Skip to content

Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Lateralization as Office-Based Procedures for Bilateral Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy

Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Lateralization as Office-Based Procedures for Bilateral Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy: A Randomized Comparative Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07772505
Enrollment
54
Registered
2026-08-19
Start date
2020-11-17
Completion date
2022-06-17
Last updated
2026-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Inferior Turbinates Hypertrophy, Nasal Obstruction

Keywords

Radiofrequency Ablation, Turbinate Lateralization, Turbinate Outfracture, Turbinates, Nasal Surgical Procedures, Office-Based Surgery, Local Anesthesia

Brief summary

: Patient Information Sheet and Informed Consent Form PATIENT INFORMATION SHEET AND INFORMED CONSENT FORM (for adult subjects and interventional studies) 1. Title of study: A Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Study between Lateralization Vs Radiofrequency Ablation for Patients with Bilateral Inferior Turbinates Hypertrophy 2. Name of investigator and institution: Dr Ong Hui Yan (Principal Investigator), Jabatan Otorhinolaryngology, Pusat Purubatan Universiti Malaya/ Hospital Tengku Ampuan Rahimah Klang Dr Ng Jia Ji (Co-investigator), Jabatan Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital Tengku Ampuan Rahimah Dr Shashi Gopalan (Supervisor), Jabatan Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital Tengku Ampuan Rahimah 3. Name of sponsor: This is a self-sponsored study 4. Introduction: You are invited to participate in a research study because you have nose blockage which are not responding to medical treatment and may require surgical intervention. If you are not keen for operation in the operating theatre, we may offer procedures which can be done in clinic setting. It is important that you understand why the research is being done and what it will involve. Please take your time to read through and consider this information carefully before you decide if you are willing to participate. Ask the study staff if anything is unclear or if you like more information. After you are properly satisfied that you understand this study, and that you wish to participate, you must sign this informed consent form. To participate in this study, you may be required to provide you doctor with information on your health history; you may harm yourself if you are not truthful with the information provided. Your participation in this study is voluntary. You do not have to be in this study if you do not want to. You may also refuse to answer any questions you do not want to answer. If you volunteer to be in this study, you may withdraw from it at any time. If you withdraw, any data collected from you up to your withdrawal will still be used for the study. Your refusal to participate or withdrawal will not affect any medical or health benefits to which you are otherwise entitled. This study has been approved by the Medical Research and Ethics Committee, Ministry of Health Malaysia. 5. What is the purpose of the study? The purpose of this study is to compare between 2 clinic procedures which we perform under clinic setting for patients with nose obstruction due to enlarged turbinates. We are comparing the outcomes between these 2 procedures. This research can help us to decide on the most effective and safe procedure for patients with similar problem. There are surgical interventions which are more effective from literature and we are performing them in the operating theatre, and requires full body anesthesia. If you are not keen for that, the 2 clinical procedures listed in this study will be an alternative. If you are agreeable for the study, you will only be subjected to only 1 of the procedures. The current procedure that we are rountinely doing now in our clinic is to shrink the turbinates by using a machine. Another procedure that we are comparing with is faster and requires only simple instrument. Both of the procedures carry similar risks, such as pain, bleeding and crusting and recurrences. Both the procedures involved are performed in clinic and do not require admission. 180 participants will be included in this study. The whole study will last about 3 months and your participation will be about 3 months. 6\. What kind of study procedures will I receive? If you agree to participate in the study, you will be randomly assigned to one of the treatment groups below. You have equal chance of being assigned to each of the group. Group 1: Radiofrequency ablation of the inferior turbinates (using machine to burn and shrink the enlarged turbinates in your nose) Group 2: Lateralization of the inferior turbinates (using an instrument to manipulate and push aside the turbinates) Both of the procedures aim to reduce the size of the enlarged turbinates and to improve your nose blockage. Both of the procedures carry similar risk and side-effects, such as pain, bleeding, crusting and recurrence of symptoms. Only the principal investigator and the co-investigator will perform the procedure for you, and it will be supervised by the study supervisor. 7\. What will happen if I decide to take part? * You will first be examined on your nose condition by using a scope. * The size of your turbinates will be documented. * You will be given a set of questionnaire regarding your nose condition to fill up * Your nose will be sprayed on either side, 2 puffs each of the decongestant spray. * You will be given painkiller via injections over the inner side of your nose * Cotton with medication will be inserted into your nose for 5 minutes * Either 1 of the procedures will b performed * After the procedure, you will be monitored for 15 minutes

Detailed description

Purpose: The investigators would like to compare the effectiveness of Radiofrequency ablation of inferior turbinates Vs Lateralization of inferior turbinates on patients with bilateral inferior turbinates, which could be carried out in clinic setting, to determine the best alternative treatment for patients who opt for surgical procedure under clinic setting. Design: This is a randomised, comparative, interventional study. Method: Patients with bilateral inferior turbinates hypertrophy from Tengku Ampuan Rahimah Hospital, who do not wish to undergo other forms of turbinates surgery under general anesthesia, and at the same time, fulfill the inclusion and exclusion criteria were recruited into this study. The participants were randomly assigned into the radiofrequency ablation group as well as the lateralization group. The effectiveness of the procedures was assessed via; NOSE scoring before and after procedures, the size of the inferior turbinates before and after procedures, pain and anxiety level during procedures as well as complications from the procedure respectively.

Interventions

DEVICERadiofrequency ablation of inferior turbinates

Both are office procedures that can be done in clinic and we would like to determine the effectiveness of both.

DEVICELateralization of inferior turbinates

Lateralization of inferior turbinates with freer elevator

Sponsors

Goh Liang Chye
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

* Patients will be allocated a number on registering for the research, such as (001,002,003,…180). By using the research randomixer online, participants will be randomly assigned to either group 1 or group 2. * Photographs of the inferior turbinates will be taken before and after procedures during each visit. The photographs will be assessed by 3 different surgeons, and the surgeons will not be informed on whether it is pre or post procedure. (outcome assessment blinding) * There should be no breaking of the randomization code as the end point accessors are the patients themselves.

Intervention model description

To compare the effectiveness of lateralization Vs Radiofrequency Ablation for patients with bilateral inferior turbinate hypertrophy Randomized Comparative Study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Bilateral inferior turbinate hypertrophy, Grade 3 or 4 (25% Inferior Turbinate Classification System) Age more than 18 years NOSE score more than 30 On conventional pharmacological therapy for more than 3 months

Exclusion criteria

Severe deviated nasal septum or caudal dislocation Nasal polyposis Nasal valve disorder Allergy or contraindication to Marcaine (bupivacaine) with adrenaline, or to Co-Phenylcaine

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary outcome measuresBaseline, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months post-procedure1\. Change in Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Score Description: The total NOSE score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 100 points on a scale, where higher scores indicate worse nasal obstruction (a more severe symptom burden). A successful outcome is defined as a reduction in score from a moderate/extreme level to a mild level. Measure Type: Mean Unit of Measure: score on a scale (0-100) Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months post-procedure

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Secondary outcome measuresBaseline, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months post-procedureChange in Inferior Turbinate Size Description: Inferior turbinate size will be assessed using the 25% Classification System, graded on a scale of 1 to 4, where higher grades indicate worse (larger) turbinate size. Measure Type: Mean Unit of Measure: grade on a scale (1-4)

Countries

Malaysia

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORLiang Chye Goh, MBBS, MS ORL HNS

University of Malaya

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 20, 2026