DCD Kidney, Kidney Transplant
Conditions
Keywords
DCD kidneys, Normothermic Regional Perfusion (NRP), Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion, Patient reported outcomes, Kidney transplants, Randomised Control Trial, Health economic analysis
Brief summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the combination of Normothermic Regional Perfusion (NRP) at the time of organ procurement with ex situ Hypothermic Oxygenated Perfusion (HMPO2) of kidneys recovered from donors after circulatory death (DCD) is superior to NRP alone. The researchers will learn if the combined use of these technologies provides a benefit in terms of kidney transplant outcomes. The researchers will also learn about the patient quality of life after these transplants and if the use of these technologies is cost efficient. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does NRP +HMPO2 provides a better DCD kidney function at 1 year post-transplant compared to NRP alone. * Are the postoperative complications and outcomes different between the two groups? * Is the quality of life of recipients different between the two groups? * Is the use of NRP +HMPO2 a cost effective strategy? Researchers will compare NRP and HMPO2 with NRP alone to see if the combined use of the technologies provides better transplant outcomes. Participants will: * Receive a kidney treated with one of the two strategies. * Visit the clinic as per usual clinical practice for checkups and tests * Report on their quality of life pre and post transplant * Undergo a kidney biopsy at one year to forecast long term transplant function
Detailed description
The trial is designed as a randomised, controlled, multicentre superiority trial with the primary endpoint of eGFR at one year after kidney transplant. The trial will be carried out in the four academic hospitals with renal transplant programs in Sweden: Stockholm, Gothenburg, Malmo and Uppsala. Randomisation 1:1 and eCRF will be done using RedCap. Each eligible kidney for the trial will be randomised 1:1 between the following groups: Group 1 - control group: Following in-situ NRP and in-situ flushing, the kidney will be packed in a storage box and stored on ice until back-table preparation before transplantation at the recipient centre. Group 2 - intervention group: Following in-situ NRP and in-situ flushing, the kidney will be placed on the Kidney Assist Transporter HMPO2 device and perfused with oxygenated Belzers Machine Preservation Solution at a pulsatile pressure of 25 mmHg starting immediately after retrieval until back-table preparation before kidney transplantation at the transplant centre. Oxygen will be delivered at a rate of 100 ml/min via an oxygenator from a portable oxygen cylinder, resulting in a partial oxygen tension in the perfusate of 90 kPa (for reference, +/- 675 mmHg). Kidney donors All standard allocation rules and recipient matching will be undertaken according to standard practice. Randomisation 1:1 of the kidneys between the two study arms will be done once the recovery of the organs is completed successfully with NRP and both kidneys are accepted for transplant. One kidney will be allocated to static cold storage preservation arm and the other to HMPO2 arm. If both kidneys are transplanted at the same centre, an additional stratification will determine which kidney will be transplanted first. If only one kidney is recovered or allocated to a Swedish centre, this will be randomised following a kidney alone randomisation procedure. Kidneys will be shared between the four transplant centres according to clinical protocols in place. The care of the donor and the NRP recovery procedure, will be performed according to standard practice. Kidney recipients Written consent regarding trial participation will be sought from all patients on the waiting list or for the newly listed patients, at the time of listing. Kidney recipients will be selected according to national organ allocation rules, independent of participation in the trial. Surgery will be performed according to local clinical protocols and postoperative care managed according to standard of care. During the follow-up, biopsies will be performed according to the local standard of care and if indicated for clinical management. At the end of the one year follow up, a renal biopsy will be taken to determine the iBox score. The clinical care of the patients will reflect the current standard of care at the recipient hospital with no deviation from routine care protocols. Modifications * Since the intervention is a one-time event occurring prior to transplantation, the assigned study intervention will not need to be modified or discontinued once the kidney is transplanted. * If the machine fails, the kidney will be end up being cold stored on the device. If these kidneys are transplanted, the recipient will still be included in the secondary modified intention-to-treat analysis according to the treatment actually received. Adherence