Diastema, Generalized Interdental Spaces
Conditions
Keywords
Diastema, Generalized Interdental Spacing, Clear Aligners, Fixed Orthodontic Appliances, Laser Frenectomy, Treatment Stability
Brief summary
This study is a prospective 2x2 factorial randomized clinical trial designed to evaluate and compare the closure efficiency and post-treatment stability of diastema associated with generalized interdental spacing (width \>= 3 mm) treated with clear aligners versus fixed orthodontic appliances, with and without adjunctive laser frenectomy. Participants are randomized into four treatment arms to assess the main effects and interaction effects of appliance modality and laser frenectomy. Stability and relapse rates are systematically tracked across active treatment, a 6-month retention period, and post-retention follow-up intervals at 6 and 8 months.
Detailed description
Diastema associated with generalized interdental spacing (\>= 3 mm) represents a challenging orthodontic condition with a heightened risk of post-treatment relapse. While fixed appliances provide reliable three-dimensional tooth movement control, clear aligners offer improved esthetics and patient comfort. Additionally, the role and timing of adjunctive laser frenectomy in stabilizing space closure remain controversial in generalized spacing cases. This prospective 2x2 factorial randomized clinical trial is conducted at the Orthodontic Clinics, Faculty of Dentistry, Sana'a University, Yemen. A total of 48 eligible participants are randomly allocated into four equal groups (n=12 per group): 1. Group 1: Clear Aligner Therapy with Adjunctive Laser Frenectomy 2. Group 2: Clear Aligner Therapy without Frenectomy 3. Group 3: Fixed Orthodontic Appliance with Adjunctive Laser Frenectomy 4. Group 4: Fixed Orthodontic Appliance without Frenectomy Treatment Protocols: * Clear Aligner Group: Digital intraoral scans are obtained using a Zahndent scanner. Virtual treatment planning ensures sequential space closure with root control. Aligners are manufactured by Dentalign Company (Sana'a, Yemen) and worn 20-22 hours daily. * Fixed Appliance Group: Treated using MBT prescription brackets with a 0.022-inch slot. The archwire sequence includes initial leveling with 0.012 to 0.018 NiTi wires, followed by rectangular stainless steel wires (0.016x0.022, 0.017x0.025, and 0.019x0.025 inches) for space closure and torque control. * Auxiliary Mechanics: Cervical buttons are bonded in selected teeth across aligner and fixed groups to enhance bodily movement control. * Adjunctive Laser Frenectomy: Performed using standardized laser technique following partial or complete space closure in designated groups. Retention and Evaluation: All participants follow a standardized retention protocol for 6 months post-treatment. Clinical, digital (Zahndent intraoral scanner), and radiographic (digital periapical sensor) assessments are conducted at five measurement time points: * T0: Baseline (pre-treatment) * T1: End of active orthodontic treatment * T2: End of retention period (6 months) * T3: 6 months post-retention * T4: 8 months post-retention The primary outcome is the amount of diastema relapse (mm). Secondary outcomes include total space closure, root parallelism, and relapse rates.
Interventions
Custom thermoplastic aligners worn 20-22 hours daily with sequential staged movements for space closure.
Metal brackets with MBT 0.022-inch slot prescription and sequential archwires for controlled space closure.
Surgical ablation and tissue excision of the labial frenum performed using a soft-tissue diode laser.
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
A 2x2 factorial randomized clinical trial evaluating two main factors: 1) Orthodontic appliance type (Clear Aligners vs Fixed Appliances) and 2) Adjunctive procedure (Laser Frenectomy vs No Frenectomy), yielding four distinct treatment groups.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Adult patients aged 18 to 35 years. * Presence of maxillary median diastema associated with generalized interdental spacing (width \>= 3 mm). * Fully erupted permanent teeth (excluding third molars). * Good periodontal health with probing depths \<= 3 mm and no bone loss. * High motivation and commitment to follow treatment protocols and compliance. * Written informed consent provided.
Exclusion criteria
* Previous orthodontic treatment. * Severe skeletal malocclusion or craniofacial anomalies. * Active periodontal disease, poor oral hygiene, or untreated caries. * Missing or impacted permanent teeth in the maxillary arch (excluding third molars). * Systemic diseases or long-term medication use affecting bone metabolism or tooth movement (e.g., bisphosphonates, systemic corticosteroids). * Pregnant or lactating females. * Heavy smokers or individuals with severe parafunctional
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Amount of Diastema Relapse | Baseline (0 months), 18 months, 24 months, 30 months, and 32 months | Linear measurement (in millimeters) of maxillary median diastema relapse evaluated on digital 3D models (obtained via intraoral scanner) to measure space reopening post-treatment. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Labial Frenum Re-attachment Level | Baseline, 18 months, and 32 months | Linear measurement of labial frenum attachment level (in millimeters relative to the mucogingival junction). |
| Rate and Efficiency of Diastema Closure | Up to 18 months | Total duration (months) to achieve complete space closure and the rate of space closure per month (mm/month) measured from digital 3D models. |
| Root Parallelism and Angulation Changes | Baseline and 18 months | Assessment of central incisor root parallelism and root position (bodily movement vs tipping) measured in degrees on digital periapical radiographs. |
Contacts
Sana'a University