Skip to content

Quality of Vision After Implantation of EDOF Implants Versus Monofocal Implants in Patients Who Underwent Epiretinal Membrane and Cataract Surgery

A Prospective, Randomized Study Evaluating the Quality of Vision After Implantation of EDOF Implants Versus Monofocal Implants in Patients Who Underwent Epiretinal Membrane and Cataract Surgery

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07789249
Acronym
MACAEDOF
Enrollment
100
Registered
2026-08-27
Start date
2026-09-20
Completion date
2028-12-20
Last updated
2026-08-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Extended Depth of Focus, Intraocular Implants

Brief summary

Phacoexistence, the first surgical procedure performed in France, naturally raises the question of lens replacement. In recent years, the choice of intraocular lenses has expanded considerably. The term EDOF (Extended Depth of Focus) refers to intraocular lenses offering an extended depth of field to improve vision at different distances, while reducing the visual aberrations associated with traditional multifocal lenses. However, they still generate some optical aberrations that could therefore limit the quality of vision for patients with retinal damage. With the development and acceleration of cataractogenic processes observed after vitrectomy, the use of combined phaco-vitrectomy surgery has become increasingly common, particularly among patients over 60 years of age. This integrated approach allows for the simultaneous treatment of cataracts and vitreoretinal pathologies, thus reducing the need for subsequent cataract surgery, which frequently develops after vitrectomy. In addition to optimizing the patient care pathway, this technique offers clinical advantages, such as faster visual recovery and fewer complications associated with multiple surgeries. Phacovitrectomy is therefore emerging as a practical and effective solution for managing elderly patients requiring vitreoretinal surgery. Therefore, in the specific context of macular surgery, often considered less suitable for the use of premium implants, EDOF (Extended Depth of Focus) implants raise some questions. The available data on their performance and tolerability in this specific context remain limited, making their use still poorly defined in these complex clinical situations, except in certain medical macular pathologies.\<sup\>4\</sup\> This study aims to evaluate, within the context of macular surgery, the relevance and potential role of EDOF (Extended Depth of Focus) implants in order to improve the management of these patients.

Interventions

OTHERQuestionnaires

NEI-VFQ (National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire) 25 before the surgery, 3 months after and 6 months after the surgery.

OTHERIntermediate visual acuity

ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) scale before the surgery and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the surgery

PROCEDUREOptical coherence tomography

1 month, 3 months and 6 months after surgery

PROCEDUREcataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation

Two different cataract surgeries : TECNIS monofocal versus PureSee EDOF (extended depth of focus)

Sponsors

Almaviva Sante
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female over 18 years of age * Epiretinal membrane with surgical indication * Indication for cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation * Epiretinal membranes with near visual acuity ≥ P4 * Preserved ellipsoidal zone in the retrofoveal region, without fragmentation or interruption * Central macular thickness less than or equal to 450 microns * Signed informed consent * Patients covered by social security or an equivalent scheme

Exclusion criteria

* Associated ocular pathologies (advanced glaucoma, exudative AMD). * Central macular thickness \> 450 microns * Epiretinal membranes with near visual acuity \< P4 * Previous macular surgery * Contraindication to the implantation of either type of lens * Cognitive impairment, or a disorder causing difficulty understanding instructions or answering questionnaires * Pregnant, parturient, or breastfeeding women, as defined in Article L1121-5 of the French Public Health Code (CSP) * Protected individuals: adults under guardianship, curatorship, or other legal protection, deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision. * Patients incapable of personally giving consent, as defined in Article L.1121-8 of the French Public Health Code (CSP), or adults protected by law

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Distance visual acuity (4 m)3 monthsDistance visual acuity (4 m) using the ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) scale at 3 months. This involves asking the patient, positioned 4 meters away, to read a chart made up of 5 letters per line, with the size gradually decreasing from top to bottom. The score is determined by counting the number of letters read correctly (each letter is worth 1 point). The maximum score is 100 to 110 letters depending on the version.

Countries

France

Contacts

CONTACTJessica Delorme
jessica.delorme@almaviva-sante.com00336 23 91 95 73

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 28, 2026