Since the intervention occurs prior to the transplantation procedure, there are no measures to assure adherence to study intervention. For data collection, all variables beside the 1-year study biopsy are part of standard of care after kidney transplantation so no additional measures are needed. As one year biopsy is not part of routine care in all centres, all study participants will be consented for the biopsy and will have the option to opt out. A subgroup analysis will be undertaken in those patients for whom a one year biopsy is undertaken. All study participants that consented to participation, will receive a written invitation for the biopsy performed at the local centre. Follow up visits All follow-up visits and endpoint measures besides the 1-year biopsy are standard of care after renal transplantation in Sweden. The patient will receive an invitation for the 1-year biopsy if they've signed the informed consent for biopsy. Data will be collected from patient medical records after informed consent. Data will be accessed in medical records. During the trial the following data will be retrieved: * Donor demographics * Recipient demographics * NRP and Preservation parameters * Surgical and clinical variables * Graft and patient survival * Follow-up data (including complications, adverse events, biopsy and biochemical markers) Variables and data collection Data will be collected on RedCap for the trial. All blood sampling will be undertaken as part of the routine clinical follow-up with additional study specific samples as above. Recruitment Approximately 100 kidney transplants from DCD donors are performed each year in Sweden. Although these numbers are expected to increase by about 20%-30% over the next 3 years, researchers planned recruitment on the current level of activity and are confident that 107 eligible kidney pair recipients will be recruited in 36 months (allowing for a the drop out in follow-up and for organs allocated in Scandiatransplant in the STAMP exchange and the payback system between countries). The researchers therefore estimate an enrolment of about 214 DCD kidney transplants during the study period. Study duration The study is planned to start in January 2027 and with patient inclusion between March 2027 and December 2029, with a one year follow until December 2030. Written summary and presentation of findings in peer-reviewed journals is planned to be completed by March 2031.
Interventions
Ex situ preservation of NRP DCD kidneys with hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Donor kidneys: 1. All DCD donors in Sweden with consent for organ donation and where organ recovery is undertaken with NRP. 2. Kidney deemed transplantable by donor surgeon and responsible transplant surgeon (not discarded before or during procurement) Recipients: 1. All adult patients (\>18 yrs old) eligible for renal transplantation during study duration. 2. Recipient consented for surgery, matched to a DCD kidney.
Exclusion criteria
Donor kidneys: 1\. Kidney allocated outside of Sweden according to Scandiatransplant allocation rules. Recipients: 1. Paediatric patients (\<18 yrs old). 2. Participation in other clinical drug or medical devices trials. 3. Patient subject to combined transplant of kidney + other organ.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Renal function after transplantation | One year after transplantation | Renal function estimated by the glomerular filtration rate at 1 year after transplantation as determined by the Lund Malmö revised formula for eGFR calculated based on creatinine value |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Kidney transplant questionnaire KTQ-25 | Three months and one year post transplant | Evaluates the health related quality of life specifically in patients who have undergone a kidney transplant on a 7 point Likert scale with lower score reflecting a worse state. |
| EQ-5D-5L | Three months and one year post transplant. | A measure of generic health related quality of life and health status with three dimensions: * health state profile (range from 11111 -perfect health to 55555 worst health) * utility score (with a score of 1 representing perfect health and a score of 0 representing a health state equivalent to death) * visual analogue score ranging from 0 -worst health to 100 - best health |
| 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) | Three months and one year post transplant | Patient reported health-related quality of life measured on a 0-100 scale where 100 represents the best status and 0 the worst status. |
| Biomarkers of kidney injury | One year post transplantation | We will also measure various biomarkers of kidney injury and inflammation in perfusate, tissue, and blood samples, including lactate dehydrogenase, D-dimer, cardiolipin, Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin, Kidney Injury Molecule-1, Glutathione S-transferase, interleukin-18, fatty acid binding protein, and microRNA 21 and proteomic analyses. |
