Skip to content

International Multicenter Outcomes of Transcatheter Pulmonary Flow Restrictors in Congenital and Acquired Heart Disease

RESTRICT : International Multicenter Outcomes of Transcatheter Pulmonary Flow Restrictors in Congenital and Acquired Heart Disease

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07791069
Acronym
RESTRICT
Enrollment
150
Registered
2026-08-27
Start date
2026-10-01
Completion date
2030-01-01
Last updated
2026-09-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Congenital Heart Disease

Keywords

Pulmonary flow restriction, microvascular plug, pulmonary artery banding, staged palliation, single-ventricle physiology

Brief summary

The international multicenter registry aims to collect real-world data on clinical outcomes and evaluate the net clinical success of transcatheter microvascular plug (MVP)-based pulmonary flow restrictors (PFRs) in patients with congenital and acquired heart disease.

Detailed description

This is a multicenter, international, non-randomized, non-interventional, observational post-marketing clinical follow-up study with retrospective and prospective data collection, designed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of off-label implantation of microvascular plug (MVP)-based pulmonary flow restrictors (PFRs) in patients with congenital and acquired heart disease.

Interventions

DEVICETranscatheter pulmonary flow restriction

Transcatheter implantation of a microvascular plug (MVP)-based pulmonary flow restrictor (PFR) in a single or bilateral pulmonary artery (PA) branch(es).

Sponsors

Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 3 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Pediatric patients (≤3 years) with any congenital or acquired heart disease, regardless of gender, ethnicity, or geographic location, who underwent transcatheter insertion of the MVP-based PFR device in single or bilateral PA branches between January 2019 and January 2028. * Informed consent obtained from parents or legal guardians.

Exclusion criteria

* Study device implanted in other locations: modified BT shunt, arterial duct, stented arterial duct, Sano conduit, and central shunt.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Net clinical successFrom date of device implant until the date of surgical device removal, assessed up to 24 monthsComposite non-hierarchical net clinical success, evaluated at the time of surgical PFR removal (either as a standalone procedure or during target surgery), and defined by meeting the following three criteria: 1) technical success (successful implantation and retention\* of the MVP device in each branch PA), 2) clinical success (evidence of PBF restriction\*\* at PFR removal), and 3) safety success (no major adverse device-related events (MADREs).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Technical implantation successFrom date of device implant until hospital discharge, assessed up to 6 weeksTechnical success of PFR implantation (device successfully delivered, deployed, and retained in each branch PA) at hospital discharge after the index procedure.
Immediate flow restriction successFrom device implant to procedure conclusionImmediate flow restriction success of MVP-based PFRs, defined as technical success and evidence of pulmonary blood flow (BPF) restriction, at procedure conclusion (Evidence of PBF restriction at procedure conclusion was defined as a minimal drop in oxygen saturation on arterial blood gas by 10% at the same level of FiO2 compared to preoperative levels, a systolic-diastolic Doppler-pattern across the PFRs with a minimum peak Doppler gradient of 40 mmHg (Vmax=3.2 m/s) on per-procedural ultrasound assessment, and, when performed, a reduction in the baseline QP/QS mismatch by 50%).
Safety successFrom date of device implant until the date of surgical device removal, assessed up to 24 monthsSafety success (freedom from MADREs\*, vascular-, or procedure-related SAEs\*\*) at the time of device removal. The severity of MADRE and SAE will be classified using a validated 1-to-5 scale, ranging from none to catastrophic. \*MADREs include device-related vascular erosion, vascular aneurysm/pseudoaneurysm, bronchial compression, device collapse, migration, embolization, thrombosis, fracture, infection, endocarditis, resulting in unplanned or anticipated device removal, or redo-intervention (surgical or catheter-based) \*\*SAEs encompassed device- vascular- or procedure-related adverse events resulting in death, life-threatening situations, hospitalization, disability, or major surgical intervention.
All cause mortalityFrom date of device implant until the date of surgical device removal, assessed up to 24 monthsAll-cause mortality rate at the time of device removal.

Countries

France, Germany, Serbia, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORRaymond N. Haddad, MD, MHSc, PhDc

Marie Lannelongue Hospital, INSERM, UMR-S1358, UP-Saclay

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 16, 2026