Skip to content

PD-L1 Inhibitor Rechallenge After Immunotherapy-Related Pneumonitis in Patients With Lung Cancer

Efficacy and Safety of PD-L1 Inhibitor Rechallenge After Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Pneumonitis in Patients With Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Real-World Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07775820
Enrollment
150
Registered
2026-08-20
Start date
2025-10-20
Completion date
2027-06-30
Last updated
2026-08-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Checkpoint Inhibitor Pneumonitis, Lung Cancer, Rechallenge

Keywords

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor, PD-L1 Inhibitor, PD-1 Inhibitor, Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Rechallenge, Checkpoint Inhibitor Pneumonitis, Immune-Related Adverse Events, Real-World Study

Brief summary

This multicenter observational study will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge in adults with lung cancer who developed checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis. The study will use both retrospective medical records and prospective follow-up data. Participants will not be assigned to any treatment by the study protocol. All treatment decisions will be made by the treating physicians as part of routine clinical care. Participants will be classified into three groups according to their subsequent treatment: rechallenge with a PD-L1 inhibitor, rechallenge with a PD-1 inhibitor, or no immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge. The primary outcome is the recurrence of checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis after rechallenge. Secondary outcomes include immune-related adverse events, progression-free survival, overall survival, objective response rate, and disease control rate at 24 weeks. Approximately 150 participants will be included across multiple study centers in China.

Detailed description

Checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis is an important immune-related adverse event associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. Some patients with lung cancer may require immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge after recovery from pneumonitis because of tumor progression or limited subsequent treatment options. However, evidence regarding the safety and effectiveness of PD-L1 inhibitor rechallenge after checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis remains limited. This is a multicenter, ambispective, observational cohort study. The time perspective is classified as Other because the study combines retrospective review of existing medical records with prospective follow-up according to routine clinical visits. Adults with histologically confirmed lung cancer who developed checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis will be included. Participants will be classified into three cohorts according to routine clinical treatment decisions: 1. PD-L1 inhibitor rechallenge cohort; 2. PD-1 inhibitor rechallenge cohort; and 3. No immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge cohort. No participant will be randomly assigned to treatment, and the study protocol will not require any specific treatment, additional visit, laboratory test, or imaging examination. Treatment decisions will be made independently by the treating physicians. Clinical information will be obtained from routine medical records and follow-up assessments. Data collected will include demographic characteristics, lung cancer characteristics, previous cancer treatment, initial checkpoint inhibitor treatment, characteristics and management of checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis, subsequent antitumor treatment, immune-related adverse events, tumor response, disease progression, and survival. The primary objective is to compare the recurrence of checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis after PD-L1 inhibitor and PD-1 inhibitor rechallenge. Secondary objectives include comparisons of progression-free survival, overall survival, recurrence or new onset of other immune-related adverse events, objective response rate, and disease control rate. Exploratory analyses will evaluate clinical factors associated with the safety and effectiveness of PD-L1 inhibitor rechallenge. A non-probability sampling approach will be used to include eligible cases available at the participating centers. The planned enrollment is 150 participants, with approximately 50 participants in each cohort.

Interventions

DRUGPD-L1 Inhibitor Rechallenge

Restarting immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment with a PD-L1 inhibitor after checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis has improved and immunotherapy has been interrupted because of pneumonitis. The treatment is selected by the treating physician and is not assigned by the study protocol.

DRUGPD-1 Inhibitor Rechallenge

Restarting immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment with a PD-1 inhibitor after checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis has improved and immunotherapy has been interrupted because of pneumonitis. The treatment is selected by the treating physician and is not assigned by the study protocol.

DRUGNo Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Rechallenge

Participants do not restart PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor therapy after checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis. Subsequent antitumor management follows routine clinical practice.

Sponsors

Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
CollaboratorOTHER
Shenzhen People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age 18 years or older. 2. Histologically confirmed lung cancer. 3. Development of checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis after treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitor. 4. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0, 1, or 2. 5. Provision of written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Incomplete clinical information required for the study analyses. 2. Considered unsuitable for participation by the investigator.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recurrence Rate of Checkpoint Inhibitor Pneumonitis After Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor RechallengeFrom the date of immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge to the first documented CIP recurrence, death, or study completion, whichever occurs first, assessed for up to 5 years.The percentage of participants in the PD-L1 inhibitor rechallenge cohort and the PD-1 inhibitor rechallenge cohort who experience recurrent checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis after restarting immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. Recurrence will be determined according to the diagnosis documented by the treating physicians in the medical records.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recurrence or New Onset of Other Immune-Related Adverse Events After RechallengeFrom the date of immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge to the first documented recurrence of another immune-related adverse event, death, or study completion, whichever occurs first, assessed for up to 5 years.The percentage of participants in the PD-L1 inhibitor and PD-1 inhibitor rechallenge cohorts who experience recurrence of a previous other immune-related adverse event or development of a new other immune-related adverse event after rechallenge, as documented in the medical records.
Progression-Free SurvivalFrom the date of initiation of the initial immunotherapy until tumor progression, death, or study completion, whichever occurs first, assessed for up to 8 years.From the prespecified index date until tumor progression, death, or study completion, whichever occurs first
Overall SurvivalFrom the date of initiation of the initial immunotherapy until death, or study completion, whichever occurs first, assessed for up to 8 years.From the prespecified index date until death or study completion, whichever occurs first
Objective Response Rate at 24 WeeksUp to 24 weeks after initiation of the post-pneumonitis treatment strategyThe percentage of participants who achieve a best overall response of complete response or partial response within 24 weeks after initiation of the post-pneumonitis treatment strategy, based on routine clinical tumor response assessments documented in the medical records.
Disease Control Rate at 24 WeeksUp to 24 weeks after initiation of the post-pneumonitis treatment strategyThe percentage of participants who achieve a best overall response of complete response, partial response, or stable disease within 24 weeks after initiation of the post-pneumonitis treatment strategy, based on routine clinical tumor response assessments documented in the medical records.

Countries

China

Contacts

CONTACTLaiyu Liu
liulaiyu@sina.com+86 13632102245

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 21, 2026