| Donor derived cell free DNA | 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours; 1 and 2 weeks; and 1, 3, 6, 12 months after transplantation | Quantification of kidney injury post transplant measured as absolute quantification and fractional abundance |
| D-dimers | 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours; 1 and 2 weeks; and 1, 3, 6, 12 months after transplantation | Measures the risk of microthrombosis in the kidney transplant with higher levels indicating micro thrombosis of the kidney. |
| Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin (NGAL) | 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours; 1 and 2 weeks; and 1, 3, 6, 12 months after transplantation | Measures the level of acute kidney injury with higher level denoting more sever injuries. |
| cardiolipin antibodies | 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours; 1 and 2 weeks; and 1, 3, 6, 12 months after transplantation | Measures the risk of vascular complications and early graft failure with higher level denoting increased risk of transplant failure. |
| Kidney Injury Molecule-1 (KIM-1) | 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours; 1 and 2 weeks; and 1, 3, 6, 12 months after transplantation | Non invasive biomarker of early proximal tubular injury with level and risk of DGF and acute rejection |
| Glutathione S-Transferase (GST) | 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours; 1 and 2 weeks; and 1, 3, 6, 12 months after transplantation | Biomaker of kidney injury measuring the level of cellular damage in the kidney transplant with higher levels suggesting a greater degree of damage |
| Interleukin-18 (IL-18) | 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours; 1 and 2 weeks; and 1, 3, 6, 12 months after transplantation | Biomarker measured in the urine to identify acute ischemic and inflammatory injuries with higher levels indicating greater damage. |
| Liver-type Fatty Acid-Binding Protein (L-FABP) | 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours; 1 and 2 weeks; and 1, 3, 6, 12 months after transplantation | Non-invasive urine biomarker used to detect allograft ischemia and oxidative stress |
| microRNA-21 (miR-21) | 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours; 1 and 2 weeks; and 1, 3, 6, 12 months after transplantation | Non-invasive genetic biomarker to predict delayed graft function and monitor the progression of chronic tissue scarring. |
| Urinary proteome analysis | 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours; 1 and 2 weeks; and 1, 3, 6, 12 months after transplantation | Cutting-edge diagnostic tool in kidney transplantation \[1\]. Instead of tracking a single protein, it measures patterns of hundreds of distinct protein fragments simultaneously to detect early allograft rejection and predict long-term organ survival. |
| 1. the iBox score at one year | One year after transplantation | iBOX scoring system is an innovative composite endpoint that has been validated by EMEA and FDA as the first surrogate end point for clinical studies. iBox is a risk prediction score that utilises multiple clinical and pathological relevant features (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), proteinuria, anti-human leukocyte antigen donor-specific antibody, and kidney graft biopsy histopathology) at one-year post-transplant to predict the likelihood of the transplanted kidney to fail over fixed intervals (3, 5, and 7 years). The output is presented as a continuous mathematical percentage and the score is interpreted as the absolute statistical risk of losing the kidney graft. |
| Graft (uncensored and censored for recipient death) survival | One year after transplant | Survival rate of kidney transplant |
| Patient survival | One year after transplantation | Proportion of patient survivint |
| Delayed graft function | 7 days after transplantation | Need for dialysis for all causes within the first 7 days after kidney transplantation. |
| Postoperative complications | Three months and one year after transplant | Post operative complications measured by the comprehensive complication index (CCI). CCI ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting higher number and more severe complications |
| Incidence of acute rejection | One year after transplantation | The proportion of patients having biopsy proven acute rejection episodes |
| Kidney Disease Quality of Life (KDQOL) | Three months and one year after transplantation | Recipient health related quality of life post transplantation measured specifically for individuals with chronic kidney disease. Range 0-100 with higher values reflecting better quality of life. |
| Health economic analysis | One year post transplantation | Health economic analysis and cost effectiveness analysis of using ex situ oxygenated machine perfusion in addition to NRP in DCD kidney transplantation |
Countries
Sweden
Contacts
Karolinska University Hospital