Skip to content

Effect of Adapted Physical Activity on Emotion Regulation in People With Depressive Disorders

Impact d'un Programme d'activité Physique adaptée Sur la régulation Des émotions de Personnes Souffrant de Troubles dépressifs, en Sortie d'Hospitalisation : étude REAPAD

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07780695
Acronym
REAPAD
Enrollment
45
Registered
2026-08-21
Start date
2023-02-10
Completion date
2026-04-30
Last updated
2026-08-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Depressive Disorder

Brief summary

Depression is associated with difficulties in emotion regulation. Adapted physical activity (APA) may help improve emotional regulation in people with depressive disorders. The REAPAD study evaluates the effects of an adapted physical activity program on emotion regulation in adults with depressive disorders following psychiatric hospitalization. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two APA programs: a standard adapted physical activity program or a combined adapted physical activity program including activities specifically targeting emotional regulation. Emotion regulation is assessed using the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ). The study also evaluates depressive symptoms, anxiety, self-esteem, physical activity, physical condition, and other psychological and physical outcomes.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALClassical Adapted Physical Activity Program

Participants received an individualized, moderate-intensity adapted physical activity program consisting of 8 sessions over 6 weeks, with at least one session per week. The program included aerobic training (step-based exercises, lateral stepping and locomotor circuit tasks), lower-limb resistance training (chair stands, step-ups, lateral stepping and lunges), and agility and coordination exercises (agility ladder drills and motor circuit tasks). Session duration progressively increased from 25 minutes for sessions 1 and 8 to 30, 35 and 40 minutes for the intermediate sessions. Each session included a 5-minute warm-up and muscular flexibility period and a 10-minute cool-down period.

Participants received an individualized, moderate-intensity adapted physical activity program consisting of 8 sessions over 6 weeks, with at least one session per week. The program included aerobic training, lower-limb resistance training, and agility and coordination exercises. In addition, cognitive and emotional training tasks were integrated into the physical activity sessions. Cognitive tasks included short-term memory activities, verbal fluency dual tasks and cognitive flexibility exercises. Emotional tasks included identifying, recognizing and expressing emotions using images and photographs of facial expressions. These cognitive and emotional tasks were incorporated during exercises and rest periods throughout the program.

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Georges Mazurelle
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age over 18 years * Unipolar or bipolar depressive disorder * Discharged from full hospitalization, up to three weeks after discharge * Able to provide free and informed consent * Not participating in any other research

Exclusion criteria

* High suicidal risk, at the investigator's discretion * Medical contraindication to any physical activity * Motor, psychological, or intellectual disability, or other medical condition, at the investigator's discretion, preventing full participation in the study * Severe addictive disorder impeding participation in the study * Psychotic disorder * Pregnancy or breastfeeding * Any circumstances rendering the participant unable to understand the nature, purpose, or consequences of the trial * Under legal protection (guardianship or trusteeship) * No social security coverage

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in emotion regulation strategies assessed by the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQBaseline (T0), immediately after completion of the 6-week intervention (T1), and 6 weeks after the end of the intervention (T2)Emotion regulation strategies are assessed using the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ), a 36-item self-administered questionnaire comprising nine subscales. Items are rated from 1 (almost never) to 5 (almost always), providing scores for adaptive and maladaptive cognitive emotion regulation strategies

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Depressive Symptom Severity Assessed by the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRSBaseline (T0), immediately after completion of the 6-week intervention (T1), and 6 weeks after the end of the intervention (T2)Depressive symptom severity is assessed using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). The scale consists of 10 items assessing depressive symptoms, each rated from 0 to 6. The total score ranges from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater severity of depressive symptoms.
Change in Cognitive Flexibility Assessed by the Trail Making Test (TMT)Baseline (T0), immediately after completion of the 6-week intervention (T1), and 6 weeks after the end of the intervention (T2)Cognitive functioning is assessed using the Trail Making Test (TMT). The test includes Part A and Part B. Performance is assessed using the time required to complete each part, with longer completion times indicating poorer performance.
Change in Subjective Vitality Assessed by the Subjective Vitality ScaleBaseline (T0), immediately after completion of the 6-week intervention (T1), and 6 weeks after the end of the intervention (T2)Subjective vitality is assessed using the Subjective Vitality Scale. The scale consists of 5 items rated from 1 to 7 and assesses the participant's subjective experience of physical and psychological energy and vitality. Higher scores indicate greater subjective vitality
Change in Mood States Assessed by the Profile of Mood States (POMS-F)Immediately before and immediately after each adapted physical activity sessionMood states are assessed using the French version of the Profile of Mood States (POMS-F), a 65-item self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire assesses seven transient and fluctuating mood dimensions: tension-anxiety, anger-hostility, confusion-bewilderment, depression-dejection, fatigue-inertia, vigor-activity, and interpersonal relations. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale. An overall psychological distress score is calculated by summing the tension-anxiety, anger-hostility, confusion-bewilderment, depression-dejection, and fatigue-inertia scores and subtracting the vigor-activity score. Higher psychological distress scores indicate greater mood disturbance. Mood state is assessed using the French version of the Profile of Mood States (POMS-F). The POMS-F consists of 65 items rated from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). The Global Score is calculated as the sum of Anxiety-Tension, Anger-Hostility, Confusion-Bewilderment, Depression-Dejection, and Fatigue-Inertia scores

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 25, 2026