Skip to content

Case-Based Collaborative Learning for Arrhythmia Recognition in Novice Intensive Care Nurses

Effect of Case-Based Collaborative Learning on Arrhythmia Recognition and Patient Safety Attitudes Among Novice Intensive Care Nurses: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07780448
Enrollment
72
Registered
2026-08-21
Start date
2026-08-01
Completion date
2026-12-01
Last updated
2026-08-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arrhythmia, Arrhythmia Recognition, Patient Safety Attitudes

Keywords

Case-Based Collaborative Learning, Arrhythmia Recognition, Electrocardiography, Patient Safety, Intensive Care Nursing, Novice Nurses, Nursing Education

Brief summary

This randomized controlled trial evaluates the effectiveness of case-based collaborative learning (CBCL) in improving arrhythmia recognition and patient safety attitudes among novice intensive care nurses. Newly graduated nurses with less than one year of professional nursing experience working in coronary or cardiovascular surgery intensive care units are randomly assigned to an intervention or control group. Both groups participate in the institution's routine orientation process for newly employed intensive care nurses. In addition, the intervention group receives a structured CBCL-based arrhythmia education program delivered in two 120-minute sessions over two consecutive weeks. The program uses clinical case scenarios, ECG tracings, individual assessment, small-group collaborative discussion, shared clinical decision-making, and structured feedback. The control group receives no additional study-specific arrhythmia education during the study period. The primary outcome is arrhythmia recognition and awareness, and the secondary outcome is patient safety attitudes. Outcomes are assessed at baseline and at the three-month follow-up in both groups. An additional immediate post-intervention assessment is conducted in the intervention group to examine short-term changes following the educational program.

Detailed description

Early recognition and appropriate interpretation of cardiac arrhythmias are important competencies for nurses working in intensive care settings, where changes in cardiac rhythm may require rapid clinical assessment and timely escalation of care. Novice nurses may have limited opportunities to develop these competencies through clinical experience alone. This study therefore evaluates a case-based collaborative learning (CBCL) approach designed to integrate arrhythmia recognition with clinical reasoning, nursing decision-making, and patient-safety principles. The CBCL intervention uses clinically oriented arrhythmia scenarios accompanied by ECG tracings. Participants first assess each case individually and then work in small groups to discuss their interpretations and reach a shared clinical decision. Group conclusions are subsequently discussed with the educator, who facilitates analysis of the case, clarification of misconceptions, and structured feedback. Patient-safety principles, including recognition of hemodynamic instability, timely escalation of care, differentiation of true arrhythmias from monitoring artefacts, and assessment of the patient's clinical condition, are integrated throughout the educational activities. The main effectiveness evaluation compares the intervention and control groups at the three-month follow-up while accounting for baseline outcome levels. An additional assessment immediately after completion of the educational program is conducted only in the intervention group to explore the immediate educational response and whether the observed improvement is maintained at three months.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCase-Based Collaborative Learning-Based Arrhythmia Education

The intervention consists of two 120-minute educational sessions delivered once weekly over two consecutive weeks by a researcher with formal ECG training and certification in ECG interpretation. Each session uses clinically oriented arrhythmia cases accompanied by ECG tracings. Participants first assess the case individually and then work in small groups of 5-6 nurses to discuss their interpretations and reach a shared clinical decision. Groups present their conclusions, followed by facilitator-guided whole-group analysis, clarification of misconceptions, and structured feedback. The program addresses ECG interpretation, life-threatening rhythms, bradyarrhythmias, atrioventricular blocks, atrial tachyarrhythmias, medication- and electrolyte-related ECG changes, QT prolongation, and monitoring problems. Patient-safety principles and appropriate nursing responses and escalation of care are integrated throughout the cases.

Sponsors

Naile ALANKAYA
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Participants are stratified by intensive care unit (coronary intensive care unit or cardiovascular surgery intensive care unit) and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the intervention or control group.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Newly graduated nurses with less than one year of professional nursing experience * Currently working in the coronary intensive care unit or cardiovascular surgery intensive care unit * Voluntary participation in the study * Provision of written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Previous participation in a structured arrhythmia or ECG training program

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Arrhythmia Recognition and Awareness Test (ARAT)Baseline and 3 months after randomizationThe Arrhythmia Recognition and Awareness Test (ARAT) consists of 27 items assessing arrhythmia recognition and awareness. Each correct response is scored as 1 and each incorrect response as 0, yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 27. Higher scores indicate better arrhythmia recognition and awareness.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ)Baseline and 3 months after randomizationThe Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) is used to assess participants' attitudes toward patient safety. The questionnaire includes 46 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale and comprises six dimensions: teamwork climate, safety climate, job satisfaction, stress recognition, perceptions of management, and working conditions. Higher scores indicate more positive attitudes toward patient safety.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

CONTACTNaile Alankaya, Associate Prof. PhD
naile.alankaya@gmail.com+905334256510
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORNaile Alankaya, Associate Prof. PhD

Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Faculty of Health Sciences

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 27, 2026