Skip to content

Non-Invasive Neuromodulation for Essential Tremor: Long-Term Safety and Effectiveness Study

A Prospective, Single-Center, Single-Arm, Open-Label Clinical Study Evaluating the Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Transcutaneous Afferent Patterned Stimulation (TAPS) in Patients With Essential Tremor

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07774598
Enrollment
50
Registered
2026-08-19
Start date
2025-12-15
Completion date
2027-06-15
Last updated
2026-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Essential Tremor

Brief summary

This is a prospective, single-center, single-arm, open-label clinical study designed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of non-invasive neuromodulation using transcutaneous afferent patterned stimulation (TAPS) in patients with essential tremor (ET). Essential tremor is a common movement disorder that can significantly impair daily functioning and quality of life. Pharmacological treatments are often limited by suboptimal efficacy or adverse effects, highlighting the need for alternative therapeutic approaches. In this study, eligible participants with essential tremor will receive TAPS treatment over a defined follow-up period. Clinical outcomes, including tremor severity, functional performance, and patient-reported outcomes, will be assessed longitudinally to evaluate treatment effectiveness. Safety will be monitored throughout the study by recording adverse events and device-related complications. The results of this study aim to provide clinical evidence regarding the long-term therapeutic potential and safety profile of TAPS as a non-invasive neuromodulation strategy for essential tremor.

Interventions

DEVICETranscutaneous Afferent Patterned Stimulation

A non-invasive, wearable neuromodulation device that delivers transcutaneous afferent patterned stimulation (TAPS) to modulate neural circuits associated with essential tremor. The device is applied according to the study protocol over the treatment period.

Sponsors

Ruijin Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults aged ≥18 and \<75 years * Clinical diagnosis of essential tremor (ET), characterized by postural and/or kinetic tremor, primarily affecting one or both upper limbs, with or without involvement of other body regions (e.g., head, voice, or lower limbs) * At least one major hand task score ≥2 on the TETRAS (The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale), and a score ≥3 on the Bain \& Findley Activities of Daily Living (BF-ADL) scale * Able and willing to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of implanted electronic medical devices (e.g., deep brain stimulator or cardiac pacemaker) * History of thalamotomy or other neurosurgical procedures for tremor * History of epilepsy * Current treatment with botulinum toxin for upper limb tremor * Skin lesions on the upper limb at the stimulation site (e.g., tumors, hemangiomas) * Neurological disorders affecting the upper limbs * Known allergy to device materials (e.g., silicone, cotton textiles) * Pregnant women * Intake of caffeine or excessive alcohol within 8 hours prior to enrollment * Severe cardiovascular or cerebrovascular diseases, or other significant neurological disorders * Inability to comply with study procedures or follow-up

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Tremor Severity (The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale [TETRAS] Score)Baseline; Day 1; 1 month; 3 monthsChange in tremor severity from baseline to each post-treatment time point, assessed using the The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale (TETRAS). The TETRAS score ranges from 0 to 64, with higher scores indicating more severe tremor.
Incidence of Adverse Events3 monthsIncidence, type, and severity of adverse events occurring after treatment initiation. Adverse events will be graded according to standard criteria (e.g., CTCAE)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Activities of Daily Living (Blessed Functional Activities of Daily Living [BF-ADL] Score)Baseline; Day 1; 1 month; 3 monthsChange in activities of daily living from baseline to each post-treatment time point, assessed using the Blessed Functional Activities of Daily Living Scale (BF-ADL). The BF-ADL score ranges from 0 to 17, with higher scores indicating greater functional impairment.
Change in Anxiety Severity (Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale [HAMA])Baseline; 1 month; 3 monthsChange in anxiety severity from baseline to each post-treatment time point, assessed using the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA). The HAMA score ranges from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating more severe anxiety.
Change in Depression Severity (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [HAMD])Baseline; 1 month; 3 monthsChange in depression severity from baseline to each post-treatment time point, assessed using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD). The HAMD score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating more severe depression.
Change in Cognitive Function (Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA])Baseline; 1 month; 3 monthsChange in cognitive function from baseline to each post-treatment time point, assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). The MoCA score ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive function.
Change in Cognitive Function (Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE])Baseline; 1 month; 3 monthsChange in cognitive function from baseline to each post-treatment time point, assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). The MMSE score ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive function.
Change in EEG Alpha Band PowerBaseline; 1 month; 3 monthsChange in electroencephalogram (EEG) alpha band power (8-12 Hz) from baseline to each post-treatment time point.
Change in Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) AmplitudeBaseline; 1 month; 3 monthsChange in motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude from baseline to each post-treatment time point, measured using transcranial magnetic stimulation. MEP amplitude is measured in millivolts (mV), with higher values indicating greater corticospinal excitability.
Change in Functional Connectivity (fMRI)Baseline; 3 monthsChange in functional connectivity between predefined brain regions from baseline to post-treatment, assessed using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).

Countries

China

Contacts

CONTACTJun Liu, MD,PhD
jly0520@hotmail.com021-86-64370045

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 20, 2026