Skip to content

Advanced Airway Management Among Primary Care Health

Educational Needs in Advanced Airway Management Among Primary Care Health Professionals: a Cross-sectional Study on Knowledge, Self-perceived Competence, and Training Needs.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07788690
Acronym
MMC26
Enrollment
538
Registered
2026-08-26
Start date
2024-09-01
Completion date
2025-11-30
Last updated
2026-09-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Enhance Patient Safety, Nurse Physician Relations, Physician-Nurse Relations

Keywords

Primary Health Care, Health Education, Supraglottic Airway Devices, Simulation, Airway Management

Brief summary

Background: Advanced airway management is a critical component of advanced life support (ALS). Supraglottic airway devices (SADs) represent an effective and safe alternative to endotracheal intubation in emergency settings, particularly in Primary Care (PC), where low exposure to critical situations favors skills decay. The objective is to analyze the baseline level of theoretical knowledge and self-perceived ability regarding SADs management among PC physicians and nurses. Methods This quantitative cross-sectional study was conducted in primary care (PC) health centers within the Castellón Health Department, Spain. The study included 92 PC healthcare professionals. Data were collected using an ad hoc digital questionnaire that had previously been validated by 14 experts, achieving an overall Scale-level Content Validity Index (S-CVI) of 0.93. Descriptive and bivariate inferential analyses were performed using Pearson's chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, and the Mann-Whitney U test. Statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05.

Detailed description

BACKGROUND Out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA) is one of the leading medical emergencies worldwide, with an incidence in Europe of approximately 55 cases per 100,000 inhabitants and an overall survival rate at hospital discharge of close to 8%. In Spain, the estimated incidence is around 25 cases per 100,000 inhabitants, with survival rates that remain moderate and are influenced by delays in the initiation of resuscitation and by the quality of initial advanced life support. During Advanced Life Support (ALS), rapid and effective airway management is a critical factor in mitigating hypoxic brain injury. Although endotracheal intubation (ETI) has traditionally been considered the gold standard, its performance in out-of-hospital settings by non-anesthesiologists or practitioners with limited technical experience is associated with significant rates of failure, repeated attempts, and prolonged interruptions in chest compressions, which severely compromise coronary and cerebral perfusion. In this scenario, supraglottic devices (SGDs) have emerged as a priority first-line alternative that is safe and quick to insert, offering high success rates and minimizing pauses in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Current recommendations prioritize techniques that ensure effective ventilation while minimizing interruptions in chest compressions. However, evidence indicates that a significant proportion of healthcare professionals have cognitive and competency deficits in the management of acute care. This situation is particularly relevant in primary care, where acute events are infrequent and opportunities for practical training are limited, which accelerates the phenomenon of skill decay. Assessing baseline knowledge is a fundamental step in identifying actual training needs and designing tailored educational interventions. However, there is little evidence regarding the cognitive level of primary care professionals with respect to the management of DSG prior to receiving structured training-a key starting point for guiding competency-based programs and ensuring patient safety. For all these reasons, the primary objective of this study was to assess the baseline level of theoretical knowledge regarding the management of DSG among primary care healthcare professionals (physicians and nurses) in the Castellón Department of Health. The following were set as secondary objectives: 1. Describe the sociodemographic, academic, and employment profiles of the staff being evaluated. 2. Identify specific conceptual gaps and common errors in ALS procedures related to the use of DSG. 3. Analyze the statistical association between sociodemographic and professional variables and the success rate on the knowledge questionnaire. 4. Assess professionals' self-perceived competence and compare it with their objective cognitive/theoretical performance.

Interventions

This is an educational intervention in which participants were provided with several sessions to recognize and better manage supraglottic devices.

Sponsors

Universitat Jaume I
Lead SponsorOTHER
Universitat Jaume I, Spain
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Generalitat Valenciana
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

An observational, analytical, and cross-sectional study was conducted at primary care health centers under the Castellón Department of Health (Valencian Community, Spain). The target population consisted of 538 active healthcare professionals (family physicians and community nurses). The sample size was calculated using the G\*Power program (v. 3.1.9.7), which determined a minimum requirement of 96 participants to ensure 95% statistical power (α=0.05; moderate-to-low effect size d=0.30). The final sample consisted of 92 participants who validly completed the questionnaire, maintaining a statistical power of over 90%. Selection was based on non-probabilistic convenience sampling. The medical and nursing coordinators at each health center were contacted to distribute the digital questionnaires to the professionals. Professionals who met the inclusion criteria and voluntarily provided their consent to participate were included in the study.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
22 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Physicians and nurses with active employment contracts in primary care in the evaluated department. 2. An employment contract or appointment lasting more than 6 months. 3. Voluntary consent to participate

Exclusion criteria

1. Doctors and nurses who were on temporary disability leave or leave of absence at the time of the study. 2. Questionnaires that were duplicates or had any blank questions.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline level of theoretical knowledge regarding the management of DSGFrom the enrollment to the end of first objective 6 weeksChange from baseline level of theoretical knowledge regarding the management of DSG among primary care healthcare professionals (physicians and nurses) in the Castellón Department of Health.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sociodemographic characteristicsFrom the enrollment to the end of the intervention, 4 weeksDescribe the sociodemographic profile of the staff being evaluated.
gaps and common errors in ALS proceduresFrom the enrollment to the end of the intervention 4 weeksIdentify specific conceptual gaps and common errors in ALS procedures related to the use of DSG.
statistical association between sociodemographic and professional variablesFrom the enrollment to the end of the intervention, 8 weeksAnalyze the statistical association between sociodemographic and professional variables and the success rate on the knowledge questionnaire.
ComparativeFrom the enrollment to the end of the intervention, 8 weeksAssess professionals' self-perceived competence and compare it with their objective cognitive/theoretical performance.

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 5, 2026