Skip to content

Effectiveness of a Communication Training Program in Improving the Handling of Calls for Suspected Cardiac Arrest at SAMU-Centre 15.

Effectiveness of a Communication Training Program in Improving the Handling of Calls for Suspected Cardiac Arrest at SAMU-Centre 15. A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Stepped-Wedge Implementation Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07776990
Acronym
COM-ARM
Enrollment
987
Registered
2026-08-20
Start date
2026-10-01
Completion date
2028-08-01
Last updated
2026-08-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Arrest (CA)

Keywords

Cardiac Arrest, Dispatcher, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Brief summary

Each year, France's emergency response services-the SAMU (15) and the fire department (18)-handle 31 million and 19 million calls, respectively. The effectiveness of this system depends on the call centers' ability to obtain location information, prioritize responses, assess the severity of each call, and dispatch appropriate emergency resources. Cardiac arrest (CA) affects 40,000 people in France each year who call on this service. The survival rate decreases by 7 to 10% for every minute that elapses between cardiac arrest and the start of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Early CPR performed by bystanders is associated with a survival rate 2-3 times higher than CPR initiated only after emergency responders arrive on the scene. CPR assisted by SAMU-Centre 15 dispatchers (T-CPR) is a way to provide CPR to patients before emergency responders arrive on the scene and is recommended as early as possible to improve survival. According to the American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines, the timing of the initiation of the chain of survival is considered high quality if T-CPR is initiated within 90 seconds. Studies show that recognizing a cardiac arrest (CA) over the phone is often difficult for several reasons, including communication challenges, the caller's stress, and the presence of abnormal breathing. Emergency medical dispatchers (EMDs) receive very little training on communication strategies, particularly those needed to optimally manage stressed and sometimes difficult callers. Interventions to improve communication have proven effective among healthcare professionals. These methods included face-to-face training, blended learning programs, simulation-based teamwork exercises, and communication techniques adapted from aviation. Standardized scripting systems have been shown to improve the speed of decision-making and the dispatch of emergency response teams. These scripts depend on the quality of the information provided by the caller and the caller's ability to communicate effectively with the EMD. The objective of this study will be to evaluate the effect of a communication training program for Centre-15 emergency medical dispatchers on calls for cardiac arrest.

Interventions

OTHERMultifaceted intervention including 4 components

a multifaceted initiative combining training for SAMU-Centre 15 emergency medical dispatchers (EMDs) on the use of a standardized script, training on barriers to the early recognition of cardiac arrest, communication training to optimize the relationship with the caller, and training on handling difficult calls

Sponsors

University Hospital, Grenoble
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

A multicenter, randomized controlled trial using a stepped-wedge implementation design.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of presumed medical origin in an adult patient diagnosed during the phone call to the 15 emergency dispatch center Non Inclusion Criteria: * Minor patients, * Calls initially handled by another emergency call center or a healthcare professional, * Calls regarding cardiac arrest for which CPR has already been initiated at the time the call is made to the 15 center, * Obvious or known pregnancy at the time of enrollment. * Persons protected under Articles L1121-6 and L1121-8 of the Public Health Code (CSP).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The effect of a multifaceted training intervention for SAMU-Centre 15 emergency medical technicians on the proportion of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of medical origin who receive early T-RCP within 90 seconds of the call being answered,BaselineThe p-roportion of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests of medical origin for which T-RCP guidance is initiated within 90 seconds of the EMD answering the call will be calculated by the time to initiation of T-CPR (defined as the time elapsed between the SAMU-Centre 15 operator answering the call and the first time the operator verbally provides cardiopulmonary resuscitation instructions to the caller) The criterion will be considered met when this time is 90 seconds or less.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The initial heart rate recordedBaselineThe initial heart rhythm recorded by a physician based on an analysis of the first heart rhythm recorded after the arrival of emergency medical personnel
Proportion of recognized cardiac arrestsBaselinePercentage of calls for suspected cardiac arrest (CA) out of the total number of calls received for confirmed cardiac arrest (upon the arrival of emergency responders at the scene).
Proportion of CAs recognized in calls for recognizable CAsBaselinePercentage of calls for CAs identified relative to the number of calls received for identifiable CAs
Proportion of CA calls receiving CPR guidance,BaselinePercentage of calls receiving advice from T-RCP
Proportion of CA calls in which the caller agrees to begin CPR for all CAsBaselinePercentage of calls for CAs where the caller agrees to begin CPR for all CAs
Time to recognize a cardiac arrestBaselineTimeframe for the EMS to recognize the CA.
Time to obtain location informationBaselineTime between answering the call and obtaining precise location information
Percentage of cardiac arrests recognized within 60 secondsBaselinePercentage of calls for CA recognized in less than 60 seconds, based on "recognizable" calls
Percentage of cardiac arrests recognized within 90 secondsBaselinePercentage of calls for CA recognized in less than 90 seconds, based on "recognizable" calls
Time to begin CPR instructionsBaselineTimeframe for Initiating CPR instructions
Percentage of calls where CPR instructions begin within 150 secondsBaselineThe proportion of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests of medical origin for which T-RCP guidance is initiated within 150 seconds of the EMD answering the call is defined by the time to initiation of T-CPR
Return of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC)perioperatively/periprocedurally (during the CPR)ROSC: defined by a clinical assessment of vital signs, including the presence of a palpable pulse or blood pressure
Survival with good neurological outcome at 30 days30 daysFavorable neurological outcome at 30 days : Neurological outcome will be assessed by a physician using: \- the Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) scale CPC 1 : Good Cerbral Performance -\> CPC 5: Brain Death
Quality of communication by the EMDImmediately after the procedureCall quality between the EMD and the caller: The evaluation will be conducted in accordance with the recommendations published by the Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS) \[85\], which include guidelines for conducting interviews with callers and communication protocols. An assessment of compliance with the decision-making algorithms will also be included. The evaluation will be carried out by experts during a blinded review of the trial period.
The proportion of patients admitted alive, discharged alive from the hospital, and alive at 30 daysDay 0, day of discharge of the hospital and 30 daysSurvival at hospital admission, discharge, and at 30 days
Impact on service qualityDay of inclusionImpact analysis on Center 15 by evaluating the QS30

Countries

France

Contacts

CONTACTGuillaume Debaty, MD, PhD
gdebaty@chu-grenoble.fr+334767634202
CONTACTJuliette Meyzenc
jmeyzenc@chu-grenoble.fr+33476634256
STUDY_DIRECTORMonique Sorrentino

CHU Grenoble Alpes

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 21, 2026