Skip to content

Short-Stay Aggressive Hydration to Prevent Post-ERCP Pancreatitis

Preventing Post ERCP Pancreatitis by Short Stay Aggressive Hydration (PuSH) -a Prospective Randomized Trial.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07776561
Acronym
PuSH
Enrollment
1300
Registered
2026-08-20
Start date
2026-06-01
Completion date
2029-06-01
Last updated
2026-08-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post-ERCP Pancreatitis, Pancreatitis

Keywords

ERCP, Post-ERCP pancreatitis, Aggressive hydration, Lactated Ringer's solution, Rectal indomethacin, Fluid resuscitation, Same-day discharge

Brief summary

Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common serious adverse event after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), occurring in roughly 7-15% of patients. Rectal non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and peri-procedural aggressive intravenous hydration each reduce PEP, but published hydration regimens are delivered over 8-24 hours and require an overnight hospital stay, which is impractical where ERCP is increasingly performed as a same-day procedure. This multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled trial tests whether a short (under 4 hours) aggressive hydration regimen with Lactated Ringer's solution, combined with rectal indomethacin, is superior to standard care (rectal indomethacin plus low-volume hydration) for preventing PEP, while supporting same-day discharge. Adults undergoing ERCP are randomised 1:1. The primary outcome is the incidence of PEP defined by consensus (Cotton) criteria. A total of 1300 participants (650 per arm) will be enrolled.

Detailed description

Design: multicentre, parallel-group, superiority RCT with 1:1 allocation, conducted in high-volume tertiary academic endoscopy units. Interventions: All participants receive 100 mg indomethacin per rectum within 30 minutes before or after ERCP. Participants randomised to aggressive hydration receive a peri-procedural bolus of Lactated Ringer's 20 mL/kg over \ 1 hour, then 3 mL/kg/hour for 3 hours (post-procedure infusion capped at 1000 mL). Participants randomised to standard care receive low-volume Lactated Ringer's at the discretion of the endoscopist/anaesthetist (up to 1.5 mL/kg/hour, max 500 mL over 3 hours). For BMI \> 40 kg/m2, infusion rates are capped assuming a BMI of 40. Pancreatic duct stenting is permitted in both arms at the proceduralist's discretion per guidelines. Aggressive hydration is discontinued if signs of fluid overload develop. Follow-up: pre-discharge assessment (fluid-overload exam, pain), a 24-hour telephone follow-up (bloods if symptomatic), and a 30-day telephone follow-up for delayed events and hospitalisation. Analysis: primary analysis by intention-to-treat; per-protocol analysis also performed. Statistical analysis is conducted blinded to allocation.

Interventions

OTHERShort-Stay Aggressive Hydration

Lactated Ringer's bolus 20 mL/kg over \~1 hour then 3 mL/kg/hour x 3 hours (cap 1000 mL post-procedure); rate capped at BMI 40 if BMI \> 40.

OTHERStandard Peri-procedural Hydration

Low-volume Lactated Ringer's at operator discretion, up to 1.5 mL/kg/hour, max 500 mL over 3 hours.

Indomethacin 100 mg per rectum within 30 minutes before, during or after ERCP.

Sponsors

Westmead Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age over 18 years * Undergoing ERCP * Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Unable to give consent * Clinical signs/symptoms of congestive cardiac failure (pitting oedema, NYHA class ≥ 2, or oxygen saturation ≤ 90%) * Respiratory failure (pre-procedure SpO2 \< 90% on room air, or requirement for non-invasive/mechanical ventilation) * Contraindication to rectal NSAIDs (allergy; active gastrointestinal bleeding) * Estimated GFR (MDRD) ≤ 30 mL/min * Altered biliary or duodenal anatomy (e.g. prior biliary/pancreatic surgery, Roux-en-Y reconstruction) * Known hypo- or hypernatraemia (serum sodium \< 130 or \> 150 mmol/L) * Pregnancy * Severe liver disease (cirrhosis with ascites) * Previous sphincterotomy (unless undergoing pancreatic duct intervention) * Acute pancreatitis * Chronic pancreatitis (unless undergoing a pancreatic duct intervention) * Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction * Pancreatic mass causing biliary obstruction

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP)Within 72 hours after ERCP (onset within 24 hours)PEP defined by consensus (Cotton) criteria, requiring ALL of: new or worsened upper abdominal pain; serum amylase or lipase at least 3x the upper limit of normal; pain and enzyme elevation persisting for at least 24 hours; and hospitalisation (or prolongation) of at least 2 days attributable to pancreatitis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PEP not fulfilling full Cotton criteriaWithin 72 hours after ERCP (onset within 24 hours)Post-ERCP pancreatitis not meeting full Cotton criteria.
Delayed PEP24 hours to 30 days after ERCPPost-ERCP pancreatitis (by Cotton criteria) with onset more than 24 hours after ERCP, identified after initial discharge.
Severity of PEPWithin 30 days after ERCPSeverity graded by Cotton criteria and the Revised Atlanta Classification
ERCP associated adverse eventsWithin 30 days after ERCPERCP-associated adverse events graded by consensus (Cotton) criteria as mild, moderate, or severe: bleeding, perforation, and infection (cholangitis).
Signs of fluid overloadPeri-procedural to 24 hours after ERCPPulmonary oedema, peripheral (pitting) oedema, or exacerbation of congestive cardiac failure.
Hospitalization for any reason within 30 daysWithin 30 days after ERCPProportion of participants hospitalised (including unplanned admission or readmission) for any reason within 30 days of ERCP. Ascertained from medical records and the 30-day follow-up call.
Cost effectivenessWithin 30 days after ERCPCost-effectiveness of short-stay aggressive hydration versus standard care, comparing total cost of healthcare resource use (intravenous fluids and consumables, procedure/recovery time, length of stay, and PEP-related admissions or readmissions) in relation to PEP cases avoided. Reported as incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) for post-ERCP pancreatitis cases avoided.
Hospitalization Length of StayWithin 30 days of ERCPIn participants hospitalised (including unplanned admission or readmission) for any reason within 30 days of ERCP, the length of hospital stay measured in days. Ascertained from medical records and the 30-day follow-up call.
Hospitalization for PEP Length of StayWithin 30 days of ERCPIn participants hospitalised (including unplanned admission or readmission) for PEP within 30 days of ERCP, the length of hospital stay measured in days. Ascertained from medical records and the 30-day follow-up call.

Countries

Australia

Contacts

CONTACTNicholas Burgess
nicholas.burgess@health.nsw.gov.au+61288905555
CONTACTBrian Lam
briannicholas.lam@mail.utoronto.ca
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORNicholas Burgess

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 21, 2026