Skip to content

The ALIVE-Project: Activity, Life Satisfaction, Inclusion, Vitality, Elderly Women

The ALIVE-Project: Activity, Life Satisfaction, Inclusion, Vitality, Elderly Women

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07789080
Acronym
ALIVE
Enrollment
213
Registered
2026-08-27
Start date
2026-08-01
Completion date
2027-07-01
Last updated
2026-08-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Loneliness, Social Isolation in Older Adults, Physical Inactivity, Healthy Ageing

Keywords

Loneliness, Healthy Ageing, Socal isolation, Older adults

Brief summary

Many older women live alone and may experience loneliness, reduced social participation, and declining physical health. Regular physical activity can improve health and independence, but it is not known whether exercising in a supervised group setting provides additional social and psychological benefits compared with exercising independently. The ALIVE study is a 16-week randomized controlled trial that will investigate the effects of fitness club participation on loneliness, social connectedness, quality of life, mental health, physical activity, and physical fitness in women aged 75 years and older who live alone and are insufficiently physically active. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: (1) supervised group exercise at a fitness club combined with opportunities for social interaction, (2) fitness club membership with independent exercise, or (3) a control group continuing their usual daily activities. A total of 213 women will be recruited from Oslo, Norway. Outcomes will be assessed before and after the intervention using questionnaires, physical performance tests, body composition measurements, cardiovascular risk assessments, and device-based measurement of physical activity. In addition, qualitative interviews will be conducted to explore participants' experiences, barriers, facilitators, and perceptions of social connection and belonging. The study aims to determine whether supervised group exercise in fitness clubs can reduce loneliness and improve health and well-being among older women, while generating knowledge about practical community-based strategies to support healthy and socially connected ageing.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSupervised Group Exercise in Fitness Clubs

Participants assigned to this intervention will receive a 16-week supervised group exercise program delivered in fitness clubs. Exercise sessions will be conducted twice weekly in stable groups of approximately 8 to 15 participants and led by trained health and exercise professionals. Each 60-minute session includes warm-up, aerobic and resistance exercises, functional circuit training, balance exercises, and cool-down. Participants will also have opportunities for informal social interaction with fellow participants following each session. The intervention is designed to combine regular physical activity with structured social participation in order to promote social connectedness, well-being, and physical health in older women.

Participants will receive a 16-week membership to a different SATS fitness club in the same district, which includes access to advanced cardio and resistance equipment, but without the group-based exercises. They will be given one supervised session to learn how to use the equipment. This group represents access to a community exercise arena without structured social facilitation through group-based exercise classes, thereby allowing examination of whether access alone is sufficient, or whether structured social participation is necessary for improved mental and physical health. Importantly, this comparison enables evaluation of the added value of structured social participation beyond access to exercise facilities alone. It also allows us to explore whether simply leaving the home environment and being exposed to a social setting may in itself contribute to improved quality of life.

Sponsors

Norwegian School of Sport Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER
SATS
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Oslo University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Intervention model description

Participants will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of three parallel groups: (1) supervised group exercise plus fitness club membership, (2) fitness club membership with independent exercise, or (3) a usual-life control group. The study is designed to compare the effects of structured group-based exercise and social participation with fitness club access alone and with no intervention.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
75 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Women aged ≥75 years * Currently living alone for at least four months (including widowed or single women) * Residing at home in Oslo with convenient access to participating SATS fitness clubs in the Nordre Aker or Vestre Aker districts * Participating in \<60 minutes per week of planned, structured exercise at moderate-to-vigorous intensity, whether individually or in an organized setting (excluding recreational walking and other habitual physical activity)

Exclusion criteria

* Dementia or other cognitive impairment * Diseases that are contraindicated for exercise or testing (such as unstable angina, recent heart attack, uncontrolled arrhythmia, or recent coronary bypass surgery)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Loneliness and socal isolationBaseline and immediately after the 16-week interventionThe Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale-6 (RULS-6) will be used to assess subjective feelings of loneliness and social isolation. The instrument consists of 6 items evaluated on a 4-point Likert scale. Individual item scores are summed to produce a single total score.The scale has a minimum value of 6 and a maximum value of 24. A higher total score on the RULS-6 indicates a worse outcome, representing a higher degree of perceived loneliness and social alienation. Conversely, lower scores represent a better outcome (greater social connectedness).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Depression and anxietyBaseline and immediately after the 16-week interventionThe Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) assesses symptoms of anxiety and depression using two separate 7-item subscales (HADS-A and HADS-D). Each subscale has a minimum value of 0 and a maximum value of 21. A higher score indicates a worse outcome (greater severity of anxiety or depressive symptoms).
Functional independenceBaseline and immediately after the 16-week interventionThe Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (IADL) assesses an individual's ability to perform complex daily tasks necessary for independent community living. The instrument evaluates eight distinct functional domains. The scale has a minimum value of 0 and a maximum value of 8. A higher score indicates a better outcome, representing a higher level of functional independence and autonomy.
Health-related quality of lifeBaseline and immediately after the 16-week interventionThe Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) assesses health-related quality of life. The items are scored and transformed into standardized domain scores. Each scale has a minimum value of 0 and a maximum value of 100. A higher score indicates a better outcome (better health and higher quality of life)
Urinary incontinenceBaseline and immediately after the 16-week interventionThe International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI-SF) assesses the frequency, severity, and impact of urinary incontinence on daily life. The instrument utilizes three scored items to calculate a total additive score, alongside one unscored self-diagnostic item. The scale has a minimum value of 0 and a maximum value of 21. A higher score indicates a worse outcome, representing greater symptom severity and a higher negative impact on quality of life.
EnduranceBaseline and immediately after the 16-week interventionThe 6-Minute Walk Test evaluates functional exercise capacity and aerobic endurance. The test measures the total distance a participant can walk in a period of 6 minutes, with the outcome recorded in meters. A higher score indicates a better outcome (higher physical endurance and better functional mobility).
Lower-body muscle strength and functional mobilityBaseline and immediately after the 16-week interventionThe 30-Second Chair Stand Test evaluates lower-body muscle strength and functional mobility. The test measures the total number of times a participant can stand up completely from a seated position in a period of 30 seconds without using their arms. A higher score indicates a better outcome.
Hand grip strengthBaseline and immediately after the 16-week interventionThe Hand Grip Strength Test evaluates isometric muscular strength of the hand and forearm using a hand-held dynamometer. The test measures the maximum squeezing force exerted by the participant, with the outcome recorded in kilograms (kg). A higher score indicates a better outcome.
Balance and postural stabilitBaseline and immediately after the 16-week interventionThe One-Leg Standing Test evaluates static balance and postural stability. The test measures the total duration a participant can maintain balance standing on a single leg, with the outcome recorded in seconds. A higher score indicates a better outcome (superior static balance and lower fall risk).
Body compositionBaseline and immediately after the 16-week interventionBody Composition analysis using the InBody 770 evaluates body composition metrics (including skeletal muscle mass and body fat mass) via multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis. Raw metrics are recorded in kilograms (kg) or percentages (%). For skeletal muscle mass, a higher score indicates a better outcome (greater muscle reserve), while for body fat mass, extreme scores in either direction indicate a worse outcome (clinical underweight or obesity).
Metabolic biomarkersBaseline and immediately after the 16-week interventionFinger prick tests for glucose, cholesterol, and triglycerides evaluate metabolic biomarkers using a capillary blood sample. Metrics are recorded in millimoles per liter (mmol/L). For glucose, total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, and triglycerides, elevated levels indicate a worse outcome (metabolic risk). Conversely, for high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, a higher score indicates a better outcome (cardiovascular protection).
Musculoskeletal complaintsBaseline and immediately after the 16-week interventionSelected items from the Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT4) will be used for descriptive purposes to map chronic pain. The screening item registers the presence or absence of chronic pain. The subsequent 13 anatomical pain sites are formatted as checkboxes to register whether a complaint is present.
Device-measured physical activityBaseline and immediately after the 16-week interventionDevice-measured physical activity using accelerometers evaluates movement patterns through continuous objective monitoring for seven days. Outcomes are recorded as raw acceleration counts, which are used to calculate time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in minutes. A higher score indicates a better outcome (higher physical fitness and physical activity level).

Countries

Norway

Contacts

CONTACTEmilie Dalhaug
emiliefm@nih.no+ 47 91708426

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 28, 2026