionPostural alignment will be assessed using the video analysis system integrated with the FreeMed® platform. Trunk inclination, pelvic tilt, and shoulder tilt will be recorded as separate postural alignment parameters. Three measurements will be performed using the same standardized protocol, and the mean values will be used for analysis. Values closer to neutral alignment indicate less postural asymmetry.

Contacts

CONTACTİrem Çetinkaya, PhD
iremkaranki@gmail.com5548056805
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORİrem Çetinkaya, PhD

Marmara University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 29, 